The Gap Between Perceived and Actual Learning From Group Reflection

Alexander R. Bolinger, Julie Stanton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Group reflection is often used as an intervention to facilitate group performance, but reflecting in groups may also affect individual learning. In this article, we compare the effects of individual and group reflection on individuals’ learning in two pairs of decision-making tasks. In two studies, we found that individuals who reflected in groups improved their performance from Task 1 to 2. However, individuals who reflected in groups did not realize greater performance improvements than individuals who reflected alone. Furthermore, individuals who reflected alone perceived that they learned more than individuals who reflected in groups. We discuss the implications of the gap between perceived and actual learning and describe the implications of our findings for group research, as well as recommendations for future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)539-567
Number of pages29
JournalSmall Group Research
Volume45
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Learning
Task Performance and Analysis
Decision Making
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

@article{5a362d8fb93d4d71867645e31d6fdef6,
title = "The Gap Between Perceived and Actual Learning From Group Reflection",
abstract = "Group reflection is often used as an intervention to facilitate group performance, but reflecting in groups may also affect individual learning. In this article, we compare the effects of individual and group reflection on individuals’ learning in two pairs of decision-making tasks. In two studies, we found that individuals who reflected in groups improved their performance from Task 1 to 2. However, individuals who reflected in groups did not realize greater performance improvements than individuals who reflected alone. Furthermore, individuals who reflected alone perceived that they learned more than individuals who reflected in groups. We discuss the implications of the gap between perceived and actual learning and describe the implications of our findings for group research, as well as recommendations for future research.",
author = "Bolinger, {Alexander R.} and Julie Stanton",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1046496414538322",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "539--567",
journal = "Small Group Research",
issn = "1046-4964",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "5",

}

The Gap Between Perceived and Actual Learning From Group Reflection. / Bolinger, Alexander R.; Stanton, Julie.

In: Small Group Research, Vol. 45, No. 5, 01.01.2014, p. 539-567.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Gap Between Perceived and Actual Learning From Group Reflection

AU - Bolinger, Alexander R.

AU - Stanton, Julie

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Group reflection is often used as an intervention to facilitate group performance, but reflecting in groups may also affect individual learning. In this article, we compare the effects of individual and group reflection on individuals’ learning in two pairs of decision-making tasks. In two studies, we found that individuals who reflected in groups improved their performance from Task 1 to 2. However, individuals who reflected in groups did not realize greater performance improvements than individuals who reflected alone. Furthermore, individuals who reflected alone perceived that they learned more than individuals who reflected in groups. We discuss the implications of the gap between perceived and actual learning and describe the implications of our findings for group research, as well as recommendations for future research.

AB - Group reflection is often used as an intervention to facilitate group performance, but reflecting in groups may also affect individual learning. In this article, we compare the effects of individual and group reflection on individuals’ learning in two pairs of decision-making tasks. In two studies, we found that individuals who reflected in groups improved their performance from Task 1 to 2. However, individuals who reflected in groups did not realize greater performance improvements than individuals who reflected alone. Furthermore, individuals who reflected alone perceived that they learned more than individuals who reflected in groups. We discuss the implications of the gap between perceived and actual learning and describe the implications of our findings for group research, as well as recommendations for future research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907088099&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907088099&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1046496414538322

DO - 10.1177/1046496414538322

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 539

EP - 567

JO - Small Group Research

JF - Small Group Research

SN - 1046-4964

IS - 5

ER -