The association between an ultrabrief cognitive screening in older adults and hospital outcomes

Andrea M. Yevchak, Kelly Doherty, Elizabeth G. Archambault, Brittany Kelly, Jennifer R. Fonda, James L. Rudolph

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Though often recommended, hospital cognitive assessment is infrequently completed due to clinical and time constraints. OBJECTIVE: This analysis aimed to evaluate the relationship between performance on ultrabrief cognitive screening instruments and hospital outcomes. DESIGN: This is a secondary data analysis of a quality improvement project. SETTING: Tertiary Veterans Administration hospital in New England. PATIENTS: Patients,≥60 years old, admitted to the hospital. INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENTS: Upon admission, patients were administered 2 cognitive screening tools. The modified Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (mRASS) is a measure of arousal that can be completed in 15 seconds. The months of the year backward (MOYB) is a measure of attention that can be administered in ≤1 minute. In-hospital outcomes included restraints and mortality, whereas discharge outcomes included length of stay, discharge not home, and variable direct costs. Risk ratios were calculated for dichotomous outcomes and unadjusted Poisson regression for continuous outcomes. RESULTS: Patients (n=3232) were screened. Altered arousal occurred in 15% of patients (n=495); incorrect MOYB was recorded in 45% (n=1457). Relative to those with normal arousal and attention, those with abnormal mRASS and incorrect MOYB had increased length of stay (incident rate ratio [IRR]: 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17-1.30); restraint use (risk ratio [RR]: 5.05, 95% CI: 3.29-7.75), in-hospital mortality (RR: 3.46, 95% CI: 1.24-9.63), and decreased discharge home (RR: 2.97, 95% CI: 2.42-3.64). Hospital variable direct costs were slightly, but not significantly, higher (IRR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.88-1.17). CONCLUSION: Impaired performance on ultrabrief cognitive assessments of arousal and attention provide valuable insights regarding hospital outcomes. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2015;10:651-657. 2015 Society of Hospital Medicine

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)651-657
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Hospital Medicine
Volume10
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2015

Fingerprint

Arousal
Confidence Intervals
Odds Ratio
Length of Stay
Hospital Medicine
Veterans Hospitals
Costs and Cost Analysis
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
New England
Patient Admission
Quality Improvement
Hospital Mortality
Tertiary Care Centers
Mortality

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Leadership and Management
  • Fundamentals and skills
  • Health Policy
  • Care Planning
  • Assessment and Diagnosis

Cite this

Yevchak, Andrea M. ; Doherty, Kelly ; Archambault, Elizabeth G. ; Kelly, Brittany ; Fonda, Jennifer R. ; Rudolph, James L. / The association between an ultrabrief cognitive screening in older adults and hospital outcomes. In: Journal of Hospital Medicine. 2015 ; Vol. 10, No. 10. pp. 651-657.
@article{919fcba6eb674dce8e8dce558da97bf9,
title = "The association between an ultrabrief cognitive screening in older adults and hospital outcomes",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Though often recommended, hospital cognitive assessment is infrequently completed due to clinical and time constraints. OBJECTIVE: This analysis aimed to evaluate the relationship between performance on ultrabrief cognitive screening instruments and hospital outcomes. DESIGN: This is a secondary data analysis of a quality improvement project. SETTING: Tertiary Veterans Administration hospital in New England. PATIENTS: Patients,≥60 years old, admitted to the hospital. INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENTS: Upon admission, patients were administered 2 cognitive screening tools. The modified Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (mRASS) is a measure of arousal that can be completed in 15 seconds. The months of the year backward (MOYB) is a measure of attention that can be administered in ≤1 minute. In-hospital outcomes included restraints and mortality, whereas discharge outcomes included length of stay, discharge not home, and variable direct costs. Risk ratios were calculated for dichotomous outcomes and unadjusted Poisson regression for continuous outcomes. RESULTS: Patients (n=3232) were screened. Altered arousal occurred in 15{\%} of patients (n=495); incorrect MOYB was recorded in 45{\%} (n=1457). Relative to those with normal arousal and attention, those with abnormal mRASS and incorrect MOYB had increased length of stay (incident rate ratio [IRR]: 1.23, 95{\%} confidence interval [CI]: 1.17-1.30); restraint use (risk ratio [RR]: 5.05, 95{\%} CI: 3.29-7.75), in-hospital mortality (RR: 3.46, 95{\%} CI: 1.24-9.63), and decreased discharge home (RR: 2.97, 95{\%} CI: 2.42-3.64). Hospital variable direct costs were slightly, but not significantly, higher (IRR: 1.02, 95{\%} CI: 0.88-1.17). CONCLUSION: Impaired performance on ultrabrief cognitive assessments of arousal and attention provide valuable insights regarding hospital outcomes. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2015;10:651-657. 2015 Society of Hospital Medicine",
author = "Yevchak, {Andrea M.} and Kelly Doherty and Archambault, {Elizabeth G.} and Brittany Kelly and Fonda, {Jennifer R.} and Rudolph, {James L.}",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/jhm.2450",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "651--657",
journal = "Journal of Hospital Medicine",
issn = "1553-5606",
publisher = "Society of Hospital Medicine",
number = "10",

}

The association between an ultrabrief cognitive screening in older adults and hospital outcomes. / Yevchak, Andrea M.; Doherty, Kelly; Archambault, Elizabeth G.; Kelly, Brittany; Fonda, Jennifer R.; Rudolph, James L.

In: Journal of Hospital Medicine, Vol. 10, No. 10, 01.10.2015, p. 651-657.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The association between an ultrabrief cognitive screening in older adults and hospital outcomes

AU - Yevchak, Andrea M.

AU - Doherty, Kelly

AU - Archambault, Elizabeth G.

AU - Kelly, Brittany

AU - Fonda, Jennifer R.

AU - Rudolph, James L.

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Though often recommended, hospital cognitive assessment is infrequently completed due to clinical and time constraints. OBJECTIVE: This analysis aimed to evaluate the relationship between performance on ultrabrief cognitive screening instruments and hospital outcomes. DESIGN: This is a secondary data analysis of a quality improvement project. SETTING: Tertiary Veterans Administration hospital in New England. PATIENTS: Patients,≥60 years old, admitted to the hospital. INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENTS: Upon admission, patients were administered 2 cognitive screening tools. The modified Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (mRASS) is a measure of arousal that can be completed in 15 seconds. The months of the year backward (MOYB) is a measure of attention that can be administered in ≤1 minute. In-hospital outcomes included restraints and mortality, whereas discharge outcomes included length of stay, discharge not home, and variable direct costs. Risk ratios were calculated for dichotomous outcomes and unadjusted Poisson regression for continuous outcomes. RESULTS: Patients (n=3232) were screened. Altered arousal occurred in 15% of patients (n=495); incorrect MOYB was recorded in 45% (n=1457). Relative to those with normal arousal and attention, those with abnormal mRASS and incorrect MOYB had increased length of stay (incident rate ratio [IRR]: 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17-1.30); restraint use (risk ratio [RR]: 5.05, 95% CI: 3.29-7.75), in-hospital mortality (RR: 3.46, 95% CI: 1.24-9.63), and decreased discharge home (RR: 2.97, 95% CI: 2.42-3.64). Hospital variable direct costs were slightly, but not significantly, higher (IRR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.88-1.17). CONCLUSION: Impaired performance on ultrabrief cognitive assessments of arousal and attention provide valuable insights regarding hospital outcomes. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2015;10:651-657. 2015 Society of Hospital Medicine

AB - BACKGROUND: Though often recommended, hospital cognitive assessment is infrequently completed due to clinical and time constraints. OBJECTIVE: This analysis aimed to evaluate the relationship between performance on ultrabrief cognitive screening instruments and hospital outcomes. DESIGN: This is a secondary data analysis of a quality improvement project. SETTING: Tertiary Veterans Administration hospital in New England. PATIENTS: Patients,≥60 years old, admitted to the hospital. INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENTS: Upon admission, patients were administered 2 cognitive screening tools. The modified Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (mRASS) is a measure of arousal that can be completed in 15 seconds. The months of the year backward (MOYB) is a measure of attention that can be administered in ≤1 minute. In-hospital outcomes included restraints and mortality, whereas discharge outcomes included length of stay, discharge not home, and variable direct costs. Risk ratios were calculated for dichotomous outcomes and unadjusted Poisson regression for continuous outcomes. RESULTS: Patients (n=3232) were screened. Altered arousal occurred in 15% of patients (n=495); incorrect MOYB was recorded in 45% (n=1457). Relative to those with normal arousal and attention, those with abnormal mRASS and incorrect MOYB had increased length of stay (incident rate ratio [IRR]: 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17-1.30); restraint use (risk ratio [RR]: 5.05, 95% CI: 3.29-7.75), in-hospital mortality (RR: 3.46, 95% CI: 1.24-9.63), and decreased discharge home (RR: 2.97, 95% CI: 2.42-3.64). Hospital variable direct costs were slightly, but not significantly, higher (IRR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.88-1.17). CONCLUSION: Impaired performance on ultrabrief cognitive assessments of arousal and attention provide valuable insights regarding hospital outcomes. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2015;10:651-657. 2015 Society of Hospital Medicine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942990556&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942990556&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jhm.2450

DO - 10.1002/jhm.2450

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 651

EP - 657

JO - Journal of Hospital Medicine

JF - Journal of Hospital Medicine

SN - 1553-5606

IS - 10

ER -