Technical factors of CT angiography studied with a carotid artery phantom

Scott W. Wise, Kenneth D. Hopper, Todd A. Schwartz, Thomas R. Ten Have, Claudia Kasales

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate scanning parameters (conventional versus spiral CT, section thickness, and pitch) and vessel orientation in the performance of CT angiography. METHODS: Conventional CT and 1.0-, 1.5-, and 2.0-pitch spiral CT acquisitions of a carotid phantom designed with vessels oriented parallel to the z-axis, 45°oblique, and perpendicular to the z-axis were obtained with section thicknesses of 2, 4, and 8 mm. The phantom contained 32 vessels with 0% to 100% stenoses. Normal and stenotic luminal diameters were measured and the number of artifacts was assessed. RESULTS: No overall difference was observed among conventional and spiral CT acquisitions obtained with pitches of 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0. With thicker sections, CT angiographic accuracy decreased and artifacts increased. The three-vessel orientations were relatively comparable in accuracy in terms of the percentage of stenosis measured. Vessels parallel to the z-axis suffered less artifactual degradation. Unique artifacts, such as luminal distortion and beam hardening, were observed in vessels oriented at 45°and perpendicular to the z-axis. CONCLUSION: Use of thinner sections with vessels oriented parallel to the z- axis optimizes CT angiographic quality. There is no apparent degradation with the use of spiral CT, and a pitch of 1.5 or 2.0 provides results equivalent to 1.0-pitch spiral studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)401-408
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology
Volume18
Issue number3
StatePublished - Mar 1 1997

Fingerprint

Spiral Computed Tomography
Carotid Arteries
Artifacts
Pathologic Constriction
Computed Tomography Angiography

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Wise, S. W., Hopper, K. D., Schwartz, T. A., Ten Have, T. R., & Kasales, C. (1997). Technical factors of CT angiography studied with a carotid artery phantom. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 18(3), 401-408.
Wise, Scott W. ; Hopper, Kenneth D. ; Schwartz, Todd A. ; Ten Have, Thomas R. ; Kasales, Claudia. / Technical factors of CT angiography studied with a carotid artery phantom. In: American Journal of Neuroradiology. 1997 ; Vol. 18, No. 3. pp. 401-408.
@article{c2f922b53c814ea18ff96c7aa19fe0f2,
title = "Technical factors of CT angiography studied with a carotid artery phantom",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To evaluate scanning parameters (conventional versus spiral CT, section thickness, and pitch) and vessel orientation in the performance of CT angiography. METHODS: Conventional CT and 1.0-, 1.5-, and 2.0-pitch spiral CT acquisitions of a carotid phantom designed with vessels oriented parallel to the z-axis, 45°oblique, and perpendicular to the z-axis were obtained with section thicknesses of 2, 4, and 8 mm. The phantom contained 32 vessels with 0{\%} to 100{\%} stenoses. Normal and stenotic luminal diameters were measured and the number of artifacts was assessed. RESULTS: No overall difference was observed among conventional and spiral CT acquisitions obtained with pitches of 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0. With thicker sections, CT angiographic accuracy decreased and artifacts increased. The three-vessel orientations were relatively comparable in accuracy in terms of the percentage of stenosis measured. Vessels parallel to the z-axis suffered less artifactual degradation. Unique artifacts, such as luminal distortion and beam hardening, were observed in vessels oriented at 45°and perpendicular to the z-axis. CONCLUSION: Use of thinner sections with vessels oriented parallel to the z- axis optimizes CT angiographic quality. There is no apparent degradation with the use of spiral CT, and a pitch of 1.5 or 2.0 provides results equivalent to 1.0-pitch spiral studies.",
author = "Wise, {Scott W.} and Hopper, {Kenneth D.} and Schwartz, {Todd A.} and {Ten Have}, {Thomas R.} and Claudia Kasales",
year = "1997",
month = "3",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "401--408",
journal = "American Journal of Neuroradiology",
issn = "0195-6108",
publisher = "American Society of Neuroradiology",
number = "3",

}

Wise, SW, Hopper, KD, Schwartz, TA, Ten Have, TR & Kasales, C 1997, 'Technical factors of CT angiography studied with a carotid artery phantom', American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 401-408.

Technical factors of CT angiography studied with a carotid artery phantom. / Wise, Scott W.; Hopper, Kenneth D.; Schwartz, Todd A.; Ten Have, Thomas R.; Kasales, Claudia.

In: American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol. 18, No. 3, 01.03.1997, p. 401-408.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Technical factors of CT angiography studied with a carotid artery phantom

AU - Wise, Scott W.

AU - Hopper, Kenneth D.

AU - Schwartz, Todd A.

AU - Ten Have, Thomas R.

AU - Kasales, Claudia

PY - 1997/3/1

Y1 - 1997/3/1

N2 - PURPOSE: To evaluate scanning parameters (conventional versus spiral CT, section thickness, and pitch) and vessel orientation in the performance of CT angiography. METHODS: Conventional CT and 1.0-, 1.5-, and 2.0-pitch spiral CT acquisitions of a carotid phantom designed with vessels oriented parallel to the z-axis, 45°oblique, and perpendicular to the z-axis were obtained with section thicknesses of 2, 4, and 8 mm. The phantom contained 32 vessels with 0% to 100% stenoses. Normal and stenotic luminal diameters were measured and the number of artifacts was assessed. RESULTS: No overall difference was observed among conventional and spiral CT acquisitions obtained with pitches of 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0. With thicker sections, CT angiographic accuracy decreased and artifacts increased. The three-vessel orientations were relatively comparable in accuracy in terms of the percentage of stenosis measured. Vessels parallel to the z-axis suffered less artifactual degradation. Unique artifacts, such as luminal distortion and beam hardening, were observed in vessels oriented at 45°and perpendicular to the z-axis. CONCLUSION: Use of thinner sections with vessels oriented parallel to the z- axis optimizes CT angiographic quality. There is no apparent degradation with the use of spiral CT, and a pitch of 1.5 or 2.0 provides results equivalent to 1.0-pitch spiral studies.

AB - PURPOSE: To evaluate scanning parameters (conventional versus spiral CT, section thickness, and pitch) and vessel orientation in the performance of CT angiography. METHODS: Conventional CT and 1.0-, 1.5-, and 2.0-pitch spiral CT acquisitions of a carotid phantom designed with vessels oriented parallel to the z-axis, 45°oblique, and perpendicular to the z-axis were obtained with section thicknesses of 2, 4, and 8 mm. The phantom contained 32 vessels with 0% to 100% stenoses. Normal and stenotic luminal diameters were measured and the number of artifacts was assessed. RESULTS: No overall difference was observed among conventional and spiral CT acquisitions obtained with pitches of 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0. With thicker sections, CT angiographic accuracy decreased and artifacts increased. The three-vessel orientations were relatively comparable in accuracy in terms of the percentage of stenosis measured. Vessels parallel to the z-axis suffered less artifactual degradation. Unique artifacts, such as luminal distortion and beam hardening, were observed in vessels oriented at 45°and perpendicular to the z-axis. CONCLUSION: Use of thinner sections with vessels oriented parallel to the z- axis optimizes CT angiographic quality. There is no apparent degradation with the use of spiral CT, and a pitch of 1.5 or 2.0 provides results equivalent to 1.0-pitch spiral studies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030908007&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030908007&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9090394

AN - SCOPUS:0030908007

VL - 18

SP - 401

EP - 408

JO - American Journal of Neuroradiology

JF - American Journal of Neuroradiology

SN - 0195-6108

IS - 3

ER -