The conversational partner's perspective affects spatial memory and descriptions

Alexia Galati, Christina Michael, Catherine Mello, Nathan Michael Greenauer, Marios N. Avraamides

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We examined whether people spontaneously represent the partner's viewpoint in spatial memory when it is available in advance and whether they adapt their spontaneous descriptions accordingly. In 18 pairs, Directors studied arrays of objects while: (1) not knowing about having to describe the array to a Matcher, (2) knowing about the subsequent description, and (3) knowing the Matcher's subsequent viewpoint, which was offset by 90°, 135°, or 180°. In memory tests preceding descriptions, Directors represented the Matcher's viewpoint when it was known during study, taking longer to imagine orienting to perspectives aligned with it and rotating their drawings of arrays toward it. Conversely, when Directors didn't know their Matcher's viewpoint, they encoded arrays egocentrically, being faster to imagine orienting to and to respond from perspectives aligned with their own. Directors adapted their descriptions flexibly, using partner-centered spatial expressions more frequently when misaligned by 90° and egocentric ones when misaligned by 135°. Knowing their misalignment in advance helped partners recognize when descriptions would be most difficult for Directors (at 135°) and to mutually agree on using their perspective. Thus, in collaborative tasks, people don't rely exclusively on their spatial memory but also use other pertinent perceptual information (e.g., their misalignment from their partner) to assess the computational demands on each partner and select strategies that maximize the efficiency of communication.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)140-159
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Memory and Language
Volume68
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2013

Fingerprint

director
Data storage equipment
Communication
Efficiency
Spatial Memory
efficiency
communication
Computational

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Artificial Intelligence

Cite this

Galati, Alexia ; Michael, Christina ; Mello, Catherine ; Greenauer, Nathan Michael ; Avraamides, Marios N. / The conversational partner's perspective affects spatial memory and descriptions. In: Journal of Memory and Language. 2013 ; Vol. 68, No. 2. pp. 140-159.
@article{f83347cac4ad44cd9d9dacdc180660f8,
title = "The conversational partner's perspective affects spatial memory and descriptions",
abstract = "We examined whether people spontaneously represent the partner's viewpoint in spatial memory when it is available in advance and whether they adapt their spontaneous descriptions accordingly. In 18 pairs, Directors studied arrays of objects while: (1) not knowing about having to describe the array to a Matcher, (2) knowing about the subsequent description, and (3) knowing the Matcher's subsequent viewpoint, which was offset by 90°, 135°, or 180°. In memory tests preceding descriptions, Directors represented the Matcher's viewpoint when it was known during study, taking longer to imagine orienting to perspectives aligned with it and rotating their drawings of arrays toward it. Conversely, when Directors didn't know their Matcher's viewpoint, they encoded arrays egocentrically, being faster to imagine orienting to and to respond from perspectives aligned with their own. Directors adapted their descriptions flexibly, using partner-centered spatial expressions more frequently when misaligned by 90° and egocentric ones when misaligned by 135°. Knowing their misalignment in advance helped partners recognize when descriptions would be most difficult for Directors (at 135°) and to mutually agree on using their perspective. Thus, in collaborative tasks, people don't rely exclusively on their spatial memory but also use other pertinent perceptual information (e.g., their misalignment from their partner) to assess the computational demands on each partner and select strategies that maximize the efficiency of communication.",
author = "Alexia Galati and Christina Michael and Catherine Mello and Greenauer, {Nathan Michael} and Avraamides, {Marios N.}",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jml.2012.10.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "68",
pages = "140--159",
journal = "Journal of Memory and Language",
issn = "0749-596X",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

The conversational partner's perspective affects spatial memory and descriptions. / Galati, Alexia; Michael, Christina; Mello, Catherine; Greenauer, Nathan Michael; Avraamides, Marios N.

In: Journal of Memory and Language, Vol. 68, No. 2, 01.02.2013, p. 140-159.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The conversational partner's perspective affects spatial memory and descriptions

AU - Galati, Alexia

AU - Michael, Christina

AU - Mello, Catherine

AU - Greenauer, Nathan Michael

AU - Avraamides, Marios N.

PY - 2013/2/1

Y1 - 2013/2/1

N2 - We examined whether people spontaneously represent the partner's viewpoint in spatial memory when it is available in advance and whether they adapt their spontaneous descriptions accordingly. In 18 pairs, Directors studied arrays of objects while: (1) not knowing about having to describe the array to a Matcher, (2) knowing about the subsequent description, and (3) knowing the Matcher's subsequent viewpoint, which was offset by 90°, 135°, or 180°. In memory tests preceding descriptions, Directors represented the Matcher's viewpoint when it was known during study, taking longer to imagine orienting to perspectives aligned with it and rotating their drawings of arrays toward it. Conversely, when Directors didn't know their Matcher's viewpoint, they encoded arrays egocentrically, being faster to imagine orienting to and to respond from perspectives aligned with their own. Directors adapted their descriptions flexibly, using partner-centered spatial expressions more frequently when misaligned by 90° and egocentric ones when misaligned by 135°. Knowing their misalignment in advance helped partners recognize when descriptions would be most difficult for Directors (at 135°) and to mutually agree on using their perspective. Thus, in collaborative tasks, people don't rely exclusively on their spatial memory but also use other pertinent perceptual information (e.g., their misalignment from their partner) to assess the computational demands on each partner and select strategies that maximize the efficiency of communication.

AB - We examined whether people spontaneously represent the partner's viewpoint in spatial memory when it is available in advance and whether they adapt their spontaneous descriptions accordingly. In 18 pairs, Directors studied arrays of objects while: (1) not knowing about having to describe the array to a Matcher, (2) knowing about the subsequent description, and (3) knowing the Matcher's subsequent viewpoint, which was offset by 90°, 135°, or 180°. In memory tests preceding descriptions, Directors represented the Matcher's viewpoint when it was known during study, taking longer to imagine orienting to perspectives aligned with it and rotating their drawings of arrays toward it. Conversely, when Directors didn't know their Matcher's viewpoint, they encoded arrays egocentrically, being faster to imagine orienting to and to respond from perspectives aligned with their own. Directors adapted their descriptions flexibly, using partner-centered spatial expressions more frequently when misaligned by 90° and egocentric ones when misaligned by 135°. Knowing their misalignment in advance helped partners recognize when descriptions would be most difficult for Directors (at 135°) and to mutually agree on using their perspective. Thus, in collaborative tasks, people don't rely exclusively on their spatial memory but also use other pertinent perceptual information (e.g., their misalignment from their partner) to assess the computational demands on each partner and select strategies that maximize the efficiency of communication.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871936751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871936751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jml.2012.10.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jml.2012.10.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84871936751

VL - 68

SP - 140

EP - 159

JO - Journal of Memory and Language

JF - Journal of Memory and Language

SN - 0749-596X

IS - 2

ER -