Testing an Intervention for Recognizing and Reporting Subtle Gender Bias in Promotion and Tenure Decisions

Jessica L. Cundiff, Cinnamon L. Danube, Matthew J. Zawadzki, Stephanie A. Shields

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Women make up the majority of doctoral degree earners yet remain underrepresented in tenure-track positions within the academy. Gender disparities result in part from the accumulation of subtle, typically unintentional biases that pervade workplace structures, practices, and patterns of interactions that inadvertently favor men. However, the subtle nature of gender bias makes it difficult to detect and thus diminishes the likelihood of action to address it. We experimentally evaluated the effectiveness of a brief intervention, the Workshop Activity for Gender Equity Simulation in the Academy (WAGES-Academic), which was designed to increase recognition of subtle gender bias in the academic workplace. Participants (N = 177) completed either the WAGES intervention or one of two control conditions and later evaluated promotion and tenure materials of a woman faculty member who received either a blatant sexist, subtle sexist, or nonsexist review. Consistent with hypotheses, WAGES participants (vs. controls) detected more subtle gender bias (ps <.02) and were subsequently more likely to report concerns about bias (ps <.04). Results suggest that low-cost interventions that educate individuals about subtle bias in a nonthreatening way may increase detection and reporting of gender bias in higher education institutions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)611-636
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Higher Education
Volume89
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 3 2018

Fingerprint

promotion
gender
trend
academy
workplace
equity
simulation
costs
interaction
education

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education

Cite this

Cundiff, Jessica L. ; Danube, Cinnamon L. ; Zawadzki, Matthew J. ; Shields, Stephanie A. / Testing an Intervention for Recognizing and Reporting Subtle Gender Bias in Promotion and Tenure Decisions. In: Journal of Higher Education. 2018 ; Vol. 89, No. 5. pp. 611-636.
@article{2739911d0da24717874b22780046ba63,
title = "Testing an Intervention for Recognizing and Reporting Subtle Gender Bias in Promotion and Tenure Decisions",
abstract = "Women make up the majority of doctoral degree earners yet remain underrepresented in tenure-track positions within the academy. Gender disparities result in part from the accumulation of subtle, typically unintentional biases that pervade workplace structures, practices, and patterns of interactions that inadvertently favor men. However, the subtle nature of gender bias makes it difficult to detect and thus diminishes the likelihood of action to address it. We experimentally evaluated the effectiveness of a brief intervention, the Workshop Activity for Gender Equity Simulation in the Academy (WAGES-Academic), which was designed to increase recognition of subtle gender bias in the academic workplace. Participants (N = 177) completed either the WAGES intervention or one of two control conditions and later evaluated promotion and tenure materials of a woman faculty member who received either a blatant sexist, subtle sexist, or nonsexist review. Consistent with hypotheses, WAGES participants (vs. controls) detected more subtle gender bias (ps <.02) and were subsequently more likely to report concerns about bias (ps <.04). Results suggest that low-cost interventions that educate individuals about subtle bias in a nonthreatening way may increase detection and reporting of gender bias in higher education institutions.",
author = "Cundiff, {Jessica L.} and Danube, {Cinnamon L.} and Zawadzki, {Matthew J.} and Shields, {Stephanie A.}",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/00221546.2018.1437665",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "89",
pages = "611--636",
journal = "Journal of Higher Education",
issn = "0022-1546",
publisher = "Ohio State University Press",
number = "5",

}

Testing an Intervention for Recognizing and Reporting Subtle Gender Bias in Promotion and Tenure Decisions. / Cundiff, Jessica L.; Danube, Cinnamon L.; Zawadzki, Matthew J.; Shields, Stephanie A.

In: Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 89, No. 5, 03.09.2018, p. 611-636.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Testing an Intervention for Recognizing and Reporting Subtle Gender Bias in Promotion and Tenure Decisions

AU - Cundiff, Jessica L.

AU - Danube, Cinnamon L.

AU - Zawadzki, Matthew J.

AU - Shields, Stephanie A.

PY - 2018/9/3

Y1 - 2018/9/3

N2 - Women make up the majority of doctoral degree earners yet remain underrepresented in tenure-track positions within the academy. Gender disparities result in part from the accumulation of subtle, typically unintentional biases that pervade workplace structures, practices, and patterns of interactions that inadvertently favor men. However, the subtle nature of gender bias makes it difficult to detect and thus diminishes the likelihood of action to address it. We experimentally evaluated the effectiveness of a brief intervention, the Workshop Activity for Gender Equity Simulation in the Academy (WAGES-Academic), which was designed to increase recognition of subtle gender bias in the academic workplace. Participants (N = 177) completed either the WAGES intervention or one of two control conditions and later evaluated promotion and tenure materials of a woman faculty member who received either a blatant sexist, subtle sexist, or nonsexist review. Consistent with hypotheses, WAGES participants (vs. controls) detected more subtle gender bias (ps <.02) and were subsequently more likely to report concerns about bias (ps <.04). Results suggest that low-cost interventions that educate individuals about subtle bias in a nonthreatening way may increase detection and reporting of gender bias in higher education institutions.

AB - Women make up the majority of doctoral degree earners yet remain underrepresented in tenure-track positions within the academy. Gender disparities result in part from the accumulation of subtle, typically unintentional biases that pervade workplace structures, practices, and patterns of interactions that inadvertently favor men. However, the subtle nature of gender bias makes it difficult to detect and thus diminishes the likelihood of action to address it. We experimentally evaluated the effectiveness of a brief intervention, the Workshop Activity for Gender Equity Simulation in the Academy (WAGES-Academic), which was designed to increase recognition of subtle gender bias in the academic workplace. Participants (N = 177) completed either the WAGES intervention or one of two control conditions and later evaluated promotion and tenure materials of a woman faculty member who received either a blatant sexist, subtle sexist, or nonsexist review. Consistent with hypotheses, WAGES participants (vs. controls) detected more subtle gender bias (ps <.02) and were subsequently more likely to report concerns about bias (ps <.04). Results suggest that low-cost interventions that educate individuals about subtle bias in a nonthreatening way may increase detection and reporting of gender bias in higher education institutions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055189565&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055189565&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00221546.2018.1437665

DO - 10.1080/00221546.2018.1437665

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85055189565

VL - 89

SP - 611

EP - 636

JO - Journal of Higher Education

JF - Journal of Higher Education

SN - 0022-1546

IS - 5

ER -