The double role of ontologies in information science research

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

66 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In philosophy, Ontology is the basic description of things in the world. In information science, an ontol ogy refers to an engineering artifact, constituted by a specific vocabulary used to describe a certain reality. Ontologies have been proposed for validating both conceptual models and conceptual schemas; however, these roles are quite dissimilar. In this article, we show that ontologies can be better understood if we classify the different uses of the term as it appears in the literature. First, we explain Ontology (upper case O) as used in Philosophy. Then, we propose a differentiation between ontologies of information systems and ontologies for information systems. All three concepts have an important role in information science. We clarify the different meanings and uses of Ontology and ontologies through a comparison of research by Wand and Weber and by Guarino in ontology-driven information systems. The contributions of this article are twofold: (a) It provides a better understanding of what ontologies are, and (b) it explains the double role of ontologies in information science research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)786-793
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Volume58
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2007

Fingerprint

Information science
information science
ontology
Ontology
information system
Information systems
vocabulary
artifact
engineering

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Software
  • Information Systems
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Artificial Intelligence

Cite this

@article{362db34560584adb9c1628e717ccd270,
title = "The double role of ontologies in information science research",
abstract = "In philosophy, Ontology is the basic description of things in the world. In information science, an ontol ogy refers to an engineering artifact, constituted by a specific vocabulary used to describe a certain reality. Ontologies have been proposed for validating both conceptual models and conceptual schemas; however, these roles are quite dissimilar. In this article, we show that ontologies can be better understood if we classify the different uses of the term as it appears in the literature. First, we explain Ontology (upper case O) as used in Philosophy. Then, we propose a differentiation between ontologies of information systems and ontologies for information systems. All three concepts have an important role in information science. We clarify the different meanings and uses of Ontology and ontologies through a comparison of research by Wand and Weber and by Guarino in ontology-driven information systems. The contributions of this article are twofold: (a) It provides a better understanding of what ontologies are, and (b) it explains the double role of ontologies in information science research.",
author = "Frederico Fonseca",
year = "2007",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/asi.20565",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "786--793",
journal = "Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology",
issn = "2330-1635",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "6",

}

The double role of ontologies in information science research. / Fonseca, Frederico.

In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 58, No. 6, 01.04.2007, p. 786-793.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The double role of ontologies in information science research

AU - Fonseca, Frederico

PY - 2007/4/1

Y1 - 2007/4/1

N2 - In philosophy, Ontology is the basic description of things in the world. In information science, an ontol ogy refers to an engineering artifact, constituted by a specific vocabulary used to describe a certain reality. Ontologies have been proposed for validating both conceptual models and conceptual schemas; however, these roles are quite dissimilar. In this article, we show that ontologies can be better understood if we classify the different uses of the term as it appears in the literature. First, we explain Ontology (upper case O) as used in Philosophy. Then, we propose a differentiation between ontologies of information systems and ontologies for information systems. All three concepts have an important role in information science. We clarify the different meanings and uses of Ontology and ontologies through a comparison of research by Wand and Weber and by Guarino in ontology-driven information systems. The contributions of this article are twofold: (a) It provides a better understanding of what ontologies are, and (b) it explains the double role of ontologies in information science research.

AB - In philosophy, Ontology is the basic description of things in the world. In information science, an ontol ogy refers to an engineering artifact, constituted by a specific vocabulary used to describe a certain reality. Ontologies have been proposed for validating both conceptual models and conceptual schemas; however, these roles are quite dissimilar. In this article, we show that ontologies can be better understood if we classify the different uses of the term as it appears in the literature. First, we explain Ontology (upper case O) as used in Philosophy. Then, we propose a differentiation between ontologies of information systems and ontologies for information systems. All three concepts have an important role in information science. We clarify the different meanings and uses of Ontology and ontologies through a comparison of research by Wand and Weber and by Guarino in ontology-driven information systems. The contributions of this article are twofold: (a) It provides a better understanding of what ontologies are, and (b) it explains the double role of ontologies in information science research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247113779&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34247113779&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/asi.20565

DO - 10.1002/asi.20565

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 786

EP - 793

JO - Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

JF - Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

SN - 2330-1635

IS - 6

ER -