The effect of repeated attempts and test-retest reliability in children’s singing accuracy

Bryan Nichols, Sijia Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of repeated attempts at singing accuracy tasks. Test-retest reliability of singing accuracy was examined in a second administration of the test. A secondary purpose was to analyze individual variability in children’s singing accuracy. Test stimuli were designed using five attempts each at a single pitch, interval, and four-note pattern, and song singing. Children aged 6–11 were given the one-on-one singing accuracy test, and an identical form of the test was administered again within 1–6 weeks. Pitch matching items were scored by measuring the deviation in Hertz from the stimuli. The song singing item was scored by singing teachers using an 8-point scale with acceptable inter-rater reliability (r =.86). Participants’ individual best attempt out of five was equally distributed, with overall performance increasing across subsequent attempts measured in signed cent deviation. A repeated-measures ANOVA with the task type (single, interval, and pattern) and attempt (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) as the within-subjects variables indicated no main effect for task type (p =.129), but a significant main effect for attempt (p <.001, (Formula presented.) =.087). Test-retest reliability was considered high (r =.69).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)551-562
Number of pages12
JournalMusicae Scientiae
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

Fingerprint

Singing
Reproducibility of Results
Music
Test-retest Reliability
Analysis of Variance

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Music

Cite this

@article{3ebed8050d914d90af7c4e1115a4541b,
title = "The effect of repeated attempts and test-retest reliability in children’s singing accuracy",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of repeated attempts at singing accuracy tasks. Test-retest reliability of singing accuracy was examined in a second administration of the test. A secondary purpose was to analyze individual variability in children’s singing accuracy. Test stimuli were designed using five attempts each at a single pitch, interval, and four-note pattern, and song singing. Children aged 6–11 were given the one-on-one singing accuracy test, and an identical form of the test was administered again within 1–6 weeks. Pitch matching items were scored by measuring the deviation in Hertz from the stimuli. The song singing item was scored by singing teachers using an 8-point scale with acceptable inter-rater reliability (r =.86). Participants’ individual best attempt out of five was equally distributed, with overall performance increasing across subsequent attempts measured in signed cent deviation. A repeated-measures ANOVA with the task type (single, interval, and pattern) and attempt (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) as the within-subjects variables indicated no main effect for task type (p =.129), but a significant main effect for attempt (p <.001, (Formula presented.) =.087). Test-retest reliability was considered high (r =.69).",
author = "Bryan Nichols and Sijia Wang",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1029864916638914",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "551--562",
journal = "Musicae Scientiae",
issn = "1029-8649",
publisher = "European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music",
number = "4",

}

The effect of repeated attempts and test-retest reliability in children’s singing accuracy. / Nichols, Bryan; Wang, Sijia.

In: Musicae Scientiae, Vol. 20, No. 4, 01.12.2016, p. 551-562.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of repeated attempts and test-retest reliability in children’s singing accuracy

AU - Nichols, Bryan

AU - Wang, Sijia

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of repeated attempts at singing accuracy tasks. Test-retest reliability of singing accuracy was examined in a second administration of the test. A secondary purpose was to analyze individual variability in children’s singing accuracy. Test stimuli were designed using five attempts each at a single pitch, interval, and four-note pattern, and song singing. Children aged 6–11 were given the one-on-one singing accuracy test, and an identical form of the test was administered again within 1–6 weeks. Pitch matching items were scored by measuring the deviation in Hertz from the stimuli. The song singing item was scored by singing teachers using an 8-point scale with acceptable inter-rater reliability (r =.86). Participants’ individual best attempt out of five was equally distributed, with overall performance increasing across subsequent attempts measured in signed cent deviation. A repeated-measures ANOVA with the task type (single, interval, and pattern) and attempt (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) as the within-subjects variables indicated no main effect for task type (p =.129), but a significant main effect for attempt (p <.001, (Formula presented.) =.087). Test-retest reliability was considered high (r =.69).

AB - The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of repeated attempts at singing accuracy tasks. Test-retest reliability of singing accuracy was examined in a second administration of the test. A secondary purpose was to analyze individual variability in children’s singing accuracy. Test stimuli were designed using five attempts each at a single pitch, interval, and four-note pattern, and song singing. Children aged 6–11 were given the one-on-one singing accuracy test, and an identical form of the test was administered again within 1–6 weeks. Pitch matching items were scored by measuring the deviation in Hertz from the stimuli. The song singing item was scored by singing teachers using an 8-point scale with acceptable inter-rater reliability (r =.86). Participants’ individual best attempt out of five was equally distributed, with overall performance increasing across subsequent attempts measured in signed cent deviation. A repeated-measures ANOVA with the task type (single, interval, and pattern) and attempt (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) as the within-subjects variables indicated no main effect for task type (p =.129), but a significant main effect for attempt (p <.001, (Formula presented.) =.087). Test-retest reliability was considered high (r =.69).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992597875&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992597875&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1029864916638914

DO - 10.1177/1029864916638914

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84992597875

VL - 20

SP - 551

EP - 562

JO - Musicae Scientiae

JF - Musicae Scientiae

SN - 1029-8649

IS - 4

ER -