The complementary effect of National Park fee increases on visitor spending in gateway communities

Jeremy Sage, Norma Nickerson, Zachary D. Miller, Alex Ocanas, Jennifer Thomsen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

In 2017, the US National Park Service faced a nearly $12 billion maintenance backlog. To address this backlog, they announced plans to increase entrance fees in 17 of the most visited parks. As fees are a component of the travel cost, we consider price change effects on demand for park entry. Demand for the 17 parks is shown to be inelastic. Recognizing that spending in gateway communities is complementary to national park visitation, we use Yellowstone National Park as a case study on entrance fee increase effects on gateway communities. We estimate a $3.4 million annual loss in gateway community spending by visitors as a result of reduced visitation by those visitors who choose not to purchase a 7-day pass. Acknowledging the diminishing effect of the fee increase on travel costs, we further explore alternative means of structuring fees based on examples of other countries.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)187-198
Number of pages12
JournalTourism Review International
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The complementary effect of National Park fee increases on visitor spending in gateway communities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this