The carbon consequences of thinning techniques: Stand structure makes a difference

Coeli Hoover, Susan Stout

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

47 Scopus citations

Abstract

Using results from a 25-year study of thinning in a northwestern Pennsylvania Allegheny hardwood stand, we assess whether and how thinning method affected carbon sequestration and merchantable volume production. Plots were thinned to similar residual relative density by removing trees from different portions of the diameter distribution. Plots that were thinned from below had greater volume production and carbon sequestration rates than plots that were thinned from the middle or thinned from above. Control plots, which were not thinned, also had higher carbon sequestration rates than plots thinned from the middle and higher merchantable volume production and carbon sequestration rates than plots thinned from above. In this forest type, changing stand structure by thinning can affect carbon sequestration and stand growth either positively or negatively. Those effects can be significant, with long-term implications for the growth of the stand. In general, structures that favored volume production also favor carbon sequestration.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)266-270
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Forestry
Volume105
Issue number5
StatePublished - Jul 1 2007

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Forestry
  • Plant Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The carbon consequences of thinning techniques: Stand structure makes a difference'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this