The European union interest system in Comparative Perspective: A Bridge Too Far?

David Lynn Lowery, Caelesta Poppelaars, Joost Berkhout

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Can we meaningfully compare within a single theoretical framework the politics of interest representation in the European Union with its counterparts in the United States and other national political systems? We address this question by first considering several candidate explanations for the lack of broad-ranging comparative research on interest representation, focusing in the end on the problem of context. We then argue that much of the recent progress in the literature is a result more of segmentation of theoretical issues. The third section discusses how this successful strategy of segmentation has unfortunately raised new theoretical barriers to comparative analysis. This argument is explored by comparing work on organised interests in the EU with two other cases - the hyper-pluralistic interest politics of the United States and the neo-corporatist politics of the Netherlands.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1231-1252
Number of pages22
JournalWest European Politics
Volume31
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 27 2008

Fingerprint

politics
representation of interests
comparative research
political system
Netherlands
candidacy
EU
lack
segmentation
literature

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Lowery, David Lynn ; Poppelaars, Caelesta ; Berkhout, Joost. / The European union interest system in Comparative Perspective : A Bridge Too Far?. In: West European Politics. 2008 ; Vol. 31, No. 6. pp. 1231-1252.
@article{c3a3c3ece2684bcab01b57d2e4fb8952,
title = "The European union interest system in Comparative Perspective: A Bridge Too Far?",
abstract = "Can we meaningfully compare within a single theoretical framework the politics of interest representation in the European Union with its counterparts in the United States and other national political systems? We address this question by first considering several candidate explanations for the lack of broad-ranging comparative research on interest representation, focusing in the end on the problem of context. We then argue that much of the recent progress in the literature is a result more of segmentation of theoretical issues. The third section discusses how this successful strategy of segmentation has unfortunately raised new theoretical barriers to comparative analysis. This argument is explored by comparing work on organised interests in the EU with two other cases - the hyper-pluralistic interest politics of the United States and the neo-corporatist politics of the Netherlands.",
author = "Lowery, {David Lynn} and Caelesta Poppelaars and Joost Berkhout",
year = "2008",
month = "10",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1080/01402380802372670",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "1231--1252",
journal = "West European Politics",
issn = "0140-2382",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "6",

}

The European union interest system in Comparative Perspective : A Bridge Too Far? / Lowery, David Lynn; Poppelaars, Caelesta; Berkhout, Joost.

In: West European Politics, Vol. 31, No. 6, 27.10.2008, p. 1231-1252.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The European union interest system in Comparative Perspective

T2 - A Bridge Too Far?

AU - Lowery, David Lynn

AU - Poppelaars, Caelesta

AU - Berkhout, Joost

PY - 2008/10/27

Y1 - 2008/10/27

N2 - Can we meaningfully compare within a single theoretical framework the politics of interest representation in the European Union with its counterparts in the United States and other national political systems? We address this question by first considering several candidate explanations for the lack of broad-ranging comparative research on interest representation, focusing in the end on the problem of context. We then argue that much of the recent progress in the literature is a result more of segmentation of theoretical issues. The third section discusses how this successful strategy of segmentation has unfortunately raised new theoretical barriers to comparative analysis. This argument is explored by comparing work on organised interests in the EU with two other cases - the hyper-pluralistic interest politics of the United States and the neo-corporatist politics of the Netherlands.

AB - Can we meaningfully compare within a single theoretical framework the politics of interest representation in the European Union with its counterparts in the United States and other national political systems? We address this question by first considering several candidate explanations for the lack of broad-ranging comparative research on interest representation, focusing in the end on the problem of context. We then argue that much of the recent progress in the literature is a result more of segmentation of theoretical issues. The third section discusses how this successful strategy of segmentation has unfortunately raised new theoretical barriers to comparative analysis. This argument is explored by comparing work on organised interests in the EU with two other cases - the hyper-pluralistic interest politics of the United States and the neo-corporatist politics of the Netherlands.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=54249164981&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=54249164981&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01402380802372670

DO - 10.1080/01402380802372670

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:54249164981

VL - 31

SP - 1231

EP - 1252

JO - West European Politics

JF - West European Politics

SN - 0140-2382

IS - 6

ER -