The egenhofer–cohn hypothesis or, topological relativity?

Alexander Klippel, Rui Li, Jinlong Yang, Frank Hardisty, Sen Xu

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this chapter, we provide an overview of research on cognitively validating qualitative calculi, focusing on the region connection calculus (RCC) and Egenhofer’s intersection models (IM). These topological theories are often claimed to be foundational to spatial cognition, a concept we term the Egenhofer– Cohn Hypothesis. (The authors are aware of the limitations of the chosen title/ term. Neither Egenhofer nor Cohn necessarily support this claim in a strong form but they kindly agreed to have their names used here. Additionally, there are other approaches to topology, Cohn is the third author on the classic RCC paper, and Egenhofer published his work with co-authors. However, we feel that these two names best summarize the two most prominent topological theories in the spatial sciences.) We have been particularly interested in extending existing approaches into the realm of spatio-temporal representation and reasoning. We provide an overview on a series of experiments that we conducted to shed light on geographic event conceptualization and topology’s role in modeling and explaining cognitive behavior. Our framework also incorporates approaches to visually analyze cognitive behavior, allowing for interactive and in-depth analyses of cognitive conceptualizations. We present tangible results that can be distilled from generalizing from several experiments. These results show that the strong version of the Egenhofer– Cohn Hypothesis is not supported by all results; we suggest amendments to topological relationship specifications that are needed to serve as a sufficient basis for bridging formal and observed human spatial cognitive processes. We term this approach topological relativity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)195-215
Number of pages21
JournalLecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography
Issue number199629
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013
Event20th Anniversary Meeting on Cognitive and Linguistic Aspects of Geographic Space, 2010 - Las Navas del Marques, Avila, Spain
Duration: Jul 4 2010Jul 8 2010

Fingerprint

Relativity
cognition
Experiments
experiment
spatial cognition
Topology
Specifications
amendment
topology
event
science
modeling

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Earth-Surface Processes
  • Computers in Earth Sciences

Cite this

Klippel, Alexander ; Li, Rui ; Yang, Jinlong ; Hardisty, Frank ; Xu, Sen. / The egenhofer–cohn hypothesis or, topological relativity?. In: Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. 2013 ; No. 199629. pp. 195-215.
@article{7bc8918917a24282b17a2dbb61878fa7,
title = "The egenhofer–cohn hypothesis or, topological relativity?",
abstract = "In this chapter, we provide an overview of research on cognitively validating qualitative calculi, focusing on the region connection calculus (RCC) and Egenhofer’s intersection models (IM). These topological theories are often claimed to be foundational to spatial cognition, a concept we term the Egenhofer– Cohn Hypothesis. (The authors are aware of the limitations of the chosen title/ term. Neither Egenhofer nor Cohn necessarily support this claim in a strong form but they kindly agreed to have their names used here. Additionally, there are other approaches to topology, Cohn is the third author on the classic RCC paper, and Egenhofer published his work with co-authors. However, we feel that these two names best summarize the two most prominent topological theories in the spatial sciences.) We have been particularly interested in extending existing approaches into the realm of spatio-temporal representation and reasoning. We provide an overview on a series of experiments that we conducted to shed light on geographic event conceptualization and topology’s role in modeling and explaining cognitive behavior. Our framework also incorporates approaches to visually analyze cognitive behavior, allowing for interactive and in-depth analyses of cognitive conceptualizations. We present tangible results that can be distilled from generalizing from several experiments. These results show that the strong version of the Egenhofer– Cohn Hypothesis is not supported by all results; we suggest amendments to topological relationship specifications that are needed to serve as a sufficient basis for bridging formal and observed human spatial cognitive processes. We term this approach topological relativity.",
author = "Alexander Klippel and Rui Li and Jinlong Yang and Frank Hardisty and Sen Xu",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-642-34359-9_11",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "195--215",
journal = "Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography",
issn = "1863-2351",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing AG",
number = "199629",

}

The egenhofer–cohn hypothesis or, topological relativity? / Klippel, Alexander; Li, Rui; Yang, Jinlong; Hardisty, Frank; Xu, Sen.

In: Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography, No. 199629, 01.01.2013, p. 195-215.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

TY - JOUR

T1 - The egenhofer–cohn hypothesis or, topological relativity?

AU - Klippel, Alexander

AU - Li, Rui

AU - Yang, Jinlong

AU - Hardisty, Frank

AU - Xu, Sen

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - In this chapter, we provide an overview of research on cognitively validating qualitative calculi, focusing on the region connection calculus (RCC) and Egenhofer’s intersection models (IM). These topological theories are often claimed to be foundational to spatial cognition, a concept we term the Egenhofer– Cohn Hypothesis. (The authors are aware of the limitations of the chosen title/ term. Neither Egenhofer nor Cohn necessarily support this claim in a strong form but they kindly agreed to have their names used here. Additionally, there are other approaches to topology, Cohn is the third author on the classic RCC paper, and Egenhofer published his work with co-authors. However, we feel that these two names best summarize the two most prominent topological theories in the spatial sciences.) We have been particularly interested in extending existing approaches into the realm of spatio-temporal representation and reasoning. We provide an overview on a series of experiments that we conducted to shed light on geographic event conceptualization and topology’s role in modeling and explaining cognitive behavior. Our framework also incorporates approaches to visually analyze cognitive behavior, allowing for interactive and in-depth analyses of cognitive conceptualizations. We present tangible results that can be distilled from generalizing from several experiments. These results show that the strong version of the Egenhofer– Cohn Hypothesis is not supported by all results; we suggest amendments to topological relationship specifications that are needed to serve as a sufficient basis for bridging formal and observed human spatial cognitive processes. We term this approach topological relativity.

AB - In this chapter, we provide an overview of research on cognitively validating qualitative calculi, focusing on the region connection calculus (RCC) and Egenhofer’s intersection models (IM). These topological theories are often claimed to be foundational to spatial cognition, a concept we term the Egenhofer– Cohn Hypothesis. (The authors are aware of the limitations of the chosen title/ term. Neither Egenhofer nor Cohn necessarily support this claim in a strong form but they kindly agreed to have their names used here. Additionally, there are other approaches to topology, Cohn is the third author on the classic RCC paper, and Egenhofer published his work with co-authors. However, we feel that these two names best summarize the two most prominent topological theories in the spatial sciences.) We have been particularly interested in extending existing approaches into the realm of spatio-temporal representation and reasoning. We provide an overview on a series of experiments that we conducted to shed light on geographic event conceptualization and topology’s role in modeling and explaining cognitive behavior. Our framework also incorporates approaches to visually analyze cognitive behavior, allowing for interactive and in-depth analyses of cognitive conceptualizations. We present tangible results that can be distilled from generalizing from several experiments. These results show that the strong version of the Egenhofer– Cohn Hypothesis is not supported by all results; we suggest amendments to topological relationship specifications that are needed to serve as a sufficient basis for bridging formal and observed human spatial cognitive processes. We term this approach topological relativity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879771938&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84879771938&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-642-34359-9_11

DO - 10.1007/978-3-642-34359-9_11

M3 - Conference article

SP - 195

EP - 215

JO - Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography

JF - Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography

SN - 1863-2351

IS - 199629

ER -