The Affect and Effect of Images of War on Individual Opinion and Emotions

Scott Sigmund Gartner, Christopher F. Gelpi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We explore the conditions under which individuals are attentive to positive and negative battlefield information when forming beliefs about a conflict’s success or failure. We use three experiments to explore the impact of visual and textual battlefield cues on individuals’ emotional states and attitudes toward the war in Afghanistan. We find that both visual and textual information convey information about failure that influences public attitudes and emotions toward war. In keeping with rational expectations theory, but contrary to widespread beliefs within the journalistic and policymaking communities, textual cues and images of battlefield failure have similar effects on emotions and attitudes. The consistency of multiple war cues, however, greatly affects peoples’ reactions. Simply put, in war the content of information matters, not its delivery style.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)172-188
Number of pages17
JournalInternational Interactions
Volume42
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

emotion
Afghanistan
experiment
community

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

@article{284e0201bb954335b74a02bea5f430ff,
title = "The Affect and Effect of Images of War on Individual Opinion and Emotions",
abstract = "We explore the conditions under which individuals are attentive to positive and negative battlefield information when forming beliefs about a conflict’s success or failure. We use three experiments to explore the impact of visual and textual battlefield cues on individuals’ emotional states and attitudes toward the war in Afghanistan. We find that both visual and textual information convey information about failure that influences public attitudes and emotions toward war. In keeping with rational expectations theory, but contrary to widespread beliefs within the journalistic and policymaking communities, textual cues and images of battlefield failure have similar effects on emotions and attitudes. The consistency of multiple war cues, however, greatly affects peoples’ reactions. Simply put, in war the content of information matters, not its delivery style.",
author = "Gartner, {Scott Sigmund} and Gelpi, {Christopher F.}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/03050629.2015.1051620",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "172--188",
journal = "International Interactions",
issn = "0305-0629",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

The Affect and Effect of Images of War on Individual Opinion and Emotions. / Gartner, Scott Sigmund; Gelpi, Christopher F.

In: International Interactions, Vol. 42, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 172-188.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Affect and Effect of Images of War on Individual Opinion and Emotions

AU - Gartner, Scott Sigmund

AU - Gelpi, Christopher F.

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - We explore the conditions under which individuals are attentive to positive and negative battlefield information when forming beliefs about a conflict’s success or failure. We use three experiments to explore the impact of visual and textual battlefield cues on individuals’ emotional states and attitudes toward the war in Afghanistan. We find that both visual and textual information convey information about failure that influences public attitudes and emotions toward war. In keeping with rational expectations theory, but contrary to widespread beliefs within the journalistic and policymaking communities, textual cues and images of battlefield failure have similar effects on emotions and attitudes. The consistency of multiple war cues, however, greatly affects peoples’ reactions. Simply put, in war the content of information matters, not its delivery style.

AB - We explore the conditions under which individuals are attentive to positive and negative battlefield information when forming beliefs about a conflict’s success or failure. We use three experiments to explore the impact of visual and textual battlefield cues on individuals’ emotional states and attitudes toward the war in Afghanistan. We find that both visual and textual information convey information about failure that influences public attitudes and emotions toward war. In keeping with rational expectations theory, but contrary to widespread beliefs within the journalistic and policymaking communities, textual cues and images of battlefield failure have similar effects on emotions and attitudes. The consistency of multiple war cues, however, greatly affects peoples’ reactions. Simply put, in war the content of information matters, not its delivery style.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958985313&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958985313&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/03050629.2015.1051620

DO - 10.1080/03050629.2015.1051620

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84958985313

VL - 42

SP - 172

EP - 188

JO - International Interactions

JF - International Interactions

SN - 0305-0629

IS - 1

ER -