The Effects of Worry in Daily Life: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study Supporting the Tenets of the Contrast Avoidance Model

Michelle G. Newman, Nicholas C. Jacobson, Nur Hani Zainal, Ki Eun Shin, Lauren E. Szkodny, Martin J. Sliwinski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The contrast avoidance model (CAM) suggests that worry increases and sustains negative emotion to prevent a negative emotional contrast (sharp upward shift in negative emotion) and increase the probability of a positive contrast (shift toward positive emotion). In Study 1, we experimentally validated momentary assessment items (N = 25). In Study 2, participants with generalized anxiety disorder (N = 31) and controls (N = 37) were prompted once per hour regarding their worry, thought valence, and arousal 10 times a day for 8 days. Higher worry duration, negative thought valence, and uncontrollable train of thoughts predicted feeling more keyed up concurrently and sustained anxious activation 1 hr later. More worry, feeling keyed up, and uncontrollable train of thoughts predicted lower likelihood of a negative emotional contrast in thought valence and higher likelihood of a positive emotional contrast in thought valence 1 hr later. Findings support the prospective ecological validity of CAM. Our findings suggest that naturalistic worry reduces the likelihood of a sharp increase in negative affect and does so by increasing and sustaining anxious activation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)794-810
Number of pages17
JournalClinical Psychological Science
Volume7
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2019

Fingerprint

Emotions
Arousal
Anxiety Disorders
Ecological Momentary Assessment

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

@article{720a3385436f4b2ba2b932df506c35e9,
title = "The Effects of Worry in Daily Life: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study Supporting the Tenets of the Contrast Avoidance Model",
abstract = "The contrast avoidance model (CAM) suggests that worry increases and sustains negative emotion to prevent a negative emotional contrast (sharp upward shift in negative emotion) and increase the probability of a positive contrast (shift toward positive emotion). In Study 1, we experimentally validated momentary assessment items (N = 25). In Study 2, participants with generalized anxiety disorder (N = 31) and controls (N = 37) were prompted once per hour regarding their worry, thought valence, and arousal 10 times a day for 8 days. Higher worry duration, negative thought valence, and uncontrollable train of thoughts predicted feeling more keyed up concurrently and sustained anxious activation 1 hr later. More worry, feeling keyed up, and uncontrollable train of thoughts predicted lower likelihood of a negative emotional contrast in thought valence and higher likelihood of a positive emotional contrast in thought valence 1 hr later. Findings support the prospective ecological validity of CAM. Our findings suggest that naturalistic worry reduces the likelihood of a sharp increase in negative affect and does so by increasing and sustaining anxious activation.",
author = "Newman, {Michelle G.} and Jacobson, {Nicholas C.} and Zainal, {Nur Hani} and Shin, {Ki Eun} and Szkodny, {Lauren E.} and Sliwinski, {Martin J.}",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/2167702619827019",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "794--810",
journal = "Clinical Psychological Science",
issn = "2167-7026",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

The Effects of Worry in Daily Life : An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study Supporting the Tenets of the Contrast Avoidance Model. / Newman, Michelle G.; Jacobson, Nicholas C.; Zainal, Nur Hani; Shin, Ki Eun; Szkodny, Lauren E.; Sliwinski, Martin J.

In: Clinical Psychological Science, Vol. 7, No. 4, 01.07.2019, p. 794-810.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Effects of Worry in Daily Life

T2 - An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study Supporting the Tenets of the Contrast Avoidance Model

AU - Newman, Michelle G.

AU - Jacobson, Nicholas C.

AU - Zainal, Nur Hani

AU - Shin, Ki Eun

AU - Szkodny, Lauren E.

AU - Sliwinski, Martin J.

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - The contrast avoidance model (CAM) suggests that worry increases and sustains negative emotion to prevent a negative emotional contrast (sharp upward shift in negative emotion) and increase the probability of a positive contrast (shift toward positive emotion). In Study 1, we experimentally validated momentary assessment items (N = 25). In Study 2, participants with generalized anxiety disorder (N = 31) and controls (N = 37) were prompted once per hour regarding their worry, thought valence, and arousal 10 times a day for 8 days. Higher worry duration, negative thought valence, and uncontrollable train of thoughts predicted feeling more keyed up concurrently and sustained anxious activation 1 hr later. More worry, feeling keyed up, and uncontrollable train of thoughts predicted lower likelihood of a negative emotional contrast in thought valence and higher likelihood of a positive emotional contrast in thought valence 1 hr later. Findings support the prospective ecological validity of CAM. Our findings suggest that naturalistic worry reduces the likelihood of a sharp increase in negative affect and does so by increasing and sustaining anxious activation.

AB - The contrast avoidance model (CAM) suggests that worry increases and sustains negative emotion to prevent a negative emotional contrast (sharp upward shift in negative emotion) and increase the probability of a positive contrast (shift toward positive emotion). In Study 1, we experimentally validated momentary assessment items (N = 25). In Study 2, participants with generalized anxiety disorder (N = 31) and controls (N = 37) were prompted once per hour regarding their worry, thought valence, and arousal 10 times a day for 8 days. Higher worry duration, negative thought valence, and uncontrollable train of thoughts predicted feeling more keyed up concurrently and sustained anxious activation 1 hr later. More worry, feeling keyed up, and uncontrollable train of thoughts predicted lower likelihood of a negative emotional contrast in thought valence and higher likelihood of a positive emotional contrast in thought valence 1 hr later. Findings support the prospective ecological validity of CAM. Our findings suggest that naturalistic worry reduces the likelihood of a sharp increase in negative affect and does so by increasing and sustaining anxious activation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062572243&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062572243&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/2167702619827019

DO - 10.1177/2167702619827019

M3 - Article

C2 - 31372313

AN - SCOPUS:85062572243

VL - 7

SP - 794

EP - 810

JO - Clinical Psychological Science

JF - Clinical Psychological Science

SN - 2167-7026

IS - 4

ER -