The European court of justice and the annulment of the tobacco advertisement directive: Friend of national sovereignty or foe of public health?

George Tridimas, Panagiotis Tridimas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In Case C-376/98 Germany ν Council the European Court of Justice annulled a Directive which banned the advertisement and sponsorship of tobacco. The judgment sanctions regulatory policy-making at the national rather than the Community level. The paper examines the legal basis of the annulment, its effect on economic efficiency and the implied role of the Court in the formulation of public policy in Europe. Within the institutional limits of the judicial power to determine policy, the Court focused on whether or not disparate national laws restrict free movement and distort competition and affirmed the primacy of the nation state to regulate economic activity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)171-183
Number of pages13
JournalEuropean Journal of Law and Economics
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2002

Fingerprint

European Court of Justice
sovereignty
nicotine
public health
judicial power
legal basis
regulatory policy
sponsorship
economic efficiency
sanction
nation state
public policy
Law
community
economics
Public health
Tobacco
Sovereignty
Economic activity
Regulatory policy

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business and International Management
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Law

Cite this

@article{e3a47494f24c423db37cded695bf03fc,
title = "The European court of justice and the annulment of the tobacco advertisement directive: Friend of national sovereignty or foe of public health?",
abstract = "In Case C-376/98 Germany ν Council the European Court of Justice annulled a Directive which banned the advertisement and sponsorship of tobacco. The judgment sanctions regulatory policy-making at the national rather than the Community level. The paper examines the legal basis of the annulment, its effect on economic efficiency and the implied role of the Court in the formulation of public policy in Europe. Within the institutional limits of the judicial power to determine policy, the Court focused on whether or not disparate national laws restrict free movement and distort competition and affirmed the primacy of the nation state to regulate economic activity.",
author = "George Tridimas and Panagiotis Tridimas",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1023/A:1016558909557",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "171--183",
journal = "European Journal of Law and Economics",
issn = "0929-1261",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The European court of justice and the annulment of the tobacco advertisement directive

T2 - Friend of national sovereignty or foe of public health?

AU - Tridimas, George

AU - Tridimas, Panagiotis

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - In Case C-376/98 Germany ν Council the European Court of Justice annulled a Directive which banned the advertisement and sponsorship of tobacco. The judgment sanctions regulatory policy-making at the national rather than the Community level. The paper examines the legal basis of the annulment, its effect on economic efficiency and the implied role of the Court in the formulation of public policy in Europe. Within the institutional limits of the judicial power to determine policy, the Court focused on whether or not disparate national laws restrict free movement and distort competition and affirmed the primacy of the nation state to regulate economic activity.

AB - In Case C-376/98 Germany ν Council the European Court of Justice annulled a Directive which banned the advertisement and sponsorship of tobacco. The judgment sanctions regulatory policy-making at the national rather than the Community level. The paper examines the legal basis of the annulment, its effect on economic efficiency and the implied role of the Court in the formulation of public policy in Europe. Within the institutional limits of the judicial power to determine policy, the Court focused on whether or not disparate national laws restrict free movement and distort competition and affirmed the primacy of the nation state to regulate economic activity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0742281521&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0742281521&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/A:1016558909557

DO - 10.1023/A:1016558909557

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0742281521

VL - 14

SP - 171

EP - 183

JO - European Journal of Law and Economics

JF - European Journal of Law and Economics

SN - 0929-1261

IS - 2

ER -