The "family/couple/household" unit of measurement in poverty estimation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The unit of measurement used in poverty estimation continues to receive critical scrutiny. The debate revolves around what is the most appropriate unit- the family, the household, or some other entity. This analysis discusses the existing options and offers a conceptually more refined alternative: the "family/couple/household" (FCH) unit, which assumes income pooling among family members, including cohabiting couples, but not among non-relatives, and takes into account the benefits from economies of scale for all household members. Poverty rates are estimated using alternative definitions. Overall, empirical results show modestly lower poverty rates when household-level economies of scale are taken into account. The difference is largest for persons living in nontraditional household arrangements, such as cohabitors and non-family members.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)253-265
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Economic and Social Measurement
Volume26
Issue number3-4
StatePublished - Dec 1 2000

Fingerprint

poverty
economy
family member
income
human being

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

@article{8b92e8839b0b4964a965b9c8d8d0529a,
title = "The {"}family/couple/household{"} unit of measurement in poverty estimation",
abstract = "The unit of measurement used in poverty estimation continues to receive critical scrutiny. The debate revolves around what is the most appropriate unit- the family, the household, or some other entity. This analysis discusses the existing options and offers a conceptually more refined alternative: the {"}family/couple/household{"} (FCH) unit, which assumes income pooling among family members, including cohabiting couples, but not among non-relatives, and takes into account the benefits from economies of scale for all household members. Poverty rates are estimated using alternative definitions. Overall, empirical results show modestly lower poverty rates when household-level economies of scale are taken into account. The difference is largest for persons living in nontraditional household arrangements, such as cohabitors and non-family members.",
author = "Iceland, {John David}",
year = "2000",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "253--265",
journal = "Journal of Economic and Social Measurement",
issn = "0747-9662",
publisher = "IOS Press",
number = "3-4",

}

The "family/couple/household" unit of measurement in poverty estimation. / Iceland, John David.

In: Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, Vol. 26, No. 3-4, 01.12.2000, p. 253-265.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The "family/couple/household" unit of measurement in poverty estimation

AU - Iceland, John David

PY - 2000/12/1

Y1 - 2000/12/1

N2 - The unit of measurement used in poverty estimation continues to receive critical scrutiny. The debate revolves around what is the most appropriate unit- the family, the household, or some other entity. This analysis discusses the existing options and offers a conceptually more refined alternative: the "family/couple/household" (FCH) unit, which assumes income pooling among family members, including cohabiting couples, but not among non-relatives, and takes into account the benefits from economies of scale for all household members. Poverty rates are estimated using alternative definitions. Overall, empirical results show modestly lower poverty rates when household-level economies of scale are taken into account. The difference is largest for persons living in nontraditional household arrangements, such as cohabitors and non-family members.

AB - The unit of measurement used in poverty estimation continues to receive critical scrutiny. The debate revolves around what is the most appropriate unit- the family, the household, or some other entity. This analysis discusses the existing options and offers a conceptually more refined alternative: the "family/couple/household" (FCH) unit, which assumes income pooling among family members, including cohabiting couples, but not among non-relatives, and takes into account the benefits from economies of scale for all household members. Poverty rates are estimated using alternative definitions. Overall, empirical results show modestly lower poverty rates when household-level economies of scale are taken into account. The difference is largest for persons living in nontraditional household arrangements, such as cohabitors and non-family members.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035674092&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035674092&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0035674092

VL - 26

SP - 253

EP - 265

JO - Journal of Economic and Social Measurement

JF - Journal of Economic and Social Measurement

SN - 0747-9662

IS - 3-4

ER -