Tempting foods and the affordability axiom: Food cues change beliefs about the costs of healthy eating

Sarah E. Hill, Kaily Baskett, Hannah K. Bradshaw, Marjorie L. Prokosch, Danielle DelPriore, Christopher D. Rodeheffer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many consumers report that healthy eating is more expensive than unhealthy eating (the affordability axiom). We hypothesize that endorsement of this belief may be driven by the motivation to eat unhealthy foods. We tested this hypothesis in three studies. Study 1 revealed that the affordability axiom is associated with poorer eating habits and higher Body Mass Index (BMI). Study 2 found that the presence of a tasty food cue in the environment increased endorsement of affordability axiom. Study 3 found that these effects were moderated by one's food intake goals. Food cues led non-dieters to increase endorsement of the affordability axiom, but had the opposite effect among those seeking to restrict their calorie intake. The affordability axiom might persist as a means of validating unhealthy food choices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)274-279
Number of pages6
JournalAppetite
Volume107
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

Fingerprint

Cues
Costs and Cost Analysis
Food
Eating
Feeding Behavior
Motivation
Body Mass Index
Healthy Diet

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychology(all)
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Cite this

Hill, Sarah E. ; Baskett, Kaily ; Bradshaw, Hannah K. ; Prokosch, Marjorie L. ; DelPriore, Danielle ; Rodeheffer, Christopher D. / Tempting foods and the affordability axiom : Food cues change beliefs about the costs of healthy eating. In: Appetite. 2016 ; Vol. 107. pp. 274-279.
@article{40d85b4335f443a381fa904586307f4a,
title = "Tempting foods and the affordability axiom: Food cues change beliefs about the costs of healthy eating",
abstract = "Many consumers report that healthy eating is more expensive than unhealthy eating (the affordability axiom). We hypothesize that endorsement of this belief may be driven by the motivation to eat unhealthy foods. We tested this hypothesis in three studies. Study 1 revealed that the affordability axiom is associated with poorer eating habits and higher Body Mass Index (BMI). Study 2 found that the presence of a tasty food cue in the environment increased endorsement of affordability axiom. Study 3 found that these effects were moderated by one's food intake goals. Food cues led non-dieters to increase endorsement of the affordability axiom, but had the opposite effect among those seeking to restrict their calorie intake. The affordability axiom might persist as a means of validating unhealthy food choices.",
author = "Hill, {Sarah E.} and Kaily Baskett and Bradshaw, {Hannah K.} and Prokosch, {Marjorie L.} and Danielle DelPriore and Rodeheffer, {Christopher D.}",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.appet.2016.08.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "107",
pages = "274--279",
journal = "Appetite",
issn = "0195-6663",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

Tempting foods and the affordability axiom : Food cues change beliefs about the costs of healthy eating. / Hill, Sarah E.; Baskett, Kaily; Bradshaw, Hannah K.; Prokosch, Marjorie L.; DelPriore, Danielle; Rodeheffer, Christopher D.

In: Appetite, Vol. 107, 01.12.2016, p. 274-279.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tempting foods and the affordability axiom

T2 - Food cues change beliefs about the costs of healthy eating

AU - Hill, Sarah E.

AU - Baskett, Kaily

AU - Bradshaw, Hannah K.

AU - Prokosch, Marjorie L.

AU - DelPriore, Danielle

AU - Rodeheffer, Christopher D.

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - Many consumers report that healthy eating is more expensive than unhealthy eating (the affordability axiom). We hypothesize that endorsement of this belief may be driven by the motivation to eat unhealthy foods. We tested this hypothesis in three studies. Study 1 revealed that the affordability axiom is associated with poorer eating habits and higher Body Mass Index (BMI). Study 2 found that the presence of a tasty food cue in the environment increased endorsement of affordability axiom. Study 3 found that these effects were moderated by one's food intake goals. Food cues led non-dieters to increase endorsement of the affordability axiom, but had the opposite effect among those seeking to restrict their calorie intake. The affordability axiom might persist as a means of validating unhealthy food choices.

AB - Many consumers report that healthy eating is more expensive than unhealthy eating (the affordability axiom). We hypothesize that endorsement of this belief may be driven by the motivation to eat unhealthy foods. We tested this hypothesis in three studies. Study 1 revealed that the affordability axiom is associated with poorer eating habits and higher Body Mass Index (BMI). Study 2 found that the presence of a tasty food cue in the environment increased endorsement of affordability axiom. Study 3 found that these effects were moderated by one's food intake goals. Food cues led non-dieters to increase endorsement of the affordability axiom, but had the opposite effect among those seeking to restrict their calorie intake. The affordability axiom might persist as a means of validating unhealthy food choices.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983455003&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983455003&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.appet.2016.08.014

DO - 10.1016/j.appet.2016.08.014

M3 - Article

C2 - 27524656

AN - SCOPUS:84983455003

VL - 107

SP - 274

EP - 279

JO - Appetite

JF - Appetite

SN - 0195-6663

ER -