The identification and validation process of proportional reasoning attributes

An application of a cognitive diagnosis modeling framework

Hartono Tjoe, Jimmy de la Torre

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper, we discuss the process of identifying and validating students' abilities to think proportionally. More specifically, we describe the methodology we used to identify these proportional reasoning attributes, beginning with the selection and review of relevant literature on proportional reasoning. We then continue with the deliberation and resolution of differing views by mathematics researchers, mathematics educators, and middle school mathematics teachers of what should be learned theoretically and what can be taught practically in everyday classroom settings. We also present the initial development of proportional reasoning items as part of the two-phase validation process of the previously identified attributes. In particular, we detail in the first phase of the validation process our collaboration with middle school mathematics teachers in the creation of prototype items and the verification of each item-attribute specification in consideration of the most common ways (among many different ways) in which middle school students would have solved these prototype items themselves. In the second phase of the validation process, we elaborate our think-aloud interview procedure in the search for evidence of whether students generally solved the prototype items in the way they were expected to.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)237-255
Number of pages19
JournalMathematics Education Research Journal
Volume26
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Reasoning
Directly proportional
Attribute
mathematics
Prototype
Modeling
student
teacher
deliberation
Continue
educator
Specification
classroom
Framework
Methodology
methodology
ability
interview
evidence

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Mathematics(all)
  • Education

Cite this

@article{fd954ff385e34957bc78d6b23d2242bf,
title = "The identification and validation process of proportional reasoning attributes: An application of a cognitive diagnosis modeling framework",
abstract = "In this paper, we discuss the process of identifying and validating students' abilities to think proportionally. More specifically, we describe the methodology we used to identify these proportional reasoning attributes, beginning with the selection and review of relevant literature on proportional reasoning. We then continue with the deliberation and resolution of differing views by mathematics researchers, mathematics educators, and middle school mathematics teachers of what should be learned theoretically and what can be taught practically in everyday classroom settings. We also present the initial development of proportional reasoning items as part of the two-phase validation process of the previously identified attributes. In particular, we detail in the first phase of the validation process our collaboration with middle school mathematics teachers in the creation of prototype items and the verification of each item-attribute specification in consideration of the most common ways (among many different ways) in which middle school students would have solved these prototype items themselves. In the second phase of the validation process, we elaborate our think-aloud interview procedure in the search for evidence of whether students generally solved the prototype items in the way they were expected to.",
author = "Hartono Tjoe and {de la Torre}, Jimmy",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s13394-013-0090-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "237--255",
journal = "Mathematics Education Research Journal",
issn = "1033-2170",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The identification and validation process of proportional reasoning attributes

T2 - An application of a cognitive diagnosis modeling framework

AU - Tjoe, Hartono

AU - de la Torre, Jimmy

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - In this paper, we discuss the process of identifying and validating students' abilities to think proportionally. More specifically, we describe the methodology we used to identify these proportional reasoning attributes, beginning with the selection and review of relevant literature on proportional reasoning. We then continue with the deliberation and resolution of differing views by mathematics researchers, mathematics educators, and middle school mathematics teachers of what should be learned theoretically and what can be taught practically in everyday classroom settings. We also present the initial development of proportional reasoning items as part of the two-phase validation process of the previously identified attributes. In particular, we detail in the first phase of the validation process our collaboration with middle school mathematics teachers in the creation of prototype items and the verification of each item-attribute specification in consideration of the most common ways (among many different ways) in which middle school students would have solved these prototype items themselves. In the second phase of the validation process, we elaborate our think-aloud interview procedure in the search for evidence of whether students generally solved the prototype items in the way they were expected to.

AB - In this paper, we discuss the process of identifying and validating students' abilities to think proportionally. More specifically, we describe the methodology we used to identify these proportional reasoning attributes, beginning with the selection and review of relevant literature on proportional reasoning. We then continue with the deliberation and resolution of differing views by mathematics researchers, mathematics educators, and middle school mathematics teachers of what should be learned theoretically and what can be taught practically in everyday classroom settings. We also present the initial development of proportional reasoning items as part of the two-phase validation process of the previously identified attributes. In particular, we detail in the first phase of the validation process our collaboration with middle school mathematics teachers in the creation of prototype items and the verification of each item-attribute specification in consideration of the most common ways (among many different ways) in which middle school students would have solved these prototype items themselves. In the second phase of the validation process, we elaborate our think-aloud interview procedure in the search for evidence of whether students generally solved the prototype items in the way they were expected to.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901605633&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901605633&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s13394-013-0090-7

DO - 10.1007/s13394-013-0090-7

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 237

EP - 255

JO - Mathematics Education Research Journal

JF - Mathematics Education Research Journal

SN - 1033-2170

IS - 2

ER -