The hermeneutics of sport: limits and conditions of possibility of our understandings of sport

Francisco Javier Lopez Frias, Xavier Gimeno Monfort

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this paper, linguistic-analytic philosophy has been identified as the dominant methodology in the philosophy of sport. The hermeneutics of sport is contrasted with linguistic-analytic philosophy by analyzing Heidegger’s view of Truth. In doing so, two views of philosophy are compared: ontology or description. Sport hermeneutics’ task has to do with description. Hermeneutical explanations of sport attempt to describe the facticity of sport. Such a facticity is formed by three moments: embodiment, capabilities, and tradition. They are not components of sport that can be identified as essential components but rather, they are identifiable only for analytic purposes. These three above-mentioned elements cannot be identified as elements, because they are intrinsically intertwined forming a unitary network of meaning. The task of sport hermeneutics is to describe the different relationships that compose such a network of meaning. In doing so, sport is a humane activity linked to the constitutive human task of making sense of reality by projecting meaning into it.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)375-391
Number of pages17
JournalSport, Ethics and Philosophy
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Philosophy

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The hermeneutics of sport: limits and conditions of possibility of our understandings of sport'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this