The impact of stigma, experience, and group referent on HIV risk assessments and HIV testing intentions in Namibia

Rachel Annette Smith, Daniel Morrison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

People often perceive risks for others and themselves differently. This study examines whether personal beliefs about HIV and experience with those living with HIV influence personal risk assessments of contracting HIV in an interview sample of northern Namibians (N = 400), but not others' assessments as explained by singular-distribution theory [Klar, Medding, & Sarel (1996). Nonunique invulnerability: Singular versus distributional probabilities and unrealistic optimism in comparative risk judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 229-245]. Findings indicate that personal risk perceptions decrease with more HIV stigmatizing beliefs and increase with greater experience, but that those characteristics had no impact on assessments for others' risk. The study also examines whether the size and characteristics of the referent group, peers and the general Namibian population, influence others' risk assessments. Optimistic biases for personal risk versus others' risk appear with the highest discrepancy emerging between personal and general population risk assessments. Further, we found that personal risk perceptions did not mediate the relationship between personal characteristics, beliefs and experiences, and intentions to seek HIV testing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2649-2660
Number of pages12
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume63
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2006

Fingerprint

Namibia
risk assessment
HIV
experience
Group
distribution theory
Peer Group
organizational behavior
peer group
Population
optimism
Testing
Intentions
Stigma
Referent
Risk Assessment
AIDS/HIV
Interviews
trend
interview

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health(social science)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

@article{1b75a042ecb54f89a9b45154b7dbbdaf,
title = "The impact of stigma, experience, and group referent on HIV risk assessments and HIV testing intentions in Namibia",
abstract = "People often perceive risks for others and themselves differently. This study examines whether personal beliefs about HIV and experience with those living with HIV influence personal risk assessments of contracting HIV in an interview sample of northern Namibians (N = 400), but not others' assessments as explained by singular-distribution theory [Klar, Medding, & Sarel (1996). Nonunique invulnerability: Singular versus distributional probabilities and unrealistic optimism in comparative risk judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 229-245]. Findings indicate that personal risk perceptions decrease with more HIV stigmatizing beliefs and increase with greater experience, but that those characteristics had no impact on assessments for others' risk. The study also examines whether the size and characteristics of the referent group, peers and the general Namibian population, influence others' risk assessments. Optimistic biases for personal risk versus others' risk appear with the highest discrepancy emerging between personal and general population risk assessments. Further, we found that personal risk perceptions did not mediate the relationship between personal characteristics, beliefs and experiences, and intentions to seek HIV testing.",
author = "Smith, {Rachel Annette} and Daniel Morrison",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.07.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "2649--2660",
journal = "Social Science and Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "10",

}

The impact of stigma, experience, and group referent on HIV risk assessments and HIV testing intentions in Namibia. / Smith, Rachel Annette; Morrison, Daniel.

In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 63, No. 10, 01.11.2006, p. 2649-2660.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of stigma, experience, and group referent on HIV risk assessments and HIV testing intentions in Namibia

AU - Smith, Rachel Annette

AU - Morrison, Daniel

PY - 2006/11/1

Y1 - 2006/11/1

N2 - People often perceive risks for others and themselves differently. This study examines whether personal beliefs about HIV and experience with those living with HIV influence personal risk assessments of contracting HIV in an interview sample of northern Namibians (N = 400), but not others' assessments as explained by singular-distribution theory [Klar, Medding, & Sarel (1996). Nonunique invulnerability: Singular versus distributional probabilities and unrealistic optimism in comparative risk judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 229-245]. Findings indicate that personal risk perceptions decrease with more HIV stigmatizing beliefs and increase with greater experience, but that those characteristics had no impact on assessments for others' risk. The study also examines whether the size and characteristics of the referent group, peers and the general Namibian population, influence others' risk assessments. Optimistic biases for personal risk versus others' risk appear with the highest discrepancy emerging between personal and general population risk assessments. Further, we found that personal risk perceptions did not mediate the relationship between personal characteristics, beliefs and experiences, and intentions to seek HIV testing.

AB - People often perceive risks for others and themselves differently. This study examines whether personal beliefs about HIV and experience with those living with HIV influence personal risk assessments of contracting HIV in an interview sample of northern Namibians (N = 400), but not others' assessments as explained by singular-distribution theory [Klar, Medding, & Sarel (1996). Nonunique invulnerability: Singular versus distributional probabilities and unrealistic optimism in comparative risk judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 229-245]. Findings indicate that personal risk perceptions decrease with more HIV stigmatizing beliefs and increase with greater experience, but that those characteristics had no impact on assessments for others' risk. The study also examines whether the size and characteristics of the referent group, peers and the general Namibian population, influence others' risk assessments. Optimistic biases for personal risk versus others' risk appear with the highest discrepancy emerging between personal and general population risk assessments. Further, we found that personal risk perceptions did not mediate the relationship between personal characteristics, beliefs and experiences, and intentions to seek HIV testing.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749266863&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33749266863&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.07.006

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.07.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 16930796

AN - SCOPUS:33749266863

VL - 63

SP - 2649

EP - 2660

JO - Social Science and Medicine

JF - Social Science and Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

IS - 10

ER -