The "independent" investigator

How academic scientists construct their professional identity in university-industry agricultural biotechnology research collaborations

Dina Biscotti, Leland Luther Glenna, William B. Lacy, Rick Welsh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose - University-industry relationships raise concerns about the influence of commercial interests on academic science. In this paper, we investigate how academic scientists who collaborate with industry understand their professional identity in relation to their research money and the notion of scientific "independence."Design/Methodology/Approach - We conducted in-depth interviews with 84 scientists and 65 administrators from 9 U.S. universities. The scientists do research in the field of agricultural biotechnology and collaborate with industry. The administrators have oversight responsibility for academic research, university-industry collaborations, and technology transfer. Findings - We find that our respondents are wary of industry funding but believe that it has an appropriate place in academic research. Typically, industry money is treated either as seed money for preliminary research or as flexible funding that supplements the core, essential competitive grants academic scientists obtain from public agencies. We find that academic scientists talk about the mix of public and private funds in their research funding portfolios in ways that aim to construct an "independent" investigator professional identity. Originality/Value - Our study is a case of how money is inscribed with meanings in institutional settings. It contributes to scholarship in economic sociology of work by revealing how money is used by academic scientists to signal their alignment with institutionally sanctioned professional norms and by administrators to evaluate scientists' work.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)261-285
Number of pages25
JournalResearch in the Sociology of Work
Volume18
StatePublished - Dec 1 2009

Fingerprint

agricultural industry
biotechnology
university
money
industry
funding
sociology of work
technology transfer
supplement
grant
responsibility
methodology
interview
science

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{4e8fae3d70f54ecf90ea85e0d19041e2,
title = "The {"}independent{"} investigator: How academic scientists construct their professional identity in university-industry agricultural biotechnology research collaborations",
abstract = "Purpose - University-industry relationships raise concerns about the influence of commercial interests on academic science. In this paper, we investigate how academic scientists who collaborate with industry understand their professional identity in relation to their research money and the notion of scientific {"}independence.{"}Design/Methodology/Approach - We conducted in-depth interviews with 84 scientists and 65 administrators from 9 U.S. universities. The scientists do research in the field of agricultural biotechnology and collaborate with industry. The administrators have oversight responsibility for academic research, university-industry collaborations, and technology transfer. Findings - We find that our respondents are wary of industry funding but believe that it has an appropriate place in academic research. Typically, industry money is treated either as seed money for preliminary research or as flexible funding that supplements the core, essential competitive grants academic scientists obtain from public agencies. We find that academic scientists talk about the mix of public and private funds in their research funding portfolios in ways that aim to construct an {"}independent{"} investigator professional identity. Originality/Value - Our study is a case of how money is inscribed with meanings in institutional settings. It contributes to scholarship in economic sociology of work by revealing how money is used by academic scientists to signal their alignment with institutionally sanctioned professional norms and by administrators to evaluate scientists' work.",
author = "Dina Biscotti and Glenna, {Leland Luther} and Lacy, {William B.} and Rick Welsh",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "261--285",
journal = "Research in the Sociology of Work",
issn = "0277-2833",
publisher = "JAI Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The "independent" investigator

T2 - How academic scientists construct their professional identity in university-industry agricultural biotechnology research collaborations

AU - Biscotti, Dina

AU - Glenna, Leland Luther

AU - Lacy, William B.

AU - Welsh, Rick

PY - 2009/12/1

Y1 - 2009/12/1

N2 - Purpose - University-industry relationships raise concerns about the influence of commercial interests on academic science. In this paper, we investigate how academic scientists who collaborate with industry understand their professional identity in relation to their research money and the notion of scientific "independence."Design/Methodology/Approach - We conducted in-depth interviews with 84 scientists and 65 administrators from 9 U.S. universities. The scientists do research in the field of agricultural biotechnology and collaborate with industry. The administrators have oversight responsibility for academic research, university-industry collaborations, and technology transfer. Findings - We find that our respondents are wary of industry funding but believe that it has an appropriate place in academic research. Typically, industry money is treated either as seed money for preliminary research or as flexible funding that supplements the core, essential competitive grants academic scientists obtain from public agencies. We find that academic scientists talk about the mix of public and private funds in their research funding portfolios in ways that aim to construct an "independent" investigator professional identity. Originality/Value - Our study is a case of how money is inscribed with meanings in institutional settings. It contributes to scholarship in economic sociology of work by revealing how money is used by academic scientists to signal their alignment with institutionally sanctioned professional norms and by administrators to evaluate scientists' work.

AB - Purpose - University-industry relationships raise concerns about the influence of commercial interests on academic science. In this paper, we investigate how academic scientists who collaborate with industry understand their professional identity in relation to their research money and the notion of scientific "independence."Design/Methodology/Approach - We conducted in-depth interviews with 84 scientists and 65 administrators from 9 U.S. universities. The scientists do research in the field of agricultural biotechnology and collaborate with industry. The administrators have oversight responsibility for academic research, university-industry collaborations, and technology transfer. Findings - We find that our respondents are wary of industry funding but believe that it has an appropriate place in academic research. Typically, industry money is treated either as seed money for preliminary research or as flexible funding that supplements the core, essential competitive grants academic scientists obtain from public agencies. We find that academic scientists talk about the mix of public and private funds in their research funding portfolios in ways that aim to construct an "independent" investigator professional identity. Originality/Value - Our study is a case of how money is inscribed with meanings in institutional settings. It contributes to scholarship in economic sociology of work by revealing how money is used by academic scientists to signal their alignment with institutionally sanctioned professional norms and by administrators to evaluate scientists' work.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950726535&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77950726535&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 261

EP - 285

JO - Research in the Sociology of Work

JF - Research in the Sociology of Work

SN - 0277-2833

ER -