The clinical usefulness of routine stacked multiplanar reconstruction in helical abdominal computed tomography

Kenneth D. Hopper, Stephen J. Huber, Claudia Kasales, Peter Mucha, Mukul Khandelwal, William A. Rowe, Thomas R. Tenhave, Scott W. Wise, Ann Ouyang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. The authors evaluate the usefulness of stacked multiplanar reconstructions in routine, thick-section abdominal computed tomography. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Twenty-five routine, thick section contrast abdominal CTs performed with equivalent technique were reformatted by multiplanar reconstructions in sagittal and coronal planes sequentially from side-to-side and front-to-back. The image sets were submitted, first axial images only followed by axial plus multiplanar reconstructions (MPRs), to 5 separate physician readers including 2 radiologists and 3 nonradiologists. These readers graded the visualization of a variety of normal and up to 5 pathologic lesions per patient on a scale of 1 to 5 (5 = best). RESULTS. The addition of sagittal and coronal multiplanar reconstructions significantly improved the visualization of all normal anatomic structures (mean axial only, 3.8; mean axial plus MPR, 4.1; P < 0.0001). In addition, most pathologic lesions were statistically better visualized with the addition of multiplanar reconstructions (mean axial images only, 3.9; mean axial plus MPR, 4.1; P < 0.0001). All five readers found improved visualization in nearly every category with the addition of the multiplanar reconstructions. However, in only 7% of cases, did a reviewer find new diagnostic information with the addition of MPR images. CONCLUSIONS. Stacked multiplanar reconstructions of routine, thick-section abdominal CT has clinical value in both the display of normal anatomic and pathologic lesions. Further studies, however, are required to confirm these findings before it is commonly used.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)550-556
Number of pages7
JournalInvestigative Radiology
Volume32
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 1997

Fingerprint

Computer-Assisted Image Processing
Spiral Computed Tomography
Tomography
Physicians
Radiologists

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Hopper, Kenneth D. ; Huber, Stephen J. ; Kasales, Claudia ; Mucha, Peter ; Khandelwal, Mukul ; Rowe, William A. ; Tenhave, Thomas R. ; Wise, Scott W. ; Ouyang, Ann. / The clinical usefulness of routine stacked multiplanar reconstruction in helical abdominal computed tomography. In: Investigative Radiology. 1997 ; Vol. 32, No. 9. pp. 550-556.
@article{93bab24950354c3ba3bfc7286ddf8792,
title = "The clinical usefulness of routine stacked multiplanar reconstruction in helical abdominal computed tomography",
abstract = "RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. The authors evaluate the usefulness of stacked multiplanar reconstructions in routine, thick-section abdominal computed tomography. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Twenty-five routine, thick section contrast abdominal CTs performed with equivalent technique were reformatted by multiplanar reconstructions in sagittal and coronal planes sequentially from side-to-side and front-to-back. The image sets were submitted, first axial images only followed by axial plus multiplanar reconstructions (MPRs), to 5 separate physician readers including 2 radiologists and 3 nonradiologists. These readers graded the visualization of a variety of normal and up to 5 pathologic lesions per patient on a scale of 1 to 5 (5 = best). RESULTS. The addition of sagittal and coronal multiplanar reconstructions significantly improved the visualization of all normal anatomic structures (mean axial only, 3.8; mean axial plus MPR, 4.1; P < 0.0001). In addition, most pathologic lesions were statistically better visualized with the addition of multiplanar reconstructions (mean axial images only, 3.9; mean axial plus MPR, 4.1; P < 0.0001). All five readers found improved visualization in nearly every category with the addition of the multiplanar reconstructions. However, in only 7{\%} of cases, did a reviewer find new diagnostic information with the addition of MPR images. CONCLUSIONS. Stacked multiplanar reconstructions of routine, thick-section abdominal CT has clinical value in both the display of normal anatomic and pathologic lesions. Further studies, however, are required to confirm these findings before it is commonly used.",
author = "Hopper, {Kenneth D.} and Huber, {Stephen J.} and Claudia Kasales and Peter Mucha and Mukul Khandelwal and Rowe, {William A.} and Tenhave, {Thomas R.} and Wise, {Scott W.} and Ann Ouyang",
year = "1997",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00004424-199709000-00007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "550--556",
journal = "Investigative Radiology",
issn = "0020-9996",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "9",

}

The clinical usefulness of routine stacked multiplanar reconstruction in helical abdominal computed tomography. / Hopper, Kenneth D.; Huber, Stephen J.; Kasales, Claudia; Mucha, Peter; Khandelwal, Mukul; Rowe, William A.; Tenhave, Thomas R.; Wise, Scott W.; Ouyang, Ann.

In: Investigative Radiology, Vol. 32, No. 9, 01.12.1997, p. 550-556.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The clinical usefulness of routine stacked multiplanar reconstruction in helical abdominal computed tomography

AU - Hopper, Kenneth D.

AU - Huber, Stephen J.

AU - Kasales, Claudia

AU - Mucha, Peter

AU - Khandelwal, Mukul

AU - Rowe, William A.

AU - Tenhave, Thomas R.

AU - Wise, Scott W.

AU - Ouyang, Ann

PY - 1997/12/1

Y1 - 1997/12/1

N2 - RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. The authors evaluate the usefulness of stacked multiplanar reconstructions in routine, thick-section abdominal computed tomography. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Twenty-five routine, thick section contrast abdominal CTs performed with equivalent technique were reformatted by multiplanar reconstructions in sagittal and coronal planes sequentially from side-to-side and front-to-back. The image sets were submitted, first axial images only followed by axial plus multiplanar reconstructions (MPRs), to 5 separate physician readers including 2 radiologists and 3 nonradiologists. These readers graded the visualization of a variety of normal and up to 5 pathologic lesions per patient on a scale of 1 to 5 (5 = best). RESULTS. The addition of sagittal and coronal multiplanar reconstructions significantly improved the visualization of all normal anatomic structures (mean axial only, 3.8; mean axial plus MPR, 4.1; P < 0.0001). In addition, most pathologic lesions were statistically better visualized with the addition of multiplanar reconstructions (mean axial images only, 3.9; mean axial plus MPR, 4.1; P < 0.0001). All five readers found improved visualization in nearly every category with the addition of the multiplanar reconstructions. However, in only 7% of cases, did a reviewer find new diagnostic information with the addition of MPR images. CONCLUSIONS. Stacked multiplanar reconstructions of routine, thick-section abdominal CT has clinical value in both the display of normal anatomic and pathologic lesions. Further studies, however, are required to confirm these findings before it is commonly used.

AB - RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. The authors evaluate the usefulness of stacked multiplanar reconstructions in routine, thick-section abdominal computed tomography. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Twenty-five routine, thick section contrast abdominal CTs performed with equivalent technique were reformatted by multiplanar reconstructions in sagittal and coronal planes sequentially from side-to-side and front-to-back. The image sets were submitted, first axial images only followed by axial plus multiplanar reconstructions (MPRs), to 5 separate physician readers including 2 radiologists and 3 nonradiologists. These readers graded the visualization of a variety of normal and up to 5 pathologic lesions per patient on a scale of 1 to 5 (5 = best). RESULTS. The addition of sagittal and coronal multiplanar reconstructions significantly improved the visualization of all normal anatomic structures (mean axial only, 3.8; mean axial plus MPR, 4.1; P < 0.0001). In addition, most pathologic lesions were statistically better visualized with the addition of multiplanar reconstructions (mean axial images only, 3.9; mean axial plus MPR, 4.1; P < 0.0001). All five readers found improved visualization in nearly every category with the addition of the multiplanar reconstructions. However, in only 7% of cases, did a reviewer find new diagnostic information with the addition of MPR images. CONCLUSIONS. Stacked multiplanar reconstructions of routine, thick-section abdominal CT has clinical value in both the display of normal anatomic and pathologic lesions. Further studies, however, are required to confirm these findings before it is commonly used.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031473039&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031473039&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00004424-199709000-00007

DO - 10.1097/00004424-199709000-00007

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 550

EP - 556

JO - Investigative Radiology

JF - Investigative Radiology

SN - 0020-9996

IS - 9

ER -