The application of defaults to optimize parents' health-based choices for children

Katharine L. Loeb, Cynthia Radnitz, Kathleen Loralee Keller, Marlene B. Schwartz, Sue Marcus, Richard N. Pierson, Michael Shannon, Danielle DeLaurentis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Optimal defaults is a compelling model from behavioral economics and the psychology of human decision-making, designed to shape or “nudge” choices in a positive direction without fundamentally restricting options. The current study aimed to test the effectiveness of optimal (less obesogenic) defaults and parent empowerment priming on health-based decisions with parent-child (ages 3–8) dyads in a community-based setting. Two proof-of-concept experiments (one on breakfast food selections and one on activity choice) were conducted comparing the main and interactive effects of optimal versus suboptimal defaults, and parent empowerment priming versus neutral priming, on parents' health-related choices for their children. We hypothesized that in each experiment, making the default option more optimal will lead to more frequent health-oriented choices, and that priming parents to be the ultimate decision-makers on behalf of their child's health will potentiate this effect. Results show that in both studies, default condition, but not priming condition or the interaction between default and priming, significantly predicted choice (healthier vs. less healthy option). There was also a significant main effect for default condition (and no effect for priming condition or the interaction term) on the quantity of healthier food children consumed in the breakfast experiment. These pilot studies demonstrate that optimal defaults can be practicably implemented to improve parents' food and activity choices for young children. Results can inform policies and practices pertaining to obesogenic environmental factors in school, restaurant, and home environments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)368-375
Number of pages8
JournalAppetite
Volume113
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2017

Fingerprint

Parents
Breakfast
Health
Behavioral Economics
Food Preferences
Food
Restaurants
Decision Making
Psychology
Power (Psychology)

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychology(all)
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Cite this

Loeb, K. L., Radnitz, C., Keller, K. L., Schwartz, M. B., Marcus, S., Pierson, R. N., ... DeLaurentis, D. (2017). The application of defaults to optimize parents' health-based choices for children. Appetite, 113, 368-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.02.039
Loeb, Katharine L. ; Radnitz, Cynthia ; Keller, Kathleen Loralee ; Schwartz, Marlene B. ; Marcus, Sue ; Pierson, Richard N. ; Shannon, Michael ; DeLaurentis, Danielle. / The application of defaults to optimize parents' health-based choices for children. In: Appetite. 2017 ; Vol. 113. pp. 368-375.
@article{1abe0187b9b342e0af0dd88b784ccf78,
title = "The application of defaults to optimize parents' health-based choices for children",
abstract = "Optimal defaults is a compelling model from behavioral economics and the psychology of human decision-making, designed to shape or “nudge” choices in a positive direction without fundamentally restricting options. The current study aimed to test the effectiveness of optimal (less obesogenic) defaults and parent empowerment priming on health-based decisions with parent-child (ages 3–8) dyads in a community-based setting. Two proof-of-concept experiments (one on breakfast food selections and one on activity choice) were conducted comparing the main and interactive effects of optimal versus suboptimal defaults, and parent empowerment priming versus neutral priming, on parents' health-related choices for their children. We hypothesized that in each experiment, making the default option more optimal will lead to more frequent health-oriented choices, and that priming parents to be the ultimate decision-makers on behalf of their child's health will potentiate this effect. Results show that in both studies, default condition, but not priming condition or the interaction between default and priming, significantly predicted choice (healthier vs. less healthy option). There was also a significant main effect for default condition (and no effect for priming condition or the interaction term) on the quantity of healthier food children consumed in the breakfast experiment. These pilot studies demonstrate that optimal defaults can be practicably implemented to improve parents' food and activity choices for young children. Results can inform policies and practices pertaining to obesogenic environmental factors in school, restaurant, and home environments.",
author = "Loeb, {Katharine L.} and Cynthia Radnitz and Keller, {Kathleen Loralee} and Schwartz, {Marlene B.} and Sue Marcus and Pierson, {Richard N.} and Michael Shannon and Danielle DeLaurentis",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.appet.2017.02.039",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "113",
pages = "368--375",
journal = "Appetite",
issn = "0195-6663",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

Loeb, KL, Radnitz, C, Keller, KL, Schwartz, MB, Marcus, S, Pierson, RN, Shannon, M & DeLaurentis, D 2017, 'The application of defaults to optimize parents' health-based choices for children', Appetite, vol. 113, pp. 368-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.02.039

The application of defaults to optimize parents' health-based choices for children. / Loeb, Katharine L.; Radnitz, Cynthia; Keller, Kathleen Loralee; Schwartz, Marlene B.; Marcus, Sue; Pierson, Richard N.; Shannon, Michael; DeLaurentis, Danielle.

In: Appetite, Vol. 113, 01.06.2017, p. 368-375.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The application of defaults to optimize parents' health-based choices for children

AU - Loeb, Katharine L.

AU - Radnitz, Cynthia

AU - Keller, Kathleen Loralee

AU - Schwartz, Marlene B.

AU - Marcus, Sue

AU - Pierson, Richard N.

AU - Shannon, Michael

AU - DeLaurentis, Danielle

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - Optimal defaults is a compelling model from behavioral economics and the psychology of human decision-making, designed to shape or “nudge” choices in a positive direction without fundamentally restricting options. The current study aimed to test the effectiveness of optimal (less obesogenic) defaults and parent empowerment priming on health-based decisions with parent-child (ages 3–8) dyads in a community-based setting. Two proof-of-concept experiments (one on breakfast food selections and one on activity choice) were conducted comparing the main and interactive effects of optimal versus suboptimal defaults, and parent empowerment priming versus neutral priming, on parents' health-related choices for their children. We hypothesized that in each experiment, making the default option more optimal will lead to more frequent health-oriented choices, and that priming parents to be the ultimate decision-makers on behalf of their child's health will potentiate this effect. Results show that in both studies, default condition, but not priming condition or the interaction between default and priming, significantly predicted choice (healthier vs. less healthy option). There was also a significant main effect for default condition (and no effect for priming condition or the interaction term) on the quantity of healthier food children consumed in the breakfast experiment. These pilot studies demonstrate that optimal defaults can be practicably implemented to improve parents' food and activity choices for young children. Results can inform policies and practices pertaining to obesogenic environmental factors in school, restaurant, and home environments.

AB - Optimal defaults is a compelling model from behavioral economics and the psychology of human decision-making, designed to shape or “nudge” choices in a positive direction without fundamentally restricting options. The current study aimed to test the effectiveness of optimal (less obesogenic) defaults and parent empowerment priming on health-based decisions with parent-child (ages 3–8) dyads in a community-based setting. Two proof-of-concept experiments (one on breakfast food selections and one on activity choice) were conducted comparing the main and interactive effects of optimal versus suboptimal defaults, and parent empowerment priming versus neutral priming, on parents' health-related choices for their children. We hypothesized that in each experiment, making the default option more optimal will lead to more frequent health-oriented choices, and that priming parents to be the ultimate decision-makers on behalf of their child's health will potentiate this effect. Results show that in both studies, default condition, but not priming condition or the interaction between default and priming, significantly predicted choice (healthier vs. less healthy option). There was also a significant main effect for default condition (and no effect for priming condition or the interaction term) on the quantity of healthier food children consumed in the breakfast experiment. These pilot studies demonstrate that optimal defaults can be practicably implemented to improve parents' food and activity choices for young children. Results can inform policies and practices pertaining to obesogenic environmental factors in school, restaurant, and home environments.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015321355&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015321355&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.appet.2017.02.039

DO - 10.1016/j.appet.2017.02.039

M3 - Article

C2 - 28257942

AN - SCOPUS:85015321355

VL - 113

SP - 368

EP - 375

JO - Appetite

JF - Appetite

SN - 0195-6663

ER -