The case for intervention bias in the practice of medicine

Andrew Foy, Edward J. Filippone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Bias is an inclination to present or hold a partial perspective at the expense of possibly equal or more valid alternatives. In this paper, we present a series of conditional arguments to prove that intervention bias exists in the practice of medicine. We then explore its potential causes, consequences, and criticisms. We use the term to describe the bias on the part of physicians and the medical community to intervene, whether it is with drugs, diagnostic tests, non-invasive procedures, or surgeries, when not intervening would be a reasonable alternative. The recognition of intervention bias in medicine is critically important given today's emphasis on providing high-value care and reducing unnecessary and potentially harmful interventions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)271-280
Number of pages10
JournalYale Journal of Biology and Medicine
Volume86
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jun 21 2013

Fingerprint

Medicine
Bioelectric potentials
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Surgery
Physicians
Pharmaceutical Preparations

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)

Cite this

@article{90492399fcc84170a02a2577800b7615,
title = "The case for intervention bias in the practice of medicine",
abstract = "Bias is an inclination to present or hold a partial perspective at the expense of possibly equal or more valid alternatives. In this paper, we present a series of conditional arguments to prove that intervention bias exists in the practice of medicine. We then explore its potential causes, consequences, and criticisms. We use the term to describe the bias on the part of physicians and the medical community to intervene, whether it is with drugs, diagnostic tests, non-invasive procedures, or surgeries, when not intervening would be a reasonable alternative. The recognition of intervention bias in medicine is critically important given today's emphasis on providing high-value care and reducing unnecessary and potentially harmful interventions.",
author = "Andrew Foy and Filippone, {Edward J.}",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
day = "21",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "86",
pages = "271--280",
journal = "Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine",
issn = "0044-0086",
publisher = "Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine Inc.",
number = "2",

}

The case for intervention bias in the practice of medicine. / Foy, Andrew; Filippone, Edward J.

In: Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, Vol. 86, No. 2, 21.06.2013, p. 271-280.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The case for intervention bias in the practice of medicine

AU - Foy, Andrew

AU - Filippone, Edward J.

PY - 2013/6/21

Y1 - 2013/6/21

N2 - Bias is an inclination to present or hold a partial perspective at the expense of possibly equal or more valid alternatives. In this paper, we present a series of conditional arguments to prove that intervention bias exists in the practice of medicine. We then explore its potential causes, consequences, and criticisms. We use the term to describe the bias on the part of physicians and the medical community to intervene, whether it is with drugs, diagnostic tests, non-invasive procedures, or surgeries, when not intervening would be a reasonable alternative. The recognition of intervention bias in medicine is critically important given today's emphasis on providing high-value care and reducing unnecessary and potentially harmful interventions.

AB - Bias is an inclination to present or hold a partial perspective at the expense of possibly equal or more valid alternatives. In this paper, we present a series of conditional arguments to prove that intervention bias exists in the practice of medicine. We then explore its potential causes, consequences, and criticisms. We use the term to describe the bias on the part of physicians and the medical community to intervene, whether it is with drugs, diagnostic tests, non-invasive procedures, or surgeries, when not intervening would be a reasonable alternative. The recognition of intervention bias in medicine is critically important given today's emphasis on providing high-value care and reducing unnecessary and potentially harmful interventions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879046980&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84879046980&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 23766747

AN - SCOPUS:84879046980

VL - 86

SP - 271

EP - 280

JO - Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine

JF - Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine

SN - 0044-0086

IS - 2

ER -