The evaluation of parental fitness in termination of parental rights cases

A functional-contextual perspective

Sandra T. Azar, Allison F. Lauretti, Bruce V. Loding

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article highlights issues involved in carrying out evaluations for termination of parental rights cases and suggests caution for mental health professionals doing such evaluations. It argues that current models of parenting that come from the child development and child maltreatment fields are too narrow in their focus to act as a foundation for such evaluations and are often based on research with select groups in our society making them open to bias. Similarly, it is argued that traditional assessment measures are limited in their utility for responding to the kinds of relational and basic care questions asked in such evaluations. A functional-contextual model is offered as an alternative with examples of potentially useful measurement strategies. With such a frame as a starting point, the field might progress to providing more useful information to courts. Future research directions to improve this practice arena are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)77-100
Number of pages24
JournalClinical Child and Family Psychology Review
Volume1
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1998

Fingerprint

fitness
evaluation
Child Abuse
Parenting
maltreatment
Child Development
health professionals
Mental Health
mental health
trend
Research
Group

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

@article{8074109919634647af167e3e4b8ae172,
title = "The evaluation of parental fitness in termination of parental rights cases: A functional-contextual perspective",
abstract = "This article highlights issues involved in carrying out evaluations for termination of parental rights cases and suggests caution for mental health professionals doing such evaluations. It argues that current models of parenting that come from the child development and child maltreatment fields are too narrow in their focus to act as a foundation for such evaluations and are often based on research with select groups in our society making them open to bias. Similarly, it is argued that traditional assessment measures are limited in their utility for responding to the kinds of relational and basic care questions asked in such evaluations. A functional-contextual model is offered as an alternative with examples of potentially useful measurement strategies. With such a frame as a starting point, the field might progress to providing more useful information to courts. Future research directions to improve this practice arena are discussed.",
author = "Azar, {Sandra T.} and Lauretti, {Allison F.} and Loding, {Bruce V.}",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1023/A:1021883611965",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "77--100",
journal = "Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review",
issn = "1096-4037",
publisher = "Kluwer Academic Publishers",
number = "2",

}

The evaluation of parental fitness in termination of parental rights cases : A functional-contextual perspective. / Azar, Sandra T.; Lauretti, Allison F.; Loding, Bruce V.

In: Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, Vol. 1, No. 2, 01.01.1998, p. 77-100.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The evaluation of parental fitness in termination of parental rights cases

T2 - A functional-contextual perspective

AU - Azar, Sandra T.

AU - Lauretti, Allison F.

AU - Loding, Bruce V.

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - This article highlights issues involved in carrying out evaluations for termination of parental rights cases and suggests caution for mental health professionals doing such evaluations. It argues that current models of parenting that come from the child development and child maltreatment fields are too narrow in their focus to act as a foundation for such evaluations and are often based on research with select groups in our society making them open to bias. Similarly, it is argued that traditional assessment measures are limited in their utility for responding to the kinds of relational and basic care questions asked in such evaluations. A functional-contextual model is offered as an alternative with examples of potentially useful measurement strategies. With such a frame as a starting point, the field might progress to providing more useful information to courts. Future research directions to improve this practice arena are discussed.

AB - This article highlights issues involved in carrying out evaluations for termination of parental rights cases and suggests caution for mental health professionals doing such evaluations. It argues that current models of parenting that come from the child development and child maltreatment fields are too narrow in their focus to act as a foundation for such evaluations and are often based on research with select groups in our society making them open to bias. Similarly, it is argued that traditional assessment measures are limited in their utility for responding to the kinds of relational and basic care questions asked in such evaluations. A functional-contextual model is offered as an alternative with examples of potentially useful measurement strategies. With such a frame as a starting point, the field might progress to providing more useful information to courts. Future research directions to improve this practice arena are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032081878&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032081878&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/A:1021883611965

DO - 10.1023/A:1021883611965

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 77

EP - 100

JO - Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review

JF - Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review

SN - 1096-4037

IS - 2

ER -