The case for trend‐stationarity is stronger than we thought

David N. Dejong, Charles H. Whiteman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In DeJong and Whiteman (1991a), we concluded that 11 of the 14 macroeconomic time‐series originally studied by Nelson and Plosser (1982) supported trend‐stationarity. Phillips (1991) criticizes this inference, claiming that our procedure is biased against integration, and that our results are sensitive to model and prior specification. However, Phillips' alternative models and priors bias his results in favour of integration; despite these biases, Phillips' own findings indicate that the data provide the greatest relative support to trend‐stationarity. This result is similar to our own (1989, 1990, 1991b) findings concerning the sensitivity of our results; the trend‐stationarity inference is remarkably robust.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)413-421
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Applied Econometrics
Volume6
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1991

Fingerprint

trend
macroeconomics
Trend stationarity
Inference
Macroeconomics
Alternative models

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

@article{dbb74572a0cb4e2293081c0b8e49fb3f,
title = "The case for trend‐stationarity is stronger than we thought",
abstract = "In DeJong and Whiteman (1991a), we concluded that 11 of the 14 macroeconomic time‐series originally studied by Nelson and Plosser (1982) supported trend‐stationarity. Phillips (1991) criticizes this inference, claiming that our procedure is biased against integration, and that our results are sensitive to model and prior specification. However, Phillips' alternative models and priors bias his results in favour of integration; despite these biases, Phillips' own findings indicate that the data provide the greatest relative support to trend‐stationarity. This result is similar to our own (1989, 1990, 1991b) findings concerning the sensitivity of our results; the trend‐stationarity inference is remarkably robust.",
author = "Dejong, {David N.} and Whiteman, {Charles H.}",
year = "1991",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/jae.3950060409",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "413--421",
journal = "Journal of Applied Econometrics",
issn = "0883-7252",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "4",

}

The case for trend‐stationarity is stronger than we thought. / Dejong, David N.; Whiteman, Charles H.

In: Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 6, No. 4, 01.01.1991, p. 413-421.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The case for trend‐stationarity is stronger than we thought

AU - Dejong, David N.

AU - Whiteman, Charles H.

PY - 1991/1/1

Y1 - 1991/1/1

N2 - In DeJong and Whiteman (1991a), we concluded that 11 of the 14 macroeconomic time‐series originally studied by Nelson and Plosser (1982) supported trend‐stationarity. Phillips (1991) criticizes this inference, claiming that our procedure is biased against integration, and that our results are sensitive to model and prior specification. However, Phillips' alternative models and priors bias his results in favour of integration; despite these biases, Phillips' own findings indicate that the data provide the greatest relative support to trend‐stationarity. This result is similar to our own (1989, 1990, 1991b) findings concerning the sensitivity of our results; the trend‐stationarity inference is remarkably robust.

AB - In DeJong and Whiteman (1991a), we concluded that 11 of the 14 macroeconomic time‐series originally studied by Nelson and Plosser (1982) supported trend‐stationarity. Phillips (1991) criticizes this inference, claiming that our procedure is biased against integration, and that our results are sensitive to model and prior specification. However, Phillips' alternative models and priors bias his results in favour of integration; despite these biases, Phillips' own findings indicate that the data provide the greatest relative support to trend‐stationarity. This result is similar to our own (1989, 1990, 1991b) findings concerning the sensitivity of our results; the trend‐stationarity inference is remarkably robust.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84986412977&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84986412977&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jae.3950060409

DO - 10.1002/jae.3950060409

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84986412977

VL - 6

SP - 413

EP - 421

JO - Journal of Applied Econometrics

JF - Journal of Applied Econometrics

SN - 0883-7252

IS - 4

ER -