The evolving 5G case study in spectrum management and industrial policy

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

Even before the International Telecommunication Union (“ITU”) reaches consensus on spectrum allocations for fifth generation wireless technologies (“5G”), commercial ventures scramble to offer new equipment and services. Expediting 5G wireless service can benefit consumers and businesses at the risk of stressing the traditional process of spectrum planning that combines study, dialogue and consensus building at ITU conferences. This paper explains why most nations refused to endorse key United States 5G spectrum allocation proposals at the ITU's, 2015 World Radio Conference. U.S. representatives underestimated the time needed for consensus building, despite increasing demand for wireless video and the evolving Internet of Things. Other contributing factors include U.S. support for treating spectrum like property, use of “incentive auctions” to clear broadcast television spectrum with unprecedented speed and enough existing wireless spectrum allocations in most nations. The paper concludes that the U.S. cannot expect faster frequency reallocations, particularly when it and other nations pursue matters having little to do with spectrum optimization. The paper offers recommendations on best practices for improving the consensus building process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)549-562
Number of pages14
JournalTelecommunications Policy
Volume43
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2019

Fingerprint

industrial policy
management
telecommunication
Telecommunication
television broadcast
auction
best practice
radio
Television
video
dialogue
incentive
Internet
planning
demand
Planning
Industry

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Information Systems
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

@article{1bd9a97cb4b54ec6a705dede0cb4194a,
title = "The evolving 5G case study in spectrum management and industrial policy",
abstract = "Even before the International Telecommunication Union (“ITU”) reaches consensus on spectrum allocations for fifth generation wireless technologies (“5G”), commercial ventures scramble to offer new equipment and services. Expediting 5G wireless service can benefit consumers and businesses at the risk of stressing the traditional process of spectrum planning that combines study, dialogue and consensus building at ITU conferences. This paper explains why most nations refused to endorse key United States 5G spectrum allocation proposals at the ITU's, 2015 World Radio Conference. U.S. representatives underestimated the time needed for consensus building, despite increasing demand for wireless video and the evolving Internet of Things. Other contributing factors include U.S. support for treating spectrum like property, use of “incentive auctions” to clear broadcast television spectrum with unprecedented speed and enough existing wireless spectrum allocations in most nations. The paper concludes that the U.S. cannot expect faster frequency reallocations, particularly when it and other nations pursue matters having little to do with spectrum optimization. The paper offers recommendations on best practices for improving the consensus building process.",
author = "Frieden, {Robert Milner}",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.telpol.2019.04.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "549--562",
journal = "Telecommunications Policy",
issn = "0308-5961",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "6",

}

The evolving 5G case study in spectrum management and industrial policy. / Frieden, Robert Milner.

In: Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 43, No. 6, 01.07.2019, p. 549-562.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

TY - JOUR

T1 - The evolving 5G case study in spectrum management and industrial policy

AU - Frieden, Robert Milner

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - Even before the International Telecommunication Union (“ITU”) reaches consensus on spectrum allocations for fifth generation wireless technologies (“5G”), commercial ventures scramble to offer new equipment and services. Expediting 5G wireless service can benefit consumers and businesses at the risk of stressing the traditional process of spectrum planning that combines study, dialogue and consensus building at ITU conferences. This paper explains why most nations refused to endorse key United States 5G spectrum allocation proposals at the ITU's, 2015 World Radio Conference. U.S. representatives underestimated the time needed for consensus building, despite increasing demand for wireless video and the evolving Internet of Things. Other contributing factors include U.S. support for treating spectrum like property, use of “incentive auctions” to clear broadcast television spectrum with unprecedented speed and enough existing wireless spectrum allocations in most nations. The paper concludes that the U.S. cannot expect faster frequency reallocations, particularly when it and other nations pursue matters having little to do with spectrum optimization. The paper offers recommendations on best practices for improving the consensus building process.

AB - Even before the International Telecommunication Union (“ITU”) reaches consensus on spectrum allocations for fifth generation wireless technologies (“5G”), commercial ventures scramble to offer new equipment and services. Expediting 5G wireless service can benefit consumers and businesses at the risk of stressing the traditional process of spectrum planning that combines study, dialogue and consensus building at ITU conferences. This paper explains why most nations refused to endorse key United States 5G spectrum allocation proposals at the ITU's, 2015 World Radio Conference. U.S. representatives underestimated the time needed for consensus building, despite increasing demand for wireless video and the evolving Internet of Things. Other contributing factors include U.S. support for treating spectrum like property, use of “incentive auctions” to clear broadcast television spectrum with unprecedented speed and enough existing wireless spectrum allocations in most nations. The paper concludes that the U.S. cannot expect faster frequency reallocations, particularly when it and other nations pursue matters having little to do with spectrum optimization. The paper offers recommendations on best practices for improving the consensus building process.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065207660&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065207660&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.telpol.2019.04.001

DO - 10.1016/j.telpol.2019.04.001

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85065207660

VL - 43

SP - 549

EP - 562

JO - Telecommunications Policy

JF - Telecommunications Policy

SN - 0308-5961

IS - 6

ER -