The Impact of Three Cognitive Training Programs on Driving Cessation Across 10 Years

A Randomized Controlled Trial

Lesley Anne Ross, Sara A. Freed, Jerri D. Edwards, Christine B. Phillips, Karlene Ball

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose of the Study Driving is important for older adults' health and well-being, yet little research has examined interventions to maintain driving mobility. As fluid cognitive abilities are strongly linked to driving, targeted cognitive training interventions may impact driving mobility longitudinally. This study assessed the effects of three different cognitive training programs (reasoning, speed of processing, and memory) on driving cessation in older adults across 10 years (n = 2,390). Design and Methods Cox regression analyses evaluated the impact of each program relative to a no-contact control group with intent-to-treat (ITT) analyses. The effects of randomization to additional booster sessions were also examined. Subsample analyses repeated these models in participants who were at-risk for driving mobility declines. Results There were no training (n = 2,390) or booster training (n = 1,540) effects on driving cessation with ITT analyses. Individuals at-risk for future mobility declines were 49% (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28, 0.94; n = 336) less likely to cease driving after speed of processing training and 55% (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.24, 0.86; n = 324) less likely to quit driving subsequent to reasoning training. Additional booster sessions for speed of processing training resulted in a 70% reduction of driving cessation (HR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.82; n = 252) in the subsample analyses. There were no significant effects of memory training. Implications Some cognitive interventions transfer to maintained driving among those at-risk for mobility declines due to cognitive impairment. Future research should identify moderators and mediators of training and transfer effects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)838-846
Number of pages9
JournalGerontologist
Volume57
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2017

Fingerprint

Randomized Controlled Trials
Confidence Intervals
Education
Aptitude
Random Allocation
Regression Analysis
Learning
Control Groups
Health
Research
Transfer (Psychology)
Cognitive Dysfunction

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Gerontology
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

Ross, Lesley Anne ; Freed, Sara A. ; Edwards, Jerri D. ; Phillips, Christine B. ; Ball, Karlene. / The Impact of Three Cognitive Training Programs on Driving Cessation Across 10 Years : A Randomized Controlled Trial. In: Gerontologist. 2017 ; Vol. 57, No. 5. pp. 838-846.
@article{425fdc6307cd4f5baf19192fa0022b31,
title = "The Impact of Three Cognitive Training Programs on Driving Cessation Across 10 Years: A Randomized Controlled Trial",
abstract = "Purpose of the Study Driving is important for older adults' health and well-being, yet little research has examined interventions to maintain driving mobility. As fluid cognitive abilities are strongly linked to driving, targeted cognitive training interventions may impact driving mobility longitudinally. This study assessed the effects of three different cognitive training programs (reasoning, speed of processing, and memory) on driving cessation in older adults across 10 years (n = 2,390). Design and Methods Cox regression analyses evaluated the impact of each program relative to a no-contact control group with intent-to-treat (ITT) analyses. The effects of randomization to additional booster sessions were also examined. Subsample analyses repeated these models in participants who were at-risk for driving mobility declines. Results There were no training (n = 2,390) or booster training (n = 1,540) effects on driving cessation with ITT analyses. Individuals at-risk for future mobility declines were 49{\%} (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.51, 95{\%} confidence interval [CI]: 0.28, 0.94; n = 336) less likely to cease driving after speed of processing training and 55{\%} (HR = 0.45, 95{\%} CI: 0.24, 0.86; n = 324) less likely to quit driving subsequent to reasoning training. Additional booster sessions for speed of processing training resulted in a 70{\%} reduction of driving cessation (HR = 0.30, 95{\%} CI: 0.11, 0.82; n = 252) in the subsample analyses. There were no significant effects of memory training. Implications Some cognitive interventions transfer to maintained driving among those at-risk for mobility declines due to cognitive impairment. Future research should identify moderators and mediators of training and transfer effects.",
author = "Ross, {Lesley Anne} and Freed, {Sara A.} and Edwards, {Jerri D.} and Phillips, {Christine B.} and Karlene Ball",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/geront/gnw143",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "57",
pages = "838--846",
journal = "The Gerontologist",
issn = "0016-9013",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "5",

}

The Impact of Three Cognitive Training Programs on Driving Cessation Across 10 Years : A Randomized Controlled Trial. / Ross, Lesley Anne; Freed, Sara A.; Edwards, Jerri D.; Phillips, Christine B.; Ball, Karlene.

In: Gerontologist, Vol. 57, No. 5, 01.10.2017, p. 838-846.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Impact of Three Cognitive Training Programs on Driving Cessation Across 10 Years

T2 - A Randomized Controlled Trial

AU - Ross, Lesley Anne

AU - Freed, Sara A.

AU - Edwards, Jerri D.

AU - Phillips, Christine B.

AU - Ball, Karlene

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - Purpose of the Study Driving is important for older adults' health and well-being, yet little research has examined interventions to maintain driving mobility. As fluid cognitive abilities are strongly linked to driving, targeted cognitive training interventions may impact driving mobility longitudinally. This study assessed the effects of three different cognitive training programs (reasoning, speed of processing, and memory) on driving cessation in older adults across 10 years (n = 2,390). Design and Methods Cox regression analyses evaluated the impact of each program relative to a no-contact control group with intent-to-treat (ITT) analyses. The effects of randomization to additional booster sessions were also examined. Subsample analyses repeated these models in participants who were at-risk for driving mobility declines. Results There were no training (n = 2,390) or booster training (n = 1,540) effects on driving cessation with ITT analyses. Individuals at-risk for future mobility declines were 49% (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28, 0.94; n = 336) less likely to cease driving after speed of processing training and 55% (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.24, 0.86; n = 324) less likely to quit driving subsequent to reasoning training. Additional booster sessions for speed of processing training resulted in a 70% reduction of driving cessation (HR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.82; n = 252) in the subsample analyses. There were no significant effects of memory training. Implications Some cognitive interventions transfer to maintained driving among those at-risk for mobility declines due to cognitive impairment. Future research should identify moderators and mediators of training and transfer effects.

AB - Purpose of the Study Driving is important for older adults' health and well-being, yet little research has examined interventions to maintain driving mobility. As fluid cognitive abilities are strongly linked to driving, targeted cognitive training interventions may impact driving mobility longitudinally. This study assessed the effects of three different cognitive training programs (reasoning, speed of processing, and memory) on driving cessation in older adults across 10 years (n = 2,390). Design and Methods Cox regression analyses evaluated the impact of each program relative to a no-contact control group with intent-to-treat (ITT) analyses. The effects of randomization to additional booster sessions were also examined. Subsample analyses repeated these models in participants who were at-risk for driving mobility declines. Results There were no training (n = 2,390) or booster training (n = 1,540) effects on driving cessation with ITT analyses. Individuals at-risk for future mobility declines were 49% (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28, 0.94; n = 336) less likely to cease driving after speed of processing training and 55% (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.24, 0.86; n = 324) less likely to quit driving subsequent to reasoning training. Additional booster sessions for speed of processing training resulted in a 70% reduction of driving cessation (HR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.82; n = 252) in the subsample analyses. There were no significant effects of memory training. Implications Some cognitive interventions transfer to maintained driving among those at-risk for mobility declines due to cognitive impairment. Future research should identify moderators and mediators of training and transfer effects.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030790908&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85030790908&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/geront/gnw143

DO - 10.1093/geront/gnw143

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 838

EP - 846

JO - The Gerontologist

JF - The Gerontologist

SN - 0016-9013

IS - 5

ER -