TY - JOUR
T1 - The Impact of Missing Risk Factor Data on Semiparametric Group-Based Trajectory Models
AU - Ray, James V.
AU - Sullivan, Christopher J.
AU - Loughran, Thomas
AU - Jones, Shayne E.
PY - 2018/9/1
Y1 - 2018/9/1
N2 - Purpose: To investigate how missing data (Missing Completely at Random [MCAR] vs. Missing Not at Random [MNAR]) on risk factors can impact trajectory solutions (i.e., latent class probabilities) and coefficient estimates capturing the relationship between covariates and trajectory group solutions using a semiparametric group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) approach. Methods: To address this issue, we conducted a systematic investigation using Monte Carlo simulation. Data were generated from a population with known growth parameters and risk factors. Observations for risk factors were then systematically deleted in a way that reflects key missing data assumptions (MCAR and MNAR). Models were then estimated to test the sensitivity of the estimates to each missing data scenario. Results: Two key findings emerged: (1) trajectory solutions were largely unaffected by missing data on risk factors; and, (2) there was some degree of bias in estimating relationships between risk factors and trajectory group membership when data were missing on those risk factors. Conclusions: GBTM may be useful for testing etiological explanations of long-term patterns of offending. Missing data on risk factors poses a threat to this approach, however.
AB - Purpose: To investigate how missing data (Missing Completely at Random [MCAR] vs. Missing Not at Random [MNAR]) on risk factors can impact trajectory solutions (i.e., latent class probabilities) and coefficient estimates capturing the relationship between covariates and trajectory group solutions using a semiparametric group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) approach. Methods: To address this issue, we conducted a systematic investigation using Monte Carlo simulation. Data were generated from a population with known growth parameters and risk factors. Observations for risk factors were then systematically deleted in a way that reflects key missing data assumptions (MCAR and MNAR). Models were then estimated to test the sensitivity of the estimates to each missing data scenario. Results: Two key findings emerged: (1) trajectory solutions were largely unaffected by missing data on risk factors; and, (2) there was some degree of bias in estimating relationships between risk factors and trajectory group membership when data were missing on those risk factors. Conclusions: GBTM may be useful for testing etiological explanations of long-term patterns of offending. Missing data on risk factors poses a threat to this approach, however.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068067869&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068067869&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s40865-018-0085-x
DO - 10.1007/s40865-018-0085-x
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85068067869
SN - 2199-4641
VL - 4
SP - 276
EP - 296
JO - Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology
JF - Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology
IS - 3
ER -