The genealogy detectives

A constitutional analysis of "familial searching"

David H. Kaye

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

"Familial searching" in law enforcement DNA databases has been pilloried as a step "towards eugenics and corruption of blood" and "lifelong genetic surveillance" that is "inconsistent with a basic pillar of American political thought." Courts have yet to address the issue fully, but several commentators contend the practice is unwise, unjust, or unconstitutional. This Article examines the more significant constitutional claims. It concludes that although kinship matching should not be implemented simply because it is technologically seductive, neither should it be removed from the realm of permissible law enforcement information gathering on constitutional grounds. In reaching this conclusion, the Article describes the logic of kinship analysis; clarifies the nature of partial-match searching; shows how an advanced system of DNA databases could yield additional, accurate leads in the investigation of both routine and high profile crimes; and explains why this system, if properly implemented, is compatible with constitutionally protected interests of both convicted offenders and their close relatives.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)109-163
Number of pages55
JournalAmerican Criminal Law Review
Volume50
Issue number1
StatePublished - Dec 1 2013

Fingerprint

law enforcement
genealogy
kinship
corruption
surveillance
offender
offense

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Law

Cite this

@article{6a1a260b71714ecbba2840e8120065a7,
title = "The genealogy detectives: A constitutional analysis of {"}familial searching{"}",
abstract = "{"}Familial searching{"} in law enforcement DNA databases has been pilloried as a step {"}towards eugenics and corruption of blood{"} and {"}lifelong genetic surveillance{"} that is {"}inconsistent with a basic pillar of American political thought.{"} Courts have yet to address the issue fully, but several commentators contend the practice is unwise, unjust, or unconstitutional. This Article examines the more significant constitutional claims. It concludes that although kinship matching should not be implemented simply because it is technologically seductive, neither should it be removed from the realm of permissible law enforcement information gathering on constitutional grounds. In reaching this conclusion, the Article describes the logic of kinship analysis; clarifies the nature of partial-match searching; shows how an advanced system of DNA databases could yield additional, accurate leads in the investigation of both routine and high profile crimes; and explains why this system, if properly implemented, is compatible with constitutionally protected interests of both convicted offenders and their close relatives.",
author = "Kaye, {David H.}",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "109--163",
journal = "American Criminal Law Review",
issn = "0164-0364",
publisher = "Georgetown University Law Center",
number = "1",

}

The genealogy detectives : A constitutional analysis of "familial searching". / Kaye, David H.

In: American Criminal Law Review, Vol. 50, No. 1, 01.12.2013, p. 109-163.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The genealogy detectives

T2 - A constitutional analysis of "familial searching"

AU - Kaye, David H.

PY - 2013/12/1

Y1 - 2013/12/1

N2 - "Familial searching" in law enforcement DNA databases has been pilloried as a step "towards eugenics and corruption of blood" and "lifelong genetic surveillance" that is "inconsistent with a basic pillar of American political thought." Courts have yet to address the issue fully, but several commentators contend the practice is unwise, unjust, or unconstitutional. This Article examines the more significant constitutional claims. It concludes that although kinship matching should not be implemented simply because it is technologically seductive, neither should it be removed from the realm of permissible law enforcement information gathering on constitutional grounds. In reaching this conclusion, the Article describes the logic of kinship analysis; clarifies the nature of partial-match searching; shows how an advanced system of DNA databases could yield additional, accurate leads in the investigation of both routine and high profile crimes; and explains why this system, if properly implemented, is compatible with constitutionally protected interests of both convicted offenders and their close relatives.

AB - "Familial searching" in law enforcement DNA databases has been pilloried as a step "towards eugenics and corruption of blood" and "lifelong genetic surveillance" that is "inconsistent with a basic pillar of American political thought." Courts have yet to address the issue fully, but several commentators contend the practice is unwise, unjust, or unconstitutional. This Article examines the more significant constitutional claims. It concludes that although kinship matching should not be implemented simply because it is technologically seductive, neither should it be removed from the realm of permissible law enforcement information gathering on constitutional grounds. In reaching this conclusion, the Article describes the logic of kinship analysis; clarifies the nature of partial-match searching; shows how an advanced system of DNA databases could yield additional, accurate leads in the investigation of both routine and high profile crimes; and explains why this system, if properly implemented, is compatible with constitutionally protected interests of both convicted offenders and their close relatives.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907062208&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907062208&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 109

EP - 163

JO - American Criminal Law Review

JF - American Criminal Law Review

SN - 0164-0364

IS - 1

ER -