The acid attack on Victor Riesel and fears of labor racketeering in Cold War America

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

When a hired thug hurled acid in the face of the prominent newspaper columnist, Victor Riesel, in 1956, the attack left him permanently blind. The incident appeared to dramatically vindicate Riesel's repeated warnings about the dangerous power of labor racketeers and it helped spur the creation of the largest ever congressional investigation into union corruption, the McClellan Committee hearings (1957-1959). This article raises important questions about the accepted version of why this attack occurred and what it meant. It uses recently released documents from the FBI as well as records from the McClellan Committee's staff. The article also suggests that several governmental bodies, including the FBI and the US Attorney's Office, played a role in furthering the public's misunderstanding of this episode. In so doing it offers a new understanding about how the issue of union corruption came to assume an important place on the nation's political agenda in this era.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)228-247
Number of pages20
JournalLabor History
Volume55
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Attack
Cold War
Labor
Corruption
Misunderstanding
Columnist
Political Agenda
Staff
Hearing
Warning
Incidents
Agenda

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • History
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

@article{e2a7279205f64394aee131394021fb91,
title = "The acid attack on Victor Riesel and fears of labor racketeering in Cold War America",
abstract = "When a hired thug hurled acid in the face of the prominent newspaper columnist, Victor Riesel, in 1956, the attack left him permanently blind. The incident appeared to dramatically vindicate Riesel's repeated warnings about the dangerous power of labor racketeers and it helped spur the creation of the largest ever congressional investigation into union corruption, the McClellan Committee hearings (1957-1959). This article raises important questions about the accepted version of why this attack occurred and what it meant. It uses recently released documents from the FBI as well as records from the McClellan Committee's staff. The article also suggests that several governmental bodies, including the FBI and the US Attorney's Office, played a role in furthering the public's misunderstanding of this episode. In so doing it offers a new understanding about how the issue of union corruption came to assume an important place on the nation's political agenda in this era.",
author = "Witwer, {David Scott}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/0023656X.2014.894218",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "228--247",
journal = "Labor History",
issn = "0023-656X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

The acid attack on Victor Riesel and fears of labor racketeering in Cold War America. / Witwer, David Scott.

In: Labor History, Vol. 55, No. 2, 01.01.2014, p. 228-247.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The acid attack on Victor Riesel and fears of labor racketeering in Cold War America

AU - Witwer, David Scott

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - When a hired thug hurled acid in the face of the prominent newspaper columnist, Victor Riesel, in 1956, the attack left him permanently blind. The incident appeared to dramatically vindicate Riesel's repeated warnings about the dangerous power of labor racketeers and it helped spur the creation of the largest ever congressional investigation into union corruption, the McClellan Committee hearings (1957-1959). This article raises important questions about the accepted version of why this attack occurred and what it meant. It uses recently released documents from the FBI as well as records from the McClellan Committee's staff. The article also suggests that several governmental bodies, including the FBI and the US Attorney's Office, played a role in furthering the public's misunderstanding of this episode. In so doing it offers a new understanding about how the issue of union corruption came to assume an important place on the nation's political agenda in this era.

AB - When a hired thug hurled acid in the face of the prominent newspaper columnist, Victor Riesel, in 1956, the attack left him permanently blind. The incident appeared to dramatically vindicate Riesel's repeated warnings about the dangerous power of labor racketeers and it helped spur the creation of the largest ever congressional investigation into union corruption, the McClellan Committee hearings (1957-1959). This article raises important questions about the accepted version of why this attack occurred and what it meant. It uses recently released documents from the FBI as well as records from the McClellan Committee's staff. The article also suggests that several governmental bodies, including the FBI and the US Attorney's Office, played a role in furthering the public's misunderstanding of this episode. In so doing it offers a new understanding about how the issue of union corruption came to assume an important place on the nation's political agenda in this era.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898906125&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84898906125&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0023656X.2014.894218

DO - 10.1080/0023656X.2014.894218

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84898906125

VL - 55

SP - 228

EP - 247

JO - Labor History

JF - Labor History

SN - 0023-656X

IS - 2

ER -