The Common Core’s promises and pitfalls from the perspectives of policy entrepreneurs and ground-level actors

Mindy L. Kornhaber, Nikolaus J. Barkauskas, Kelly M. Griffith, Erica Sausner, Julia Mahfouz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Common Core State Standards Initiative (Common Core) was spearheaded by policy entrepreneurs, unveiled nationally in 2010, and initially received strong support from leaders in state and federal government, philanthropic foundations, the business sector, and teacher unions. However, the reform came into the crosshairs of an ideologically wide set of politicians and interest groups. What is less well understood about the controversy are the responses the reform encountered within states, particularly from ground-level actors, such as parents, local educators, school boards, and community members, as well as their elected representatives. This study uses two data sets to examine how the promises and pitfalls that the reform’s policy entrepreneurs anticipated in 2011 were received by ground-level actors in 10 states between late-2013 and early-2014. The findings suggest ground-level responses to the anticipated promises and pitfalls both spurred and resonated with interest groups to disrupt the reform’s support among state-level leaders. The findings also suggest that political and implementation lessons may be gained from further study of the adoption and implementation of the Common Core in California. Whether the Common Core in California or other states may improve achievement or equity is considered in light of third-wave reforms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)385-412
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of Educational Change
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2017

Fingerprint

entrepreneur
reform
interest group
leader
reform policy
Federal Government
politician
parents
equity
educator
teacher
school
community

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education

Cite this

Kornhaber, Mindy L. ; Barkauskas, Nikolaus J. ; Griffith, Kelly M. ; Sausner, Erica ; Mahfouz, Julia. / The Common Core’s promises and pitfalls from the perspectives of policy entrepreneurs and ground-level actors. In: Journal of Educational Change. 2017 ; Vol. 18, No. 4. pp. 385-412.
@article{3cbb4fb679c3408dbde3ca5a01431d61,
title = "The Common Core’s promises and pitfalls from the perspectives of policy entrepreneurs and ground-level actors",
abstract = "The Common Core State Standards Initiative (Common Core) was spearheaded by policy entrepreneurs, unveiled nationally in 2010, and initially received strong support from leaders in state and federal government, philanthropic foundations, the business sector, and teacher unions. However, the reform came into the crosshairs of an ideologically wide set of politicians and interest groups. What is less well understood about the controversy are the responses the reform encountered within states, particularly from ground-level actors, such as parents, local educators, school boards, and community members, as well as their elected representatives. This study uses two data sets to examine how the promises and pitfalls that the reform’s policy entrepreneurs anticipated in 2011 were received by ground-level actors in 10 states between late-2013 and early-2014. The findings suggest ground-level responses to the anticipated promises and pitfalls both spurred and resonated with interest groups to disrupt the reform’s support among state-level leaders. The findings also suggest that political and implementation lessons may be gained from further study of the adoption and implementation of the Common Core in California. Whether the Common Core in California or other states may improve achievement or equity is considered in light of third-wave reforms.",
author = "Kornhaber, {Mindy L.} and Barkauskas, {Nikolaus J.} and Griffith, {Kelly M.} and Erica Sausner and Julia Mahfouz",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10833-017-9306-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "385--412",
journal = "Journal of Educational Change",
issn = "1389-2843",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

The Common Core’s promises and pitfalls from the perspectives of policy entrepreneurs and ground-level actors. / Kornhaber, Mindy L.; Barkauskas, Nikolaus J.; Griffith, Kelly M.; Sausner, Erica; Mahfouz, Julia.

In: Journal of Educational Change, Vol. 18, No. 4, 01.11.2017, p. 385-412.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Common Core’s promises and pitfalls from the perspectives of policy entrepreneurs and ground-level actors

AU - Kornhaber, Mindy L.

AU - Barkauskas, Nikolaus J.

AU - Griffith, Kelly M.

AU - Sausner, Erica

AU - Mahfouz, Julia

PY - 2017/11/1

Y1 - 2017/11/1

N2 - The Common Core State Standards Initiative (Common Core) was spearheaded by policy entrepreneurs, unveiled nationally in 2010, and initially received strong support from leaders in state and federal government, philanthropic foundations, the business sector, and teacher unions. However, the reform came into the crosshairs of an ideologically wide set of politicians and interest groups. What is less well understood about the controversy are the responses the reform encountered within states, particularly from ground-level actors, such as parents, local educators, school boards, and community members, as well as their elected representatives. This study uses two data sets to examine how the promises and pitfalls that the reform’s policy entrepreneurs anticipated in 2011 were received by ground-level actors in 10 states between late-2013 and early-2014. The findings suggest ground-level responses to the anticipated promises and pitfalls both spurred and resonated with interest groups to disrupt the reform’s support among state-level leaders. The findings also suggest that political and implementation lessons may be gained from further study of the adoption and implementation of the Common Core in California. Whether the Common Core in California or other states may improve achievement or equity is considered in light of third-wave reforms.

AB - The Common Core State Standards Initiative (Common Core) was spearheaded by policy entrepreneurs, unveiled nationally in 2010, and initially received strong support from leaders in state and federal government, philanthropic foundations, the business sector, and teacher unions. However, the reform came into the crosshairs of an ideologically wide set of politicians and interest groups. What is less well understood about the controversy are the responses the reform encountered within states, particularly from ground-level actors, such as parents, local educators, school boards, and community members, as well as their elected representatives. This study uses two data sets to examine how the promises and pitfalls that the reform’s policy entrepreneurs anticipated in 2011 were received by ground-level actors in 10 states between late-2013 and early-2014. The findings suggest ground-level responses to the anticipated promises and pitfalls both spurred and resonated with interest groups to disrupt the reform’s support among state-level leaders. The findings also suggest that political and implementation lessons may be gained from further study of the adoption and implementation of the Common Core in California. Whether the Common Core in California or other states may improve achievement or equity is considered in light of third-wave reforms.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029789395&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029789395&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10833-017-9306-z

DO - 10.1007/s10833-017-9306-z

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85029789395

VL - 18

SP - 385

EP - 412

JO - Journal of Educational Change

JF - Journal of Educational Change

SN - 1389-2843

IS - 4

ER -