The effects of age on stabilization of the mediolateral trajectory of the swing foot

Vennila Krishnan, Noah J. Rosenblatt, Mark Latash, Mark D. Grabiner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To ensure stability during gait, mediolateral placement of the swinging foot must be actively regulated. Logically this occurs through end-point control of the swing limb trajectory, the precision of which is quantified as step-width variability (SWV). Increased SWV with age may reflect reduced precision of this control, but cannot describe if, and how, age-related changes in lower limb kinematic synergies account for reduced precision. We analyzed joint configuration variance across steps within the uncontrolled manifold (UCM) hypothesis, which assumes that redundant sets of elemental variables are organized by the central nervous system to stabilize important performance variables. We tested whether: (1) regardless of age, the swing limb trajectory would be stabilized by a kinematic synergy of the lower limbs, and (2) the strength of the synergy would be weaker in older adults. Ten younger and ten older adults (65+ years) walked on a laboratory walkway at their preferred speed while kinematic data were collected. UCM analysis of segmental configuration variance was performed with respect to the mediolateral trajectory of the swing-limb ankle joint center. Throughout most of swing, the trajectory was stabilized by a kinematic synergy. Despite the greater segmental configuration variance of older adults, the strength of the synergy was not significantly different between groups. Moreover, the synergy index became negative during terminal swing and was not significantly correlated with SWV. Accordingly, co-variation among individual segmental trajectories is more important for stabilization of the swing trajectory during mid-swing, and, throughout swing, aging does not appear to affect this stabilization.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)923-928
Number of pages6
JournalGait and Posture
Volume38
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2013

Fingerprint

Biomechanical Phenomena
Foot
Extremities
Lower Extremity
Ankle Joint
Gait
Central Nervous System
Joints

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Rehabilitation
  • Biophysics

Cite this

Krishnan, Vennila ; Rosenblatt, Noah J. ; Latash, Mark ; Grabiner, Mark D. / The effects of age on stabilization of the mediolateral trajectory of the swing foot. In: Gait and Posture. 2013 ; Vol. 38, No. 4. pp. 923-928.
@article{e7d08806bdfc486b9a6c6c184d4efa26,
title = "The effects of age on stabilization of the mediolateral trajectory of the swing foot",
abstract = "To ensure stability during gait, mediolateral placement of the swinging foot must be actively regulated. Logically this occurs through end-point control of the swing limb trajectory, the precision of which is quantified as step-width variability (SWV). Increased SWV with age may reflect reduced precision of this control, but cannot describe if, and how, age-related changes in lower limb kinematic synergies account for reduced precision. We analyzed joint configuration variance across steps within the uncontrolled manifold (UCM) hypothesis, which assumes that redundant sets of elemental variables are organized by the central nervous system to stabilize important performance variables. We tested whether: (1) regardless of age, the swing limb trajectory would be stabilized by a kinematic synergy of the lower limbs, and (2) the strength of the synergy would be weaker in older adults. Ten younger and ten older adults (65+ years) walked on a laboratory walkway at their preferred speed while kinematic data were collected. UCM analysis of segmental configuration variance was performed with respect to the mediolateral trajectory of the swing-limb ankle joint center. Throughout most of swing, the trajectory was stabilized by a kinematic synergy. Despite the greater segmental configuration variance of older adults, the strength of the synergy was not significantly different between groups. Moreover, the synergy index became negative during terminal swing and was not significantly correlated with SWV. Accordingly, co-variation among individual segmental trajectories is more important for stabilization of the swing trajectory during mid-swing, and, throughout swing, aging does not appear to affect this stabilization.",
author = "Vennila Krishnan and Rosenblatt, {Noah J.} and Mark Latash and Grabiner, {Mark D.}",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.04.023",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "923--928",
journal = "Gait and Posture",
issn = "0966-6362",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4",

}

The effects of age on stabilization of the mediolateral trajectory of the swing foot. / Krishnan, Vennila; Rosenblatt, Noah J.; Latash, Mark; Grabiner, Mark D.

In: Gait and Posture, Vol. 38, No. 4, 01.09.2013, p. 923-928.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of age on stabilization of the mediolateral trajectory of the swing foot

AU - Krishnan, Vennila

AU - Rosenblatt, Noah J.

AU - Latash, Mark

AU - Grabiner, Mark D.

PY - 2013/9/1

Y1 - 2013/9/1

N2 - To ensure stability during gait, mediolateral placement of the swinging foot must be actively regulated. Logically this occurs through end-point control of the swing limb trajectory, the precision of which is quantified as step-width variability (SWV). Increased SWV with age may reflect reduced precision of this control, but cannot describe if, and how, age-related changes in lower limb kinematic synergies account for reduced precision. We analyzed joint configuration variance across steps within the uncontrolled manifold (UCM) hypothesis, which assumes that redundant sets of elemental variables are organized by the central nervous system to stabilize important performance variables. We tested whether: (1) regardless of age, the swing limb trajectory would be stabilized by a kinematic synergy of the lower limbs, and (2) the strength of the synergy would be weaker in older adults. Ten younger and ten older adults (65+ years) walked on a laboratory walkway at their preferred speed while kinematic data were collected. UCM analysis of segmental configuration variance was performed with respect to the mediolateral trajectory of the swing-limb ankle joint center. Throughout most of swing, the trajectory was stabilized by a kinematic synergy. Despite the greater segmental configuration variance of older adults, the strength of the synergy was not significantly different between groups. Moreover, the synergy index became negative during terminal swing and was not significantly correlated with SWV. Accordingly, co-variation among individual segmental trajectories is more important for stabilization of the swing trajectory during mid-swing, and, throughout swing, aging does not appear to affect this stabilization.

AB - To ensure stability during gait, mediolateral placement of the swinging foot must be actively regulated. Logically this occurs through end-point control of the swing limb trajectory, the precision of which is quantified as step-width variability (SWV). Increased SWV with age may reflect reduced precision of this control, but cannot describe if, and how, age-related changes in lower limb kinematic synergies account for reduced precision. We analyzed joint configuration variance across steps within the uncontrolled manifold (UCM) hypothesis, which assumes that redundant sets of elemental variables are organized by the central nervous system to stabilize important performance variables. We tested whether: (1) regardless of age, the swing limb trajectory would be stabilized by a kinematic synergy of the lower limbs, and (2) the strength of the synergy would be weaker in older adults. Ten younger and ten older adults (65+ years) walked on a laboratory walkway at their preferred speed while kinematic data were collected. UCM analysis of segmental configuration variance was performed with respect to the mediolateral trajectory of the swing-limb ankle joint center. Throughout most of swing, the trajectory was stabilized by a kinematic synergy. Despite the greater segmental configuration variance of older adults, the strength of the synergy was not significantly different between groups. Moreover, the synergy index became negative during terminal swing and was not significantly correlated with SWV. Accordingly, co-variation among individual segmental trajectories is more important for stabilization of the swing trajectory during mid-swing, and, throughout swing, aging does not appear to affect this stabilization.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884986832&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884986832&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.04.023

DO - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.04.023

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 923

EP - 928

JO - Gait and Posture

JF - Gait and Posture

SN - 0966-6362

IS - 4

ER -