The Impact of Consumer Returns on the Multichannel Sales Strategies of Manufacturers

Paolo Letizia, Morteza Pourakbar, Terry Paul Harrison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Manufacturers adopt a variety of channels for the sale of their products in the attempt to deliver the highest possible value to end consumers. For instance, a manufacturers’ retail arm provides consumers with the instant gratification of product purchase and the benefit of in-store shopping assistance, whereas their online arm offers potential benefits by selling to market segments that value shopping convenience, product variety, availability, and customization. The main difference between these two channels is that consumers cannot “touch and feel” the product before they make an online purchase, whereas they can physically inspect and often even experience the product before making an in-store purchase. As a consequence, the online arm implies a higher degree of uncertainty about product fit than the retail arm. The ensuing possibility that consumers will return the product, due to product misfit, might impact the manufacturer's design of the channels of distribution. We show that product marginal value and salvage value for product returns determine whether the manufacturer will sell his product through “bricks” only, “bricks and clicks,” or “clicks” only. Our work highlights the pivotal role that online and retail channels play in the manufacturers’ sales strategies in a market characterized by returns, wherein the online channel reduces double price marginalization and the retail channel curtails the number of returns. In particular, we show that a “bricks and clicks” channel structure may be the most profitable option for the manufacturer, due to its flexibility in reducing returns without adhering to strict return policies that would hurt sales.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)323-349
Number of pages27
JournalProduction and Operations Management
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2018

Fingerprint

Sales
Brick
Salvaging
Availability
Sales strategies
Retail
Purchase

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

@article{16901a70131a4e3eb86d8051f3d92aa6,
title = "The Impact of Consumer Returns on the Multichannel Sales Strategies of Manufacturers",
abstract = "Manufacturers adopt a variety of channels for the sale of their products in the attempt to deliver the highest possible value to end consumers. For instance, a manufacturers’ retail arm provides consumers with the instant gratification of product purchase and the benefit of in-store shopping assistance, whereas their online arm offers potential benefits by selling to market segments that value shopping convenience, product variety, availability, and customization. The main difference between these two channels is that consumers cannot “touch and feel” the product before they make an online purchase, whereas they can physically inspect and often even experience the product before making an in-store purchase. As a consequence, the online arm implies a higher degree of uncertainty about product fit than the retail arm. The ensuing possibility that consumers will return the product, due to product misfit, might impact the manufacturer's design of the channels of distribution. We show that product marginal value and salvage value for product returns determine whether the manufacturer will sell his product through “bricks” only, “bricks and clicks,” or “clicks” only. Our work highlights the pivotal role that online and retail channels play in the manufacturers’ sales strategies in a market characterized by returns, wherein the online channel reduces double price marginalization and the retail channel curtails the number of returns. In particular, we show that a “bricks and clicks” channel structure may be the most profitable option for the manufacturer, due to its flexibility in reducing returns without adhering to strict return policies that would hurt sales.",
author = "Paolo Letizia and Morteza Pourakbar and Harrison, {Terry Paul}",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/poms.12799",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "323--349",
journal = "Production and Operations Management",
issn = "1059-1478",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

The Impact of Consumer Returns on the Multichannel Sales Strategies of Manufacturers. / Letizia, Paolo; Pourakbar, Morteza; Harrison, Terry Paul.

In: Production and Operations Management, Vol. 27, No. 2, 01.02.2018, p. 323-349.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Impact of Consumer Returns on the Multichannel Sales Strategies of Manufacturers

AU - Letizia, Paolo

AU - Pourakbar, Morteza

AU - Harrison, Terry Paul

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - Manufacturers adopt a variety of channels for the sale of their products in the attempt to deliver the highest possible value to end consumers. For instance, a manufacturers’ retail arm provides consumers with the instant gratification of product purchase and the benefit of in-store shopping assistance, whereas their online arm offers potential benefits by selling to market segments that value shopping convenience, product variety, availability, and customization. The main difference between these two channels is that consumers cannot “touch and feel” the product before they make an online purchase, whereas they can physically inspect and often even experience the product before making an in-store purchase. As a consequence, the online arm implies a higher degree of uncertainty about product fit than the retail arm. The ensuing possibility that consumers will return the product, due to product misfit, might impact the manufacturer's design of the channels of distribution. We show that product marginal value and salvage value for product returns determine whether the manufacturer will sell his product through “bricks” only, “bricks and clicks,” or “clicks” only. Our work highlights the pivotal role that online and retail channels play in the manufacturers’ sales strategies in a market characterized by returns, wherein the online channel reduces double price marginalization and the retail channel curtails the number of returns. In particular, we show that a “bricks and clicks” channel structure may be the most profitable option for the manufacturer, due to its flexibility in reducing returns without adhering to strict return policies that would hurt sales.

AB - Manufacturers adopt a variety of channels for the sale of their products in the attempt to deliver the highest possible value to end consumers. For instance, a manufacturers’ retail arm provides consumers with the instant gratification of product purchase and the benefit of in-store shopping assistance, whereas their online arm offers potential benefits by selling to market segments that value shopping convenience, product variety, availability, and customization. The main difference between these two channels is that consumers cannot “touch and feel” the product before they make an online purchase, whereas they can physically inspect and often even experience the product before making an in-store purchase. As a consequence, the online arm implies a higher degree of uncertainty about product fit than the retail arm. The ensuing possibility that consumers will return the product, due to product misfit, might impact the manufacturer's design of the channels of distribution. We show that product marginal value and salvage value for product returns determine whether the manufacturer will sell his product through “bricks” only, “bricks and clicks,” or “clicks” only. Our work highlights the pivotal role that online and retail channels play in the manufacturers’ sales strategies in a market characterized by returns, wherein the online channel reduces double price marginalization and the retail channel curtails the number of returns. In particular, we show that a “bricks and clicks” channel structure may be the most profitable option for the manufacturer, due to its flexibility in reducing returns without adhering to strict return policies that would hurt sales.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041955983&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041955983&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/poms.12799

DO - 10.1111/poms.12799

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85041955983

VL - 27

SP - 323

EP - 349

JO - Production and Operations Management

JF - Production and Operations Management

SN - 1059-1478

IS - 2

ER -