TY - JOUR
T1 - The assessment of herbaceous plant cover in wetlands as an indicator of function
AU - Cole, Charles Andrew
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was funded through a contract with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station (DACW42-00-P-0500). I am grateful for the help provided by J. Kratzer, without whose assistance in poring through files, and with navigation to sites, this project would have not been possible. Thanks to T. Pluto of the Baltimore District, Corps of Engineers, for allowing unlimited access to his files. I also appreciate the advice and guidance provided by W. Streever of British Petroleum (formerly of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). Thanks to three anonymous reviewers whose comments greatly improved this paper.
PY - 2002/12
Y1 - 2002/12
N2 - In the United States, wetlands are often created (as compared with restored) as mitigation for damage done to natural wetlands by development or other activities. There is increasing concern that these created sites do not function as do natural wetlands, even after a period of years. Monitoring of these created wetlands often consists of an assessment of the percent herbaceous plant cover as some indicator of the functional success of the wetland. However, it is not at all clear that assessment of herbaceous cover translates into an accurate indicator of wetland function. In this paper I review several functions commonly ascribed to wetlands and assess the reported relationship of percent herbaceous cover to those functions (if any). Of six functions reviewed, only one has a probable (though indirect) positive relationship with the percent herbaceous plant cover on a site. More useful assessments of wetland function might be made with other structural indicators, such as basin morphometry, tree density, or basal area.
AB - In the United States, wetlands are often created (as compared with restored) as mitigation for damage done to natural wetlands by development or other activities. There is increasing concern that these created sites do not function as do natural wetlands, even after a period of years. Monitoring of these created wetlands often consists of an assessment of the percent herbaceous plant cover as some indicator of the functional success of the wetland. However, it is not at all clear that assessment of herbaceous cover translates into an accurate indicator of wetland function. In this paper I review several functions commonly ascribed to wetlands and assess the reported relationship of percent herbaceous cover to those functions (if any). Of six functions reviewed, only one has a probable (though indirect) positive relationship with the percent herbaceous plant cover on a site. More useful assessments of wetland function might be made with other structural indicators, such as basin morphometry, tree density, or basal area.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0141958531&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0141958531&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S1470-160X(02)00064-X
DO - 10.1016/S1470-160X(02)00064-X
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0141958531
SN - 1470-160X
VL - 2
SP - 287
EP - 293
JO - Ecological Indicators
JF - Ecological Indicators
IS - 3
ER -