Technology, autonomy, and manipulation

Daniel Susser, Beate Roessler, Helen Nissenbaum

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Since 2016, when the Facebook/Cambridge Analytica scandal began to emerge, public concern has grown around the threat of “online manipulation”. While these worries are familiar to privacy researchers, this paper aims to make them more salient to policymakers—first, by defining “online manipulation”, thus enabling identification of manipulative practices; and second, by drawing attention to the specific harms online manipulation threatens. We argue that online manipulation is the use of information technology to covertly influence another person’s decision-making, by targeting and exploiting their decision-making vulnerabilities. Engaging in such practices can harm individuals by diminishing their economic interests, but its deeper, more insidious harm is its challenge to individual autonomy. We explore this autonomy harm, emphasising its implications for both individuals and society, and we briefly outline some strategies for combating online manipulation and strengthening autonomy in an increasingly digital world.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalInternet Policy Review
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

autonomy
manipulation
Decision making
decision making
Information technology
information technology
Economics
targeting
vulnerability
scandal
facebook
privacy
economics
threat
human being

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Susser, Daniel ; Roessler, Beate ; Nissenbaum, Helen. / Technology, autonomy, and manipulation. In: Internet Policy Review. 2019 ; Vol. 8, No. 2.
@article{a4d272534e0d41e9985e828838ad47d5,
title = "Technology, autonomy, and manipulation",
abstract = "Since 2016, when the Facebook/Cambridge Analytica scandal began to emerge, public concern has grown around the threat of “online manipulation”. While these worries are familiar to privacy researchers, this paper aims to make them more salient to policymakers—first, by defining “online manipulation”, thus enabling identification of manipulative practices; and second, by drawing attention to the specific harms online manipulation threatens. We argue that online manipulation is the use of information technology to covertly influence another person’s decision-making, by targeting and exploiting their decision-making vulnerabilities. Engaging in such practices can harm individuals by diminishing their economic interests, but its deeper, more insidious harm is its challenge to individual autonomy. We explore this autonomy harm, emphasising its implications for both individuals and society, and we briefly outline some strategies for combating online manipulation and strengthening autonomy in an increasingly digital world.",
author = "Daniel Susser and Beate Roessler and Helen Nissenbaum",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.14763/2019.2.1410",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
journal = "Internet Policy Review",
issn = "2197-6775",
publisher = "Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society",
number = "2",

}

Technology, autonomy, and manipulation. / Susser, Daniel; Roessler, Beate; Nissenbaum, Helen.

In: Internet Policy Review, Vol. 8, No. 2, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Technology, autonomy, and manipulation

AU - Susser, Daniel

AU - Roessler, Beate

AU - Nissenbaum, Helen

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Since 2016, when the Facebook/Cambridge Analytica scandal began to emerge, public concern has grown around the threat of “online manipulation”. While these worries are familiar to privacy researchers, this paper aims to make them more salient to policymakers—first, by defining “online manipulation”, thus enabling identification of manipulative practices; and second, by drawing attention to the specific harms online manipulation threatens. We argue that online manipulation is the use of information technology to covertly influence another person’s decision-making, by targeting and exploiting their decision-making vulnerabilities. Engaging in such practices can harm individuals by diminishing their economic interests, but its deeper, more insidious harm is its challenge to individual autonomy. We explore this autonomy harm, emphasising its implications for both individuals and society, and we briefly outline some strategies for combating online manipulation and strengthening autonomy in an increasingly digital world.

AB - Since 2016, when the Facebook/Cambridge Analytica scandal began to emerge, public concern has grown around the threat of “online manipulation”. While these worries are familiar to privacy researchers, this paper aims to make them more salient to policymakers—first, by defining “online manipulation”, thus enabling identification of manipulative practices; and second, by drawing attention to the specific harms online manipulation threatens. We argue that online manipulation is the use of information technology to covertly influence another person’s decision-making, by targeting and exploiting their decision-making vulnerabilities. Engaging in such practices can harm individuals by diminishing their economic interests, but its deeper, more insidious harm is its challenge to individual autonomy. We explore this autonomy harm, emphasising its implications for both individuals and society, and we briefly outline some strategies for combating online manipulation and strengthening autonomy in an increasingly digital world.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070946906&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070946906&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.14763/2019.2.1410

DO - 10.14763/2019.2.1410

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85070946906

VL - 8

JO - Internet Policy Review

JF - Internet Policy Review

SN - 2197-6775

IS - 2

ER -