The authors reply

Samuel A. Tisherman; Antionette Spevetz; Sandralee A. Blosser; Daniel Brown; Cherylee Chang; Philip A. Efron; Michael O'Connor; Jonathan E. Sevransky; Brian T. Wessman

doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000003691

The authors reply

Samuel A. Tisherman, Antionette Spevetz, Sandralee A. Blosser, Daniel Brown, Cherylee Chang, Philip A. Efron, Michael O'Connor, Jonathan E. Sevransky, Brian T. Wessman

Department of Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	e429
Journal	Critical care medicine
Volume	47
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000003691
State	Published - May 1 2019

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Access to Document

10.1097/CCM.0000000000003691

Cite this

@article{bea4d085040e42e3b5e6373c02fa2658,

title = "The authors reply",

author = "Tisherman, {Samuel A.} and Antionette Spevetz and Blosser, {Sandralee A.} and Daniel Brown and Cherylee Chang and Efron, {Philip A.} and Michael O'Connor and Sevransky, {Jonathan E.} and Wessman, {Brian T.}",

note = "Funding Information: quite exciting. We hope that other countries will follow suit and cultural and resilience factors.comparatively lower in our sample,reflecting probably socio- develop a process for breaking down the silos to encourage in-We wish to highlight few points about the study by terest in the field and to develop common requirements to assure Kredentser et al (1). The results interestingly suggested that that all practitioners are well prepared to provide excellent care. exposure to psychoeducation had higher anxiety and de- We look forward to hearing more about the successes and pression score based on Hospital Anxiety and Depression challenges observed as the French innovations are implemented. Scale. Although these results were in contrast with those Dr. Spevetz disclosed that she represents the Society of Crit-with diary, the outcome was similar for posttraumatic stress ical Care Medicine (SCCM) at American Board of Internal symptoms where both diary and psychoeducation seemed Medicine meetings. Dr. Sevransky{\textquoteright}s institution received fund-to have similar effect; although only psychoeducation had ing from the Marcus Foundation, and he received funding from significant difference. We wonder what could be possible SCCM. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not reasons for this. have any potential conflicts ofinterest. Although in the ICU diary arm, family members and ICU Copyright: Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",

year = "2019",

month = may,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1097/CCM.0000000000003691",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "47",

pages = "e429",

journal = "Critical Care Medicine",

issn = "0090-3493",

publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The authors reply

AU - Tisherman, Samuel A.

AU - Spevetz, Antionette

AU - Blosser, Sandralee A.

AU - Brown, Daniel

AU - Chang, Cherylee

AU - Efron, Philip A.

AU - O'Connor, Michael

AU - Sevransky, Jonathan E.

AU - Wessman, Brian T.

N1 - Funding Information: quite exciting. We hope that other countries will follow suit and cultural and resilience factors.comparatively lower in our sample,reflecting probably socio- develop a process for breaking down the silos to encourage in-We wish to highlight few points about the study by terest in the field and to develop common requirements to assure Kredentser et al (1). The results interestingly suggested that that all practitioners are well prepared to provide excellent care. exposure to psychoeducation had higher anxiety and de- We look forward to hearing more about the successes and pression score based on Hospital Anxiety and Depression challenges observed as the French innovations are implemented. Scale. Although these results were in contrast with those Dr. Spevetz disclosed that she represents the Society of Crit-with diary, the outcome was similar for posttraumatic stress ical Care Medicine (SCCM) at American Board of Internal symptoms where both diary and psychoeducation seemed Medicine meetings. Dr. Sevransky’s institution received fund-to have similar effect; although only psychoeducation had ing from the Marcus Foundation, and he received funding from significant difference. We wonder what could be possible SCCM. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not reasons for this. have any potential conflicts ofinterest. Although in the ICU diary arm, family members and ICU Copyright: Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064852711&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064852711&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003691

DO - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003691

M3 - Letter

C2 - 30985464

AN - SCOPUS:85064852711

VL - 47

SP - e429

JO - Critical Care Medicine

JF - Critical Care Medicine

SN - 0090-3493

IS - 5

ER -

The authors reply

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this