The allocative efficiency implications of water pollution abatement cost comparisons

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Assessments of the efficiency of water pollution control allocations are usually based on abatement cost comparisons. The general rule is that efficiency is improved by reallocating abatement from sources with high marginal costs to low‐cost sources. The welfare‐theoretic foundation of this rule is well established for situations with nonstochastic emissions. In situations with stochastic emissions, pollution control involves improving the distribution of emissions. Nevertheless, efficiency analyses involving stochastic emissions usually sidestep formal consideration of the stochastic element by measuring pollution control and control costs with respect to changes in long‐term average flows. An economic model of stochastic emissions is used to demonstrate that this approach can give misleading results. An alternative procedure is briefly discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)793-797
Number of pages5
JournalWater Resources Research
Volume26
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1990

Fingerprint

allocative efficiency
abatement cost
water pollution
pollution control
cost
comparison
pollution abatement
economics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

@article{399e671edb50469d855bb3d7341ed638,
title = "The allocative efficiency implications of water pollution abatement cost comparisons",
abstract = "Assessments of the efficiency of water pollution control allocations are usually based on abatement cost comparisons. The general rule is that efficiency is improved by reallocating abatement from sources with high marginal costs to low‐cost sources. The welfare‐theoretic foundation of this rule is well established for situations with nonstochastic emissions. In situations with stochastic emissions, pollution control involves improving the distribution of emissions. Nevertheless, efficiency analyses involving stochastic emissions usually sidestep formal consideration of the stochastic element by measuring pollution control and control costs with respect to changes in long‐term average flows. An economic model of stochastic emissions is used to demonstrate that this approach can give misleading results. An alternative procedure is briefly discussed.",
author = "Shortle, {James S.}",
year = "1990",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1029/WR026i005p00793",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "793--797",
journal = "Water Resources Research",
issn = "0043-1397",
publisher = "American Geophysical Union",
number = "5",

}

The allocative efficiency implications of water pollution abatement cost comparisons. / Shortle, James S.

In: Water Resources Research, Vol. 26, No. 5, 05.1990, p. 793-797.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The allocative efficiency implications of water pollution abatement cost comparisons

AU - Shortle, James S.

PY - 1990/5

Y1 - 1990/5

N2 - Assessments of the efficiency of water pollution control allocations are usually based on abatement cost comparisons. The general rule is that efficiency is improved by reallocating abatement from sources with high marginal costs to low‐cost sources. The welfare‐theoretic foundation of this rule is well established for situations with nonstochastic emissions. In situations with stochastic emissions, pollution control involves improving the distribution of emissions. Nevertheless, efficiency analyses involving stochastic emissions usually sidestep formal consideration of the stochastic element by measuring pollution control and control costs with respect to changes in long‐term average flows. An economic model of stochastic emissions is used to demonstrate that this approach can give misleading results. An alternative procedure is briefly discussed.

AB - Assessments of the efficiency of water pollution control allocations are usually based on abatement cost comparisons. The general rule is that efficiency is improved by reallocating abatement from sources with high marginal costs to low‐cost sources. The welfare‐theoretic foundation of this rule is well established for situations with nonstochastic emissions. In situations with stochastic emissions, pollution control involves improving the distribution of emissions. Nevertheless, efficiency analyses involving stochastic emissions usually sidestep formal consideration of the stochastic element by measuring pollution control and control costs with respect to changes in long‐term average flows. An economic model of stochastic emissions is used to demonstrate that this approach can give misleading results. An alternative procedure is briefly discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025589527&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025589527&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1029/WR026i005p00793

DO - 10.1029/WR026i005p00793

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0025589527

VL - 26

SP - 793

EP - 797

JO - Water Resources Research

JF - Water Resources Research

SN - 0043-1397

IS - 5

ER -