Temperature dependent power modeling of photovoltaics

Mesude Bayrakci, Yosoon Choi, Jeffrey Brownson

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Photovoltaic (PV) systems in the USA are often perceived as useful only in warm and sunny climate regions. However, PV systems can be installed and operated in cold regions as well, including places that get snow. Sunlight is the source of electricity, and thermal heat is not required to generate electricity in PV systems. Given similar irradiation conditions, lower PV-cell temperatures can lead to increases in efficiency, which leads to an increase in power generation, thus allowing the user to benefit more from the PV technology. This study focuses on the relationship between the level of energy production and varying temperatures. Two models have been developed to show temperature effect on photovoltaic systems, using transient systems simulation (TRNSYS), a FORTRAN-based modular program to assess solar conversion and heat transfer. The first model (Model A) ignores temperature and the other (Model B) takes it into consideration. In Model A, the efficiency was assumed to be constant through the year. In Model B, the temperature and the resulting efficiency change of the PV cells are defined according to deviations from the nominal operating cell temperature (NOCT), using equations from the literature. These two models were executed for 236 cities across the USA by using second-generation Typical Meteorological Year (TMY) data. These two models calculate discrete outputs of power density, given irradiance and temperature conditions. Comparative analyses were made between these two models. The power output differences for 236 cities across the USA were used to generate contour maps indicating a continuous surface of differences between these two models. Comparing Model B relative to Model A power outputs increase during the months of November to February for the Northeast and the Midwest regions of the USA (16% -20 %), whereas they decrease slightly in May to August (-4%). On the other hand, power outputs decrease considerably from May to August for the South and Southwest of the USA (- 12% - 15%), whereas they increase slightly from December to February (5%). Geospatial trends show two different behaviours in winter time and in summer time due to ambient temperature.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)745-754
Number of pages10
JournalEnergy Procedia
Volume57
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014
Event2013 ISES Solar World Congress, SWC 2013 - Cancun, Mexico
Duration: Nov 3 2013Nov 7 2013

Fingerprint

Temperature
Photovoltaic cells
Electricity
Snow
Thermal effects
Power generation
Irradiation
Heat transfer
Hot Temperature

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Energy(all)

Cite this

Bayrakci, Mesude ; Choi, Yosoon ; Brownson, Jeffrey. / Temperature dependent power modeling of photovoltaics. In: Energy Procedia. 2014 ; Vol. 57. pp. 745-754.
@article{a21e24941df746eeb14f5ce118310344,
title = "Temperature dependent power modeling of photovoltaics",
abstract = "Photovoltaic (PV) systems in the USA are often perceived as useful only in warm and sunny climate regions. However, PV systems can be installed and operated in cold regions as well, including places that get snow. Sunlight is the source of electricity, and thermal heat is not required to generate electricity in PV systems. Given similar irradiation conditions, lower PV-cell temperatures can lead to increases in efficiency, which leads to an increase in power generation, thus allowing the user to benefit more from the PV technology. This study focuses on the relationship between the level of energy production and varying temperatures. Two models have been developed to show temperature effect on photovoltaic systems, using transient systems simulation (TRNSYS), a FORTRAN-based modular program to assess solar conversion and heat transfer. The first model (Model A) ignores temperature and the other (Model B) takes it into consideration. In Model A, the efficiency was assumed to be constant through the year. In Model B, the temperature and the resulting efficiency change of the PV cells are defined according to deviations from the nominal operating cell temperature (NOCT), using equations from the literature. These two models were executed for 236 cities across the USA by using second-generation Typical Meteorological Year (TMY) data. These two models calculate discrete outputs of power density, given irradiance and temperature conditions. Comparative analyses were made between these two models. The power output differences for 236 cities across the USA were used to generate contour maps indicating a continuous surface of differences between these two models. Comparing Model B relative to Model A power outputs increase during the months of November to February for the Northeast and the Midwest regions of the USA (16{\%} -20 {\%}), whereas they decrease slightly in May to August (-4{\%}). On the other hand, power outputs decrease considerably from May to August for the South and Southwest of the USA (- 12{\%} - 15{\%}), whereas they increase slightly from December to February (5{\%}). Geospatial trends show two different behaviours in winter time and in summer time due to ambient temperature.",
author = "Mesude Bayrakci and Yosoon Choi and Jeffrey Brownson",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.egypro.2014.10.282",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "57",
pages = "745--754",
journal = "Energy Procedia",
issn = "1876-6102",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

Temperature dependent power modeling of photovoltaics. / Bayrakci, Mesude; Choi, Yosoon; Brownson, Jeffrey.

In: Energy Procedia, Vol. 57, 01.01.2014, p. 745-754.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Temperature dependent power modeling of photovoltaics

AU - Bayrakci, Mesude

AU - Choi, Yosoon

AU - Brownson, Jeffrey

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Photovoltaic (PV) systems in the USA are often perceived as useful only in warm and sunny climate regions. However, PV systems can be installed and operated in cold regions as well, including places that get snow. Sunlight is the source of electricity, and thermal heat is not required to generate electricity in PV systems. Given similar irradiation conditions, lower PV-cell temperatures can lead to increases in efficiency, which leads to an increase in power generation, thus allowing the user to benefit more from the PV technology. This study focuses on the relationship between the level of energy production and varying temperatures. Two models have been developed to show temperature effect on photovoltaic systems, using transient systems simulation (TRNSYS), a FORTRAN-based modular program to assess solar conversion and heat transfer. The first model (Model A) ignores temperature and the other (Model B) takes it into consideration. In Model A, the efficiency was assumed to be constant through the year. In Model B, the temperature and the resulting efficiency change of the PV cells are defined according to deviations from the nominal operating cell temperature (NOCT), using equations from the literature. These two models were executed for 236 cities across the USA by using second-generation Typical Meteorological Year (TMY) data. These two models calculate discrete outputs of power density, given irradiance and temperature conditions. Comparative analyses were made between these two models. The power output differences for 236 cities across the USA were used to generate contour maps indicating a continuous surface of differences between these two models. Comparing Model B relative to Model A power outputs increase during the months of November to February for the Northeast and the Midwest regions of the USA (16% -20 %), whereas they decrease slightly in May to August (-4%). On the other hand, power outputs decrease considerably from May to August for the South and Southwest of the USA (- 12% - 15%), whereas they increase slightly from December to February (5%). Geospatial trends show two different behaviours in winter time and in summer time due to ambient temperature.

AB - Photovoltaic (PV) systems in the USA are often perceived as useful only in warm and sunny climate regions. However, PV systems can be installed and operated in cold regions as well, including places that get snow. Sunlight is the source of electricity, and thermal heat is not required to generate electricity in PV systems. Given similar irradiation conditions, lower PV-cell temperatures can lead to increases in efficiency, which leads to an increase in power generation, thus allowing the user to benefit more from the PV technology. This study focuses on the relationship between the level of energy production and varying temperatures. Two models have been developed to show temperature effect on photovoltaic systems, using transient systems simulation (TRNSYS), a FORTRAN-based modular program to assess solar conversion and heat transfer. The first model (Model A) ignores temperature and the other (Model B) takes it into consideration. In Model A, the efficiency was assumed to be constant through the year. In Model B, the temperature and the resulting efficiency change of the PV cells are defined according to deviations from the nominal operating cell temperature (NOCT), using equations from the literature. These two models were executed for 236 cities across the USA by using second-generation Typical Meteorological Year (TMY) data. These two models calculate discrete outputs of power density, given irradiance and temperature conditions. Comparative analyses were made between these two models. The power output differences for 236 cities across the USA were used to generate contour maps indicating a continuous surface of differences between these two models. Comparing Model B relative to Model A power outputs increase during the months of November to February for the Northeast and the Midwest regions of the USA (16% -20 %), whereas they decrease slightly in May to August (-4%). On the other hand, power outputs decrease considerably from May to August for the South and Southwest of the USA (- 12% - 15%), whereas they increase slightly from December to February (5%). Geospatial trends show two different behaviours in winter time and in summer time due to ambient temperature.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922325226&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922325226&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.10.282

DO - 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.10.282

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:84922325226

VL - 57

SP - 745

EP - 754

JO - Energy Procedia

JF - Energy Procedia

SN - 1876-6102

ER -