The impact of fear versus state empathy on persuasion and social stigma

Lulu Peng, Lijiang Shen, Rachel Reymann Vanderbilt, Youllee Kim, Kasey Ann Foley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The study investigated the impact of fear and state empathy on persuasion and social stigma. Eighteen professionally produced public service announcements (PSAs) were employed as stimuli in a 2 (message topic: antidrug vs. safe driving) × 3 (message type: empathy vs. fear vs. control) × 3 (messages) mixed-design experiment. Participants (N = 406) were randomly assigned to one of the 6 cells and watched the 3 videos in that condition. Multilevel structural equation modeling analyses showed that fear and state empathy both had positive direct effects on persuasion. Fear led to more affective stigma, whereas state empathy reduced cognitive stigma. Fear also resulted in stronger reactance which decreased persuasion; conversely, empathy mitigated reactance, hence had a positive indirect effect on persuasion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalMedia Psychology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Social Stigma
Persuasive Communication
persuasion
empathy
Fear
anxiety
reactance
Experiments
public service
stimulus
video
experiment

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Communication
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Peng, Lulu ; Shen, Lijiang ; Vanderbilt, Rachel Reymann ; Kim, Youllee ; Foley, Kasey Ann. / The impact of fear versus state empathy on persuasion and social stigma. In: Media Psychology. 2018.
@article{a1906e8088da47288fa84462f5b46a01,
title = "The impact of fear versus state empathy on persuasion and social stigma",
abstract = "The study investigated the impact of fear and state empathy on persuasion and social stigma. Eighteen professionally produced public service announcements (PSAs) were employed as stimuli in a 2 (message topic: antidrug vs. safe driving) × 3 (message type: empathy vs. fear vs. control) × 3 (messages) mixed-design experiment. Participants (N = 406) were randomly assigned to one of the 6 cells and watched the 3 videos in that condition. Multilevel structural equation modeling analyses showed that fear and state empathy both had positive direct effects on persuasion. Fear led to more affective stigma, whereas state empathy reduced cognitive stigma. Fear also resulted in stronger reactance which decreased persuasion; conversely, empathy mitigated reactance, hence had a positive indirect effect on persuasion.",
author = "Lulu Peng and Lijiang Shen and Vanderbilt, {Rachel Reymann} and Youllee Kim and Foley, {Kasey Ann}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/15213269.2018.1535321",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Media Psychology",
issn = "1521-3269",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

The impact of fear versus state empathy on persuasion and social stigma. / Peng, Lulu; Shen, Lijiang; Vanderbilt, Rachel Reymann; Kim, Youllee; Foley, Kasey Ann.

In: Media Psychology, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of fear versus state empathy on persuasion and social stigma

AU - Peng, Lulu

AU - Shen, Lijiang

AU - Vanderbilt, Rachel Reymann

AU - Kim, Youllee

AU - Foley, Kasey Ann

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - The study investigated the impact of fear and state empathy on persuasion and social stigma. Eighteen professionally produced public service announcements (PSAs) were employed as stimuli in a 2 (message topic: antidrug vs. safe driving) × 3 (message type: empathy vs. fear vs. control) × 3 (messages) mixed-design experiment. Participants (N = 406) were randomly assigned to one of the 6 cells and watched the 3 videos in that condition. Multilevel structural equation modeling analyses showed that fear and state empathy both had positive direct effects on persuasion. Fear led to more affective stigma, whereas state empathy reduced cognitive stigma. Fear also resulted in stronger reactance which decreased persuasion; conversely, empathy mitigated reactance, hence had a positive indirect effect on persuasion.

AB - The study investigated the impact of fear and state empathy on persuasion and social stigma. Eighteen professionally produced public service announcements (PSAs) were employed as stimuli in a 2 (message topic: antidrug vs. safe driving) × 3 (message type: empathy vs. fear vs. control) × 3 (messages) mixed-design experiment. Participants (N = 406) were randomly assigned to one of the 6 cells and watched the 3 videos in that condition. Multilevel structural equation modeling analyses showed that fear and state empathy both had positive direct effects on persuasion. Fear led to more affective stigma, whereas state empathy reduced cognitive stigma. Fear also resulted in stronger reactance which decreased persuasion; conversely, empathy mitigated reactance, hence had a positive indirect effect on persuasion.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057564116&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057564116&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15213269.2018.1535321

DO - 10.1080/15213269.2018.1535321

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85057564116

JO - Media Psychology

JF - Media Psychology

SN - 1521-3269

ER -