The fallacy of using NII in analyzing aircraft operations

Robert Graham Melton, Ira D. Jacobson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Three measures of noise annoyance (Noise Impact Index, Level-Weighted Population, and Annoyed Population Number) are compared regarding their utility in assessing noise reduction schemes for aircraft operations. While Nil is intended to measure the average annoyance per person in a community, it is found that the method of averaging can lead to erroneous conclusions, particularly if the population does not have uniform spatial distribution. Level-Weighted Population Annoyed Population Number are shown to be better indicators of noise annoyance when rating different strategies for noise reduction in a given community.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)151-154
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Aircraft
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1984

Fingerprint

Noise abatement
Aircraft
Acoustic noise
Spatial distribution

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Aerospace Engineering

Cite this

Melton, Robert Graham ; Jacobson, Ira D. / The fallacy of using NII in analyzing aircraft operations. In: Journal of Aircraft. 1984 ; Vol. 21, No. 2. pp. 151-154.
@article{8b433cdb025146a5a6c36b81e22a5124,
title = "The fallacy of using NII in analyzing aircraft operations",
abstract = "Three measures of noise annoyance (Noise Impact Index, Level-Weighted Population, and Annoyed Population Number) are compared regarding their utility in assessing noise reduction schemes for aircraft operations. While Nil is intended to measure the average annoyance per person in a community, it is found that the method of averaging can lead to erroneous conclusions, particularly if the population does not have uniform spatial distribution. Level-Weighted Population Annoyed Population Number are shown to be better indicators of noise annoyance when rating different strategies for noise reduction in a given community.",
author = "Melton, {Robert Graham} and Jacobson, {Ira D.}",
year = "1984",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2514/3.48238",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "151--154",
journal = "Journal of Aircraft",
issn = "0021-8669",
publisher = "American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc. (AIAA)",
number = "2",

}

The fallacy of using NII in analyzing aircraft operations. / Melton, Robert Graham; Jacobson, Ira D.

In: Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 21, No. 2, 01.01.1984, p. 151-154.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The fallacy of using NII in analyzing aircraft operations

AU - Melton, Robert Graham

AU - Jacobson, Ira D.

PY - 1984/1/1

Y1 - 1984/1/1

N2 - Three measures of noise annoyance (Noise Impact Index, Level-Weighted Population, and Annoyed Population Number) are compared regarding their utility in assessing noise reduction schemes for aircraft operations. While Nil is intended to measure the average annoyance per person in a community, it is found that the method of averaging can lead to erroneous conclusions, particularly if the population does not have uniform spatial distribution. Level-Weighted Population Annoyed Population Number are shown to be better indicators of noise annoyance when rating different strategies for noise reduction in a given community.

AB - Three measures of noise annoyance (Noise Impact Index, Level-Weighted Population, and Annoyed Population Number) are compared regarding their utility in assessing noise reduction schemes for aircraft operations. While Nil is intended to measure the average annoyance per person in a community, it is found that the method of averaging can lead to erroneous conclusions, particularly if the population does not have uniform spatial distribution. Level-Weighted Population Annoyed Population Number are shown to be better indicators of noise annoyance when rating different strategies for noise reduction in a given community.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021376977&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021376977&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2514/3.48238

DO - 10.2514/3.48238

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 151

EP - 154

JO - Journal of Aircraft

JF - Journal of Aircraft

SN - 0021-8669

IS - 2

ER -