The best papers from BRIMS 2011: Models of users and teams interacting

Frank E. Ritter, William G. Kennedy, Bradley J. Best

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This special issue is similar to our previous special issues (Kennedy et al. in Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 16(3):217-219, 2010; 17(3):225-228, 2011) in that it includes articles based on the award winning conference papers of the, here, 2011 BRiMS Annual Conference. These articles were reviewed by the editors, extended to journal article length, and then peer-reviewed and revised before being accepted. The articles include a new way to evaluate designs of interfaces for safety critical systems (Bolton in Comput. Math. Organ. Theory, 2012), an article that extends our understanding of how to model situation awareness (SA) in a cognitive architecture (Rodgers et al. in Comput. Math. Organ. Theory, 2012), an article that presents electroencephalography (EEG) data used to derive dynamic neurophysiologic models of engagement in teamwork (Stevens et al. in Comput. Math. Organ. Theory, 2012), and an article that demonstrates using machine learning to generate models and an example application of that tool (Best in Comput. Math. Organ. Theory, 2012). After presenting a brief summary of each paper we will see some recurrent themes of task analysis, team and individual models, spatial reasoning, usability issues, and particularly that they are models that interact with each other or systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)283-287
Number of pages5
JournalComputational and Mathematical Organization Theory
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2013

Fingerprint

Spatial Reasoning
Cognitive Architecture
Electroencephalography
Safety-critical Systems
Situation Awareness
Team Work
Model
Learning systems
Dynamic models
Usability
Annual
Dynamic Model
Machine Learning
Evaluate
Demonstrate
Engagement
Design
Machine learning
Peers
Task analysis

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Modeling and Simulation
  • Applied Mathematics
  • Computer Science(all)
  • Decision Sciences(all)
  • Computational Mathematics

Cite this

@article{05e7f6ad271540108f5ce6e0729cf08b,
title = "The best papers from BRIMS 2011: Models of users and teams interacting",
abstract = "This special issue is similar to our previous special issues (Kennedy et al. in Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 16(3):217-219, 2010; 17(3):225-228, 2011) in that it includes articles based on the award winning conference papers of the, here, 2011 BRiMS Annual Conference. These articles were reviewed by the editors, extended to journal article length, and then peer-reviewed and revised before being accepted. The articles include a new way to evaluate designs of interfaces for safety critical systems (Bolton in Comput. Math. Organ. Theory, 2012), an article that extends our understanding of how to model situation awareness (SA) in a cognitive architecture (Rodgers et al. in Comput. Math. Organ. Theory, 2012), an article that presents electroencephalography (EEG) data used to derive dynamic neurophysiologic models of engagement in teamwork (Stevens et al. in Comput. Math. Organ. Theory, 2012), and an article that demonstrates using machine learning to generate models and an example application of that tool (Best in Comput. Math. Organ. Theory, 2012). After presenting a brief summary of each paper we will see some recurrent themes of task analysis, team and individual models, spatial reasoning, usability issues, and particularly that they are models that interact with each other or systems.",
author = "Ritter, {Frank E.} and Kennedy, {William G.} and Best, {Bradley J.}",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10588-012-9140-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "283--287",
journal = "Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory",
issn = "1381-298X",
publisher = "Kluwer Academic Publishers",
number = "3",

}

The best papers from BRIMS 2011 : Models of users and teams interacting. / Ritter, Frank E.; Kennedy, William G.; Best, Bradley J.

In: Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Vol. 19, No. 3, 01.09.2013, p. 283-287.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The best papers from BRIMS 2011

T2 - Models of users and teams interacting

AU - Ritter, Frank E.

AU - Kennedy, William G.

AU - Best, Bradley J.

PY - 2013/9/1

Y1 - 2013/9/1

N2 - This special issue is similar to our previous special issues (Kennedy et al. in Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 16(3):217-219, 2010; 17(3):225-228, 2011) in that it includes articles based on the award winning conference papers of the, here, 2011 BRiMS Annual Conference. These articles were reviewed by the editors, extended to journal article length, and then peer-reviewed and revised before being accepted. The articles include a new way to evaluate designs of interfaces for safety critical systems (Bolton in Comput. Math. Organ. Theory, 2012), an article that extends our understanding of how to model situation awareness (SA) in a cognitive architecture (Rodgers et al. in Comput. Math. Organ. Theory, 2012), an article that presents electroencephalography (EEG) data used to derive dynamic neurophysiologic models of engagement in teamwork (Stevens et al. in Comput. Math. Organ. Theory, 2012), and an article that demonstrates using machine learning to generate models and an example application of that tool (Best in Comput. Math. Organ. Theory, 2012). After presenting a brief summary of each paper we will see some recurrent themes of task analysis, team and individual models, spatial reasoning, usability issues, and particularly that they are models that interact with each other or systems.

AB - This special issue is similar to our previous special issues (Kennedy et al. in Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 16(3):217-219, 2010; 17(3):225-228, 2011) in that it includes articles based on the award winning conference papers of the, here, 2011 BRiMS Annual Conference. These articles were reviewed by the editors, extended to journal article length, and then peer-reviewed and revised before being accepted. The articles include a new way to evaluate designs of interfaces for safety critical systems (Bolton in Comput. Math. Organ. Theory, 2012), an article that extends our understanding of how to model situation awareness (SA) in a cognitive architecture (Rodgers et al. in Comput. Math. Organ. Theory, 2012), an article that presents electroencephalography (EEG) data used to derive dynamic neurophysiologic models of engagement in teamwork (Stevens et al. in Comput. Math. Organ. Theory, 2012), and an article that demonstrates using machine learning to generate models and an example application of that tool (Best in Comput. Math. Organ. Theory, 2012). After presenting a brief summary of each paper we will see some recurrent themes of task analysis, team and individual models, spatial reasoning, usability issues, and particularly that they are models that interact with each other or systems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881034353&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84881034353&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10588-012-9140-z

DO - 10.1007/s10588-012-9140-z

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84881034353

VL - 19

SP - 283

EP - 287

JO - Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory

JF - Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory

SN - 1381-298X

IS - 3

ER -