The effects of financial liberalization on savings and investment in Uruguay.

J. De Melo, James Tybout

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Deals with an empirical test of the Shaw-McKinnon hypothesis about the effects of financial liberalization on savings and investment. Three basic characteristics of the Uruguayan experience are first noted: the financial sector rapidly expanded, the private domestic savings rate did not increase; and foreign savings rushed into the country to finance an investment boom. Their empirical results are mixed. Although, as expected, financial savings increased substantially in the period of financial liberalization, private domestic savings did not seem to be responsive to changes in the rate of interest. Instead, foreign savings played a significant role. They also note that real exchange rate appreciation after 1978 tended to offset the benefits of deregulation. Investment behaviour also was not strongly correlated with financial liberalization. Also analyzes some apparent microeconomic consequences of the financial reform in Uruguay. -from Editors

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)561-587
Number of pages27
JournalEconomic Development & Cultural Change
Volume34
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1986

Fingerprint

Uruguay
liberalization
savings
investment behavior
financial reform
real exchange rate
microeconomics
deregulation
finance
effect
Savings
Financial liberalization
editor
Domestic savings
experience

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Development
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

@article{6eb0a1063cbe4fa48876080a82d286e3,
title = "The effects of financial liberalization on savings and investment in Uruguay.",
abstract = "Deals with an empirical test of the Shaw-McKinnon hypothesis about the effects of financial liberalization on savings and investment. Three basic characteristics of the Uruguayan experience are first noted: the financial sector rapidly expanded, the private domestic savings rate did not increase; and foreign savings rushed into the country to finance an investment boom. Their empirical results are mixed. Although, as expected, financial savings increased substantially in the period of financial liberalization, private domestic savings did not seem to be responsive to changes in the rate of interest. Instead, foreign savings played a significant role. They also note that real exchange rate appreciation after 1978 tended to offset the benefits of deregulation. Investment behaviour also was not strongly correlated with financial liberalization. Also analyzes some apparent microeconomic consequences of the financial reform in Uruguay. -from Editors",
author = "{De Melo}, J. and James Tybout",
year = "1986",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1086/451549",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "561--587",
journal = "Economic Development and Cultural Change",
issn = "0013-0079",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "3",

}

The effects of financial liberalization on savings and investment in Uruguay. / De Melo, J.; Tybout, James.

In: Economic Development & Cultural Change, Vol. 34, No. 3, 01.01.1986, p. 561-587.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of financial liberalization on savings and investment in Uruguay.

AU - De Melo, J.

AU - Tybout, James

PY - 1986/1/1

Y1 - 1986/1/1

N2 - Deals with an empirical test of the Shaw-McKinnon hypothesis about the effects of financial liberalization on savings and investment. Three basic characteristics of the Uruguayan experience are first noted: the financial sector rapidly expanded, the private domestic savings rate did not increase; and foreign savings rushed into the country to finance an investment boom. Their empirical results are mixed. Although, as expected, financial savings increased substantially in the period of financial liberalization, private domestic savings did not seem to be responsive to changes in the rate of interest. Instead, foreign savings played a significant role. They also note that real exchange rate appreciation after 1978 tended to offset the benefits of deregulation. Investment behaviour also was not strongly correlated with financial liberalization. Also analyzes some apparent microeconomic consequences of the financial reform in Uruguay. -from Editors

AB - Deals with an empirical test of the Shaw-McKinnon hypothesis about the effects of financial liberalization on savings and investment. Three basic characteristics of the Uruguayan experience are first noted: the financial sector rapidly expanded, the private domestic savings rate did not increase; and foreign savings rushed into the country to finance an investment boom. Their empirical results are mixed. Although, as expected, financial savings increased substantially in the period of financial liberalization, private domestic savings did not seem to be responsive to changes in the rate of interest. Instead, foreign savings played a significant role. They also note that real exchange rate appreciation after 1978 tended to offset the benefits of deregulation. Investment behaviour also was not strongly correlated with financial liberalization. Also analyzes some apparent microeconomic consequences of the financial reform in Uruguay. -from Editors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022834041&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022834041&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/451549

DO - 10.1086/451549

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0022834041

VL - 34

SP - 561

EP - 587

JO - Economic Development and Cultural Change

JF - Economic Development and Cultural Change

SN - 0013-0079

IS - 3

ER -