The dynamic structure of congressional elections

Suzanna Linn, James A. Stimson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We address three questions. First we ask to what degree elections to the U.S. House of Representatives may be understood to reflect the influence of current public opinion? This requires us to entertain models of House elections with incumbency effects as a dynamic system. We ask, second, how do the effects of exogenous influences of all sorts work their way into ultimate House composition? Third, we ask if some portion of the effects attributed to incumbency might not be simply these dynamics, reasserted effects of previous elections, in addition to the well-known advantages individual incumbents accrue? We estimate pooled models of state-level aggregate voting for the House. We add Policy Mood to the usual set of explanations as a means to specify the central focus of democratic theories of elections. We focus on how incumbency translates contemporaneous effects of the explanatory variables into dynamic effects and on how this translation differentially affects the various inputs to the system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)630-648
Number of pages19
JournalThe Journal of Politics
Volume57
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 1995

Fingerprint

election
mood
public opinion
voting

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Linn, Suzanna ; Stimson, James A. / The dynamic structure of congressional elections. In: The Journal of Politics. 1995 ; Vol. 57, No. 3. pp. 630-648.
@article{8227d29404c04e03a886ae65e48bb673,
title = "The dynamic structure of congressional elections",
abstract = "We address three questions. First we ask to what degree elections to the U.S. House of Representatives may be understood to reflect the influence of current public opinion? This requires us to entertain models of House elections with incumbency effects as a dynamic system. We ask, second, how do the effects of exogenous influences of all sorts work their way into ultimate House composition? Third, we ask if some portion of the effects attributed to incumbency might not be simply these dynamics, reasserted effects of previous elections, in addition to the well-known advantages individual incumbents accrue? We estimate pooled models of state-level aggregate voting for the House. We add Policy Mood to the usual set of explanations as a means to specify the central focus of democratic theories of elections. We focus on how incumbency translates contemporaneous effects of the explanatory variables into dynamic effects and on how this translation differentially affects the various inputs to the system.",
author = "Suzanna Linn and Stimson, {James A.}",
year = "1995",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2307/2960186",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "57",
pages = "630--648",
journal = "Journal of Politics",
issn = "0022-3816",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

The dynamic structure of congressional elections. / Linn, Suzanna; Stimson, James A.

In: The Journal of Politics, Vol. 57, No. 3, 01.08.1995, p. 630-648.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The dynamic structure of congressional elections

AU - Linn, Suzanna

AU - Stimson, James A.

PY - 1995/8/1

Y1 - 1995/8/1

N2 - We address three questions. First we ask to what degree elections to the U.S. House of Representatives may be understood to reflect the influence of current public opinion? This requires us to entertain models of House elections with incumbency effects as a dynamic system. We ask, second, how do the effects of exogenous influences of all sorts work their way into ultimate House composition? Third, we ask if some portion of the effects attributed to incumbency might not be simply these dynamics, reasserted effects of previous elections, in addition to the well-known advantages individual incumbents accrue? We estimate pooled models of state-level aggregate voting for the House. We add Policy Mood to the usual set of explanations as a means to specify the central focus of democratic theories of elections. We focus on how incumbency translates contemporaneous effects of the explanatory variables into dynamic effects and on how this translation differentially affects the various inputs to the system.

AB - We address three questions. First we ask to what degree elections to the U.S. House of Representatives may be understood to reflect the influence of current public opinion? This requires us to entertain models of House elections with incumbency effects as a dynamic system. We ask, second, how do the effects of exogenous influences of all sorts work their way into ultimate House composition? Third, we ask if some portion of the effects attributed to incumbency might not be simply these dynamics, reasserted effects of previous elections, in addition to the well-known advantages individual incumbents accrue? We estimate pooled models of state-level aggregate voting for the House. We add Policy Mood to the usual set of explanations as a means to specify the central focus of democratic theories of elections. We focus on how incumbency translates contemporaneous effects of the explanatory variables into dynamic effects and on how this translation differentially affects the various inputs to the system.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84974265589&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84974265589&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2307/2960186

DO - 10.2307/2960186

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 630

EP - 648

JO - Journal of Politics

JF - Journal of Politics

SN - 0022-3816

IS - 3

ER -