The impact of choice on fairness in the context of service recovery

Anna S. Mattila, David Allen Cranage

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

96 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose - The paper proposes introducing a new antecedent to service recovery - that is customers' choice over some components of the service delivery process. The authors also examined the interactive effects of tangible compensation and apology on perceived fairness in a context of restaurant services. Design/methodology/approach - A 2 (choice) × 2 (compensation) × 2 (apology) between-subjects design was used to test the hypotheses. Subjects were exposed to a written scenario describing a restaurant experience. A total of 280 undergraduate students served as the subject pool. Findings - The study results indicate that choice, compensation and apology jointly influence customers' perceptions of informational fairness. The combined effects of apology and compensation were observed for interactional fairness, whereas only main effects were found for distributive justice. Finally, the findings suggest that the four facets of justice (distributive, procedural, interactive, and informational) are highly linked to post-recovery satisfaction. Research limitations/implications - Several limitations regarding this research should be kept in mind. First, students served as the sample pool for this investigation. Although the choice of students somewhat limits the generalizability of the results, the behaviors and responses of students and other market segments are likely to be more similar than different in service recovery incidents. Second, the manipulations involved absence and presence of three service recovery attributes (choice/no choice; compensation/no compensation, and apology/no apology). Consequently, different levels of these attributes might produce differential responses. Practical implications- The findings of this study highlight the benefits of a proactive management of the service recovery process. Originality/value - This research sheds some light on the role of choice in customer perceptions of service recovery processes. It also introduces a fourth dimension of justice - informational justice - to the service recovery literature.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)271-279
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Services Marketing
Volume19
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 13 2005

Fingerprint

Apology
Service recovery
Fairness
Customer perception
Restaurants
Distributive justice
Justice
Market segments
Design methodology
Undergraduate students
Incidents
Informational justice
Generalizability
Manipulation
Service delivery
Customer choice
Interaction
Perceived fairness
Scenarios

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Marketing

Cite this

@article{6c23c8d34bd74f158b08522e37fdc106,
title = "The impact of choice on fairness in the context of service recovery",
abstract = "Purpose - The paper proposes introducing a new antecedent to service recovery - that is customers' choice over some components of the service delivery process. The authors also examined the interactive effects of tangible compensation and apology on perceived fairness in a context of restaurant services. Design/methodology/approach - A 2 (choice) × 2 (compensation) × 2 (apology) between-subjects design was used to test the hypotheses. Subjects were exposed to a written scenario describing a restaurant experience. A total of 280 undergraduate students served as the subject pool. Findings - The study results indicate that choice, compensation and apology jointly influence customers' perceptions of informational fairness. The combined effects of apology and compensation were observed for interactional fairness, whereas only main effects were found for distributive justice. Finally, the findings suggest that the four facets of justice (distributive, procedural, interactive, and informational) are highly linked to post-recovery satisfaction. Research limitations/implications - Several limitations regarding this research should be kept in mind. First, students served as the sample pool for this investigation. Although the choice of students somewhat limits the generalizability of the results, the behaviors and responses of students and other market segments are likely to be more similar than different in service recovery incidents. Second, the manipulations involved absence and presence of three service recovery attributes (choice/no choice; compensation/no compensation, and apology/no apology). Consequently, different levels of these attributes might produce differential responses. Practical implications- The findings of this study highlight the benefits of a proactive management of the service recovery process. Originality/value - This research sheds some light on the role of choice in customer perceptions of service recovery processes. It also introduces a fourth dimension of justice - informational justice - to the service recovery literature.",
author = "Mattila, {Anna S.} and Cranage, {David Allen}",
year = "2005",
month = "9",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1108/08876040510609899",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "271--279",
journal = "Journal of Services Marketing",
issn = "0887-6045",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

The impact of choice on fairness in the context of service recovery. / Mattila, Anna S.; Cranage, David Allen.

In: Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 19, No. 5, 13.09.2005, p. 271-279.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of choice on fairness in the context of service recovery

AU - Mattila, Anna S.

AU - Cranage, David Allen

PY - 2005/9/13

Y1 - 2005/9/13

N2 - Purpose - The paper proposes introducing a new antecedent to service recovery - that is customers' choice over some components of the service delivery process. The authors also examined the interactive effects of tangible compensation and apology on perceived fairness in a context of restaurant services. Design/methodology/approach - A 2 (choice) × 2 (compensation) × 2 (apology) between-subjects design was used to test the hypotheses. Subjects were exposed to a written scenario describing a restaurant experience. A total of 280 undergraduate students served as the subject pool. Findings - The study results indicate that choice, compensation and apology jointly influence customers' perceptions of informational fairness. The combined effects of apology and compensation were observed for interactional fairness, whereas only main effects were found for distributive justice. Finally, the findings suggest that the four facets of justice (distributive, procedural, interactive, and informational) are highly linked to post-recovery satisfaction. Research limitations/implications - Several limitations regarding this research should be kept in mind. First, students served as the sample pool for this investigation. Although the choice of students somewhat limits the generalizability of the results, the behaviors and responses of students and other market segments are likely to be more similar than different in service recovery incidents. Second, the manipulations involved absence and presence of three service recovery attributes (choice/no choice; compensation/no compensation, and apology/no apology). Consequently, different levels of these attributes might produce differential responses. Practical implications- The findings of this study highlight the benefits of a proactive management of the service recovery process. Originality/value - This research sheds some light on the role of choice in customer perceptions of service recovery processes. It also introduces a fourth dimension of justice - informational justice - to the service recovery literature.

AB - Purpose - The paper proposes introducing a new antecedent to service recovery - that is customers' choice over some components of the service delivery process. The authors also examined the interactive effects of tangible compensation and apology on perceived fairness in a context of restaurant services. Design/methodology/approach - A 2 (choice) × 2 (compensation) × 2 (apology) between-subjects design was used to test the hypotheses. Subjects were exposed to a written scenario describing a restaurant experience. A total of 280 undergraduate students served as the subject pool. Findings - The study results indicate that choice, compensation and apology jointly influence customers' perceptions of informational fairness. The combined effects of apology and compensation were observed for interactional fairness, whereas only main effects were found for distributive justice. Finally, the findings suggest that the four facets of justice (distributive, procedural, interactive, and informational) are highly linked to post-recovery satisfaction. Research limitations/implications - Several limitations regarding this research should be kept in mind. First, students served as the sample pool for this investigation. Although the choice of students somewhat limits the generalizability of the results, the behaviors and responses of students and other market segments are likely to be more similar than different in service recovery incidents. Second, the manipulations involved absence and presence of three service recovery attributes (choice/no choice; compensation/no compensation, and apology/no apology). Consequently, different levels of these attributes might produce differential responses. Practical implications- The findings of this study highlight the benefits of a proactive management of the service recovery process. Originality/value - This research sheds some light on the role of choice in customer perceptions of service recovery processes. It also introduces a fourth dimension of justice - informational justice - to the service recovery literature.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=24344468726&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=24344468726&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/08876040510609899

DO - 10.1108/08876040510609899

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:24344468726

VL - 19

SP - 271

EP - 279

JO - Journal of Services Marketing

JF - Journal of Services Marketing

SN - 0887-6045

IS - 5

ER -