Technology as an agricultural pollution control policy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper we consider the market-level impacts of factor-augmenting innovations designed to reduce the use of fertilizers and pesticides, first within the context of a simple two-factor model, and then through a simulation model of the U.S. corn market. In both models, the impacts depend on the output demand elasticity and input substitution elasticities. The principal conclusion of the simulation analysis is that the potential for new techniques to reduce the use of agricultural chemicals is limited. Capital-augmenting innovations would actually raise fertilizer and pesticide usage. Land-augmenting innovations would also tend to increase pesticide usage.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)20-32
Number of pages13
JournalAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics
Volume77
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1995

Fingerprint

pollution control
Pesticides
pesticides
Elasticity
Fertilizers
Technology
elasticity of substitution
fertilizers
Agrochemicals
markets
demand elasticities
agrochemicals
Zea mays
simulation models
Economics
corn
Innovation
Pollution control
Fertilizer
methodology

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

@article{97d6e051568e4886aeb654e602ec10b9,
title = "Technology as an agricultural pollution control policy",
abstract = "In this paper we consider the market-level impacts of factor-augmenting innovations designed to reduce the use of fertilizers and pesticides, first within the context of a simple two-factor model, and then through a simulation model of the U.S. corn market. In both models, the impacts depend on the output demand elasticity and input substitution elasticities. The principal conclusion of the simulation analysis is that the potential for new techniques to reduce the use of agricultural chemicals is limited. Capital-augmenting innovations would actually raise fertilizer and pesticide usage. Land-augmenting innovations would also tend to increase pesticide usage.",
author = "Abler, {David Gerard} and Shortle, {James Samuel}",
year = "1995",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2307/1243885",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "77",
pages = "20--32",
journal = "American Journal of Agricultural Economics",
issn = "0002-9092",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

Technology as an agricultural pollution control policy. / Abler, David Gerard; Shortle, James Samuel.

In: American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 77, No. 1, 01.01.1995, p. 20-32.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Technology as an agricultural pollution control policy

AU - Abler, David Gerard

AU - Shortle, James Samuel

PY - 1995/1/1

Y1 - 1995/1/1

N2 - In this paper we consider the market-level impacts of factor-augmenting innovations designed to reduce the use of fertilizers and pesticides, first within the context of a simple two-factor model, and then through a simulation model of the U.S. corn market. In both models, the impacts depend on the output demand elasticity and input substitution elasticities. The principal conclusion of the simulation analysis is that the potential for new techniques to reduce the use of agricultural chemicals is limited. Capital-augmenting innovations would actually raise fertilizer and pesticide usage. Land-augmenting innovations would also tend to increase pesticide usage.

AB - In this paper we consider the market-level impacts of factor-augmenting innovations designed to reduce the use of fertilizers and pesticides, first within the context of a simple two-factor model, and then through a simulation model of the U.S. corn market. In both models, the impacts depend on the output demand elasticity and input substitution elasticities. The principal conclusion of the simulation analysis is that the potential for new techniques to reduce the use of agricultural chemicals is limited. Capital-augmenting innovations would actually raise fertilizer and pesticide usage. Land-augmenting innovations would also tend to increase pesticide usage.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028850464&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028850464&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2307/1243885

DO - 10.2307/1243885

M3 - Article

VL - 77

SP - 20

EP - 32

JO - American Journal of Agricultural Economics

JF - American Journal of Agricultural Economics

SN - 0002-9092

IS - 1

ER -