The evolutionary role of interorganizational communication: Modeling social capital in disaster contexts

Marya L. Doerfel, Chih Hui Lai, Lisa V. Chewning

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Employing a community ecology perspective, this study examines how interorganizational (IO) communication and social capital (SC) facilitated organizational recovery after Hurricane Katrina. In-depth interviews with 56 New Orleans organizations enabled longitudinal analysis and a grounded theory model that illustrates how communication differentiated four phases of recovery: personal emergency, professional emergency, transition, rebuilding. Communicative action taking place across phases corresponds with the evolutionary mechanisms. Most organizations did not turn to interorganizational relationships (IORs) until the transitional phase, during which indirect ties were critical and incoming versus outgoing communication was substantively different. Organizations did not consistently use IO SC until the last phase. This study underlines the fact that organizations and their systems are fundamentally human and (re)constructed through communicative action.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)125-162
Number of pages38
JournalHuman Communication Research
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2010

Fingerprint

Disasters
social capital
disaster
Communication
Organizations
communicative action
communication
Emergencies
Cyclonic Storms
Recovery
Hurricanes
Ecology
grounded theory
ecology
Interviews
Social Capital
interview
community

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Anthropology
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

@article{51d92a71c669431d848468d0894958a5,
title = "The evolutionary role of interorganizational communication: Modeling social capital in disaster contexts",
abstract = "Employing a community ecology perspective, this study examines how interorganizational (IO) communication and social capital (SC) facilitated organizational recovery after Hurricane Katrina. In-depth interviews with 56 New Orleans organizations enabled longitudinal analysis and a grounded theory model that illustrates how communication differentiated four phases of recovery: personal emergency, professional emergency, transition, rebuilding. Communicative action taking place across phases corresponds with the evolutionary mechanisms. Most organizations did not turn to interorganizational relationships (IORs) until the transitional phase, during which indirect ties were critical and incoming versus outgoing communication was substantively different. Organizations did not consistently use IO SC until the last phase. This study underlines the fact that organizations and their systems are fundamentally human and (re)constructed through communicative action.",
author = "Doerfel, {Marya L.} and Lai, {Chih Hui} and Chewning, {Lisa V.}",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01371.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "125--162",
journal = "Human Communication Research",
issn = "0360-3989",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

The evolutionary role of interorganizational communication : Modeling social capital in disaster contexts. / Doerfel, Marya L.; Lai, Chih Hui; Chewning, Lisa V.

In: Human Communication Research, Vol. 36, No. 2, 01.04.2010, p. 125-162.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The evolutionary role of interorganizational communication

T2 - Modeling social capital in disaster contexts

AU - Doerfel, Marya L.

AU - Lai, Chih Hui

AU - Chewning, Lisa V.

PY - 2010/4/1

Y1 - 2010/4/1

N2 - Employing a community ecology perspective, this study examines how interorganizational (IO) communication and social capital (SC) facilitated organizational recovery after Hurricane Katrina. In-depth interviews with 56 New Orleans organizations enabled longitudinal analysis and a grounded theory model that illustrates how communication differentiated four phases of recovery: personal emergency, professional emergency, transition, rebuilding. Communicative action taking place across phases corresponds with the evolutionary mechanisms. Most organizations did not turn to interorganizational relationships (IORs) until the transitional phase, during which indirect ties were critical and incoming versus outgoing communication was substantively different. Organizations did not consistently use IO SC until the last phase. This study underlines the fact that organizations and their systems are fundamentally human and (re)constructed through communicative action.

AB - Employing a community ecology perspective, this study examines how interorganizational (IO) communication and social capital (SC) facilitated organizational recovery after Hurricane Katrina. In-depth interviews with 56 New Orleans organizations enabled longitudinal analysis and a grounded theory model that illustrates how communication differentiated four phases of recovery: personal emergency, professional emergency, transition, rebuilding. Communicative action taking place across phases corresponds with the evolutionary mechanisms. Most organizations did not turn to interorganizational relationships (IORs) until the transitional phase, during which indirect ties were critical and incoming versus outgoing communication was substantively different. Organizations did not consistently use IO SC until the last phase. This study underlines the fact that organizations and their systems are fundamentally human and (re)constructed through communicative action.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951226763&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77951226763&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01371.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01371.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77951226763

VL - 36

SP - 125

EP - 162

JO - Human Communication Research

JF - Human Communication Research

SN - 0360-3989

IS - 2

ER -