The effect of competition on the efficient-responsive choice

Tong Wang, Douglas J. Thomas, Nils Rudi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In determining their operations strategy, a firm chooses whether to be responsive or efficient. For firms competing in a market with uncertain demand and varying intensity of substitutability for the competitor's product, we characterize the responsive or efficient choice in equilibrium. To focus first on the competitive implications, we study a model where a firm can choose to be responsive at no additional fixed or marginal cost. We find that competing firms will choose the same configuration (responsive or efficient), and responsiveness tends to be favorable when demand uncertainty is high or when product competition is not too strong. Intense competition can drive firms to choose to be efficient rather than responsive even when there is no additional cost of being responsive. In such a case, both firms would be better off by choosing to be responsive but cannot credibly commit. We extend the basic model to study the impact of endogenized production timing, multiple productions and product holdback (or, equivalently, postponed production). For all these settings, we find structurally similar results; firms choose the same configuration, and the firms may miss Pareto-improvements. Furthermore, through extensions to the basic model, we find that greater operational flexibility can make responsiveness look less attractive in the presence of product competition. In contrast to our basic model and other extensions, we find it is possible for one firm to be responsive while the other is efficient when there is either a fixed cost or variable cost premium associated with responsive delivery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)829-846
Number of pages18
JournalProduction and Operations Management
Volume23
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Costs
Uncertainty
Fixed costs
Responsiveness

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

Wang, Tong ; Thomas, Douglas J. ; Rudi, Nils. / The effect of competition on the efficient-responsive choice. In: Production and Operations Management. 2014 ; Vol. 23, No. 5. pp. 829-846.
@article{72a50ce29ead4de48091e8efd57e1b64,
title = "The effect of competition on the efficient-responsive choice",
abstract = "In determining their operations strategy, a firm chooses whether to be responsive or efficient. For firms competing in a market with uncertain demand and varying intensity of substitutability for the competitor's product, we characterize the responsive or efficient choice in equilibrium. To focus first on the competitive implications, we study a model where a firm can choose to be responsive at no additional fixed or marginal cost. We find that competing firms will choose the same configuration (responsive or efficient), and responsiveness tends to be favorable when demand uncertainty is high or when product competition is not too strong. Intense competition can drive firms to choose to be efficient rather than responsive even when there is no additional cost of being responsive. In such a case, both firms would be better off by choosing to be responsive but cannot credibly commit. We extend the basic model to study the impact of endogenized production timing, multiple productions and product holdback (or, equivalently, postponed production). For all these settings, we find structurally similar results; firms choose the same configuration, and the firms may miss Pareto-improvements. Furthermore, through extensions to the basic model, we find that greater operational flexibility can make responsiveness look less attractive in the presence of product competition. In contrast to our basic model and other extensions, we find it is possible for one firm to be responsive while the other is efficient when there is either a fixed cost or variable cost premium associated with responsive delivery.",
author = "Tong Wang and Thomas, {Douglas J.} and Nils Rudi",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/poms.12093",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "829--846",
journal = "Production and Operations Management",
issn = "1059-1478",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

The effect of competition on the efficient-responsive choice. / Wang, Tong; Thomas, Douglas J.; Rudi, Nils.

In: Production and Operations Management, Vol. 23, No. 5, 01.01.2014, p. 829-846.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of competition on the efficient-responsive choice

AU - Wang, Tong

AU - Thomas, Douglas J.

AU - Rudi, Nils

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - In determining their operations strategy, a firm chooses whether to be responsive or efficient. For firms competing in a market with uncertain demand and varying intensity of substitutability for the competitor's product, we characterize the responsive or efficient choice in equilibrium. To focus first on the competitive implications, we study a model where a firm can choose to be responsive at no additional fixed or marginal cost. We find that competing firms will choose the same configuration (responsive or efficient), and responsiveness tends to be favorable when demand uncertainty is high or when product competition is not too strong. Intense competition can drive firms to choose to be efficient rather than responsive even when there is no additional cost of being responsive. In such a case, both firms would be better off by choosing to be responsive but cannot credibly commit. We extend the basic model to study the impact of endogenized production timing, multiple productions and product holdback (or, equivalently, postponed production). For all these settings, we find structurally similar results; firms choose the same configuration, and the firms may miss Pareto-improvements. Furthermore, through extensions to the basic model, we find that greater operational flexibility can make responsiveness look less attractive in the presence of product competition. In contrast to our basic model and other extensions, we find it is possible for one firm to be responsive while the other is efficient when there is either a fixed cost or variable cost premium associated with responsive delivery.

AB - In determining their operations strategy, a firm chooses whether to be responsive or efficient. For firms competing in a market with uncertain demand and varying intensity of substitutability for the competitor's product, we characterize the responsive or efficient choice in equilibrium. To focus first on the competitive implications, we study a model where a firm can choose to be responsive at no additional fixed or marginal cost. We find that competing firms will choose the same configuration (responsive or efficient), and responsiveness tends to be favorable when demand uncertainty is high or when product competition is not too strong. Intense competition can drive firms to choose to be efficient rather than responsive even when there is no additional cost of being responsive. In such a case, both firms would be better off by choosing to be responsive but cannot credibly commit. We extend the basic model to study the impact of endogenized production timing, multiple productions and product holdback (or, equivalently, postponed production). For all these settings, we find structurally similar results; firms choose the same configuration, and the firms may miss Pareto-improvements. Furthermore, through extensions to the basic model, we find that greater operational flexibility can make responsiveness look less attractive in the presence of product competition. In contrast to our basic model and other extensions, we find it is possible for one firm to be responsive while the other is efficient when there is either a fixed cost or variable cost premium associated with responsive delivery.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84900482592&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84900482592&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/poms.12093

DO - 10.1111/poms.12093

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 829

EP - 846

JO - Production and Operations Management

JF - Production and Operations Management

SN - 1059-1478

IS - 5

ER -