The impact of teaming and cognitive style on student perceptions of design ideation outcomes

Kathryn Weed Jablokow, Wesley Teerlink, Seda Yilmaz, Shanna R. Daly, Eli M. Silk

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ideation is a key component of the design process, which often takes place in team settings. The team approach to design requires the involvement of all parties demonstrating the use of their expertise and knowledge in the area. Teaming has been shown to have both positive and negative impacts on ideation activities1-5. Cognitive style - or the stable, preferred way that people manage and seek to bring about change - helps us understand the different ways in which people solve problems individually and as part of a team. When team members' cognitive styles are diverse, creating an effect known as cognitive gap, the team may experience the advantages of approaching problems in diverse ways, but the likelihood of conflicts and misunderstandings increases6. This study investigated the relationship between cognitive style and the perceptions of students working in teams about their own ideation. Through the analysis of reflection surveys from 202 pre-engineering, engineering, and design students participating in an ideation study, we explored the following questions: (1) how does working in teams impact students' perceptions of their own ideation?; and (2) how do team members' cognitive styles impact their perceptions of their ideation and team contributions? In this paper, we report on the significant correlations between cognitive style and changes in students' perceptions about their ideation creativity, diversity, elaboration, and difficulty, as well as our exploration of the impact of teaming on these perceptions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
Volume122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society
Issue number122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for...
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015
Event2015 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition - Seattle, United States
Duration: Jun 14 2015Jun 17 2015

Fingerprint

Students

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Jablokow, K. W., Teerlink, W., Yilmaz, S., Daly, S. R., & Silk, E. M. (2015). The impact of teaming and cognitive style on student perceptions of design ideation outcomes. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society(122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for...).
Jablokow, Kathryn Weed ; Teerlink, Wesley ; Yilmaz, Seda ; Daly, Shanna R. ; Silk, Eli M. / The impact of teaming and cognitive style on student perceptions of design ideation outcomes. In: ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. 2015 ; Vol. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society, No. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for...
@article{c70844786fd1462dba0913e88806356b,
title = "The impact of teaming and cognitive style on student perceptions of design ideation outcomes",
abstract = "Ideation is a key component of the design process, which often takes place in team settings. The team approach to design requires the involvement of all parties demonstrating the use of their expertise and knowledge in the area. Teaming has been shown to have both positive and negative impacts on ideation activities1-5. Cognitive style - or the stable, preferred way that people manage and seek to bring about change - helps us understand the different ways in which people solve problems individually and as part of a team. When team members' cognitive styles are diverse, creating an effect known as cognitive gap, the team may experience the advantages of approaching problems in diverse ways, but the likelihood of conflicts and misunderstandings increases6. This study investigated the relationship between cognitive style and the perceptions of students working in teams about their own ideation. Through the analysis of reflection surveys from 202 pre-engineering, engineering, and design students participating in an ideation study, we explored the following questions: (1) how does working in teams impact students' perceptions of their own ideation?; and (2) how do team members' cognitive styles impact their perceptions of their ideation and team contributions? In this paper, we report on the significant correlations between cognitive style and changes in students' perceptions about their ideation creativity, diversity, elaboration, and difficulty, as well as our exploration of the impact of teaming on these perceptions.",
author = "Jablokow, {Kathryn Weed} and Wesley Teerlink and Seda Yilmaz and Daly, {Shanna R.} and Silk, {Eli M.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society",
journal = "ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings",
issn = "2153-5965",
number = "122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for...",

}

Jablokow, KW, Teerlink, W, Yilmaz, S, Daly, SR & Silk, EM 2015, 'The impact of teaming and cognitive style on student perceptions of design ideation outcomes', ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, vol. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society, no. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for....

The impact of teaming and cognitive style on student perceptions of design ideation outcomes. / Jablokow, Kathryn Weed; Teerlink, Wesley; Yilmaz, Seda; Daly, Shanna R.; Silk, Eli M.

In: ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, Vol. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society, No. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for..., 01.01.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of teaming and cognitive style on student perceptions of design ideation outcomes

AU - Jablokow, Kathryn Weed

AU - Teerlink, Wesley

AU - Yilmaz, Seda

AU - Daly, Shanna R.

AU - Silk, Eli M.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Ideation is a key component of the design process, which often takes place in team settings. The team approach to design requires the involvement of all parties demonstrating the use of their expertise and knowledge in the area. Teaming has been shown to have both positive and negative impacts on ideation activities1-5. Cognitive style - or the stable, preferred way that people manage and seek to bring about change - helps us understand the different ways in which people solve problems individually and as part of a team. When team members' cognitive styles are diverse, creating an effect known as cognitive gap, the team may experience the advantages of approaching problems in diverse ways, but the likelihood of conflicts and misunderstandings increases6. This study investigated the relationship between cognitive style and the perceptions of students working in teams about their own ideation. Through the analysis of reflection surveys from 202 pre-engineering, engineering, and design students participating in an ideation study, we explored the following questions: (1) how does working in teams impact students' perceptions of their own ideation?; and (2) how do team members' cognitive styles impact their perceptions of their ideation and team contributions? In this paper, we report on the significant correlations between cognitive style and changes in students' perceptions about their ideation creativity, diversity, elaboration, and difficulty, as well as our exploration of the impact of teaming on these perceptions.

AB - Ideation is a key component of the design process, which often takes place in team settings. The team approach to design requires the involvement of all parties demonstrating the use of their expertise and knowledge in the area. Teaming has been shown to have both positive and negative impacts on ideation activities1-5. Cognitive style - or the stable, preferred way that people manage and seek to bring about change - helps us understand the different ways in which people solve problems individually and as part of a team. When team members' cognitive styles are diverse, creating an effect known as cognitive gap, the team may experience the advantages of approaching problems in diverse ways, but the likelihood of conflicts and misunderstandings increases6. This study investigated the relationship between cognitive style and the perceptions of students working in teams about their own ideation. Through the analysis of reflection surveys from 202 pre-engineering, engineering, and design students participating in an ideation study, we explored the following questions: (1) how does working in teams impact students' perceptions of their own ideation?; and (2) how do team members' cognitive styles impact their perceptions of their ideation and team contributions? In this paper, we report on the significant correlations between cognitive style and changes in students' perceptions about their ideation creativity, diversity, elaboration, and difficulty, as well as our exploration of the impact of teaming on these perceptions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941994552&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941994552&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:84941994552

VL - 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society

JO - ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

JF - ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

SN - 2153-5965

IS - 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for...

ER -

Jablokow KW, Teerlink W, Yilmaz S, Daly SR, Silk EM. The impact of teaming and cognitive style on student perceptions of design ideation outcomes. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. 2015 Jan 1;122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society(122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for...).