The concept of aptitude and multidimensional validity revisited

Robert W. Roeser, Richard J. Shavelson, Haggai Kupermintz, Shun Lau, Carlos Ayala, Angela Haydel, Susan Schultz, Larry Gallagher, Gisell Quihuis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Richard E. Snow, reasoning from his new conception of aptitude, advocated a multidimensional approach to validating the construct of academic achievement. We briefly overview Snow's approach and then summarize evidence from this special issue in 3 themes: (a) the multidimensional structure of science achievement, (b) the incremental predictive validity provided when both cognitive and motivational (affective and conative) constructs are used to model individual differences in achievement, and (c) the co-contributions of ability, motivational orientations, and characteristics of achievement test situations to performance differences. Overall, our studies confirmed or established (a) a multidimensional structure of science achievement scores, (b) the validity of several key motivational constructs for predicting science achievement among high school students, (c) systematic variation in relations between motivational and general-ability constructs and science reasoning dimensions, assessment type, and achievement behavior (performance and anticipated choice), and (d) how alternative assessment methods (constructed response and performance assessment) shed light on the notion of multidimensional validity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)191-205
Number of pages15
JournalInternational Journal of Phytoremediation
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2002

Fingerprint

Snow
snow
high school students
academic achievement
Students
performance assessment
assessment method
student
science
testing
methodology

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Pollution
  • Plant Science

Cite this

Roeser, R. W., Shavelson, R. J., Kupermintz, H., Lau, S., Ayala, C., Haydel, A., ... Quihuis, G. (2002). The concept of aptitude and multidimensional validity revisited. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 21(1), 191-205. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326977EA0802_06
Roeser, Robert W. ; Shavelson, Richard J. ; Kupermintz, Haggai ; Lau, Shun ; Ayala, Carlos ; Haydel, Angela ; Schultz, Susan ; Gallagher, Larry ; Quihuis, Gisell. / The concept of aptitude and multidimensional validity revisited. In: International Journal of Phytoremediation. 2002 ; Vol. 21, No. 1. pp. 191-205.
@article{8e832d6002de4d75bb91fe806df1b220,
title = "The concept of aptitude and multidimensional validity revisited",
abstract = "Richard E. Snow, reasoning from his new conception of aptitude, advocated a multidimensional approach to validating the construct of academic achievement. We briefly overview Snow's approach and then summarize evidence from this special issue in 3 themes: (a) the multidimensional structure of science achievement, (b) the incremental predictive validity provided when both cognitive and motivational (affective and conative) constructs are used to model individual differences in achievement, and (c) the co-contributions of ability, motivational orientations, and characteristics of achievement test situations to performance differences. Overall, our studies confirmed or established (a) a multidimensional structure of science achievement scores, (b) the validity of several key motivational constructs for predicting science achievement among high school students, (c) systematic variation in relations between motivational and general-ability constructs and science reasoning dimensions, assessment type, and achievement behavior (performance and anticipated choice), and (d) how alternative assessment methods (constructed response and performance assessment) shed light on the notion of multidimensional validity.",
author = "Roeser, {Robert W.} and Shavelson, {Richard J.} and Haggai Kupermintz and Shun Lau and Carlos Ayala and Angela Haydel and Susan Schultz and Larry Gallagher and Gisell Quihuis",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1207/S15326977EA0802_06",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "191--205",
journal = "International Journal of Phytoremediation",
issn = "1522-6514",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Roeser, RW, Shavelson, RJ, Kupermintz, H, Lau, S, Ayala, C, Haydel, A, Schultz, S, Gallagher, L & Quihuis, G 2002, 'The concept of aptitude and multidimensional validity revisited', International Journal of Phytoremediation, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 191-205. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326977EA0802_06

The concept of aptitude and multidimensional validity revisited. / Roeser, Robert W.; Shavelson, Richard J.; Kupermintz, Haggai; Lau, Shun; Ayala, Carlos; Haydel, Angela; Schultz, Susan; Gallagher, Larry; Quihuis, Gisell.

In: International Journal of Phytoremediation, Vol. 21, No. 1, 01.01.2002, p. 191-205.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The concept of aptitude and multidimensional validity revisited

AU - Roeser, Robert W.

AU - Shavelson, Richard J.

AU - Kupermintz, Haggai

AU - Lau, Shun

AU - Ayala, Carlos

AU - Haydel, Angela

AU - Schultz, Susan

AU - Gallagher, Larry

AU - Quihuis, Gisell

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - Richard E. Snow, reasoning from his new conception of aptitude, advocated a multidimensional approach to validating the construct of academic achievement. We briefly overview Snow's approach and then summarize evidence from this special issue in 3 themes: (a) the multidimensional structure of science achievement, (b) the incremental predictive validity provided when both cognitive and motivational (affective and conative) constructs are used to model individual differences in achievement, and (c) the co-contributions of ability, motivational orientations, and characteristics of achievement test situations to performance differences. Overall, our studies confirmed or established (a) a multidimensional structure of science achievement scores, (b) the validity of several key motivational constructs for predicting science achievement among high school students, (c) systematic variation in relations between motivational and general-ability constructs and science reasoning dimensions, assessment type, and achievement behavior (performance and anticipated choice), and (d) how alternative assessment methods (constructed response and performance assessment) shed light on the notion of multidimensional validity.

AB - Richard E. Snow, reasoning from his new conception of aptitude, advocated a multidimensional approach to validating the construct of academic achievement. We briefly overview Snow's approach and then summarize evidence from this special issue in 3 themes: (a) the multidimensional structure of science achievement, (b) the incremental predictive validity provided when both cognitive and motivational (affective and conative) constructs are used to model individual differences in achievement, and (c) the co-contributions of ability, motivational orientations, and characteristics of achievement test situations to performance differences. Overall, our studies confirmed or established (a) a multidimensional structure of science achievement scores, (b) the validity of several key motivational constructs for predicting science achievement among high school students, (c) systematic variation in relations between motivational and general-ability constructs and science reasoning dimensions, assessment type, and achievement behavior (performance and anticipated choice), and (d) how alternative assessment methods (constructed response and performance assessment) shed light on the notion of multidimensional validity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066227662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066227662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1207/S15326977EA0802_06

DO - 10.1207/S15326977EA0802_06

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85066227662

VL - 21

SP - 191

EP - 205

JO - International Journal of Phytoremediation

JF - International Journal of Phytoremediation

SN - 1522-6514

IS - 1

ER -