The influence of 180° ferroelectric domain wall width on the threshold field for wall motion

Samrat Choudhury, Yulan Li, Nozomi Odagawa, Aravind Vasudevarao, L. Tian, Pavel Capek, Volkmar Dierolf, Anna N. Morozovska, Eugene A. Eliseev, Sergei Kalinin, Yasuo Cho, Long Qing Chen, Venkatraman Gopalan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

38 Scopus citations

Abstract

Unlike ideal 180° ferroelectric walls that are a unit cell wide (∼0.5 nm), real walls in ferroelectrics have been reported to be many nanometers wide (1-10 nm). Using scanning nonlinear dielectric microscopy of lithium niobate (LiNbO3) and lithium tantalate (LiTaO3) ferroelectrics, we show that the wall width at surfaces can vary considerably and even reach ∼100 nm in places where polar defects adjoin a wall. The consequence of such variable wall widths is investigated on the specific property of threshold field required for wall motion. Using microscopic phase-field modeling, we show that the threshold field for moving an antiparallel ferroelectric domain wall dramatically drops by two to three orders of magnitude if the wall was diffuse by only ∼1-2 nm, which agrees with experimental wall widths and threshold fields for these materials. Modeling also shows that wall broadening due to its intersection with a surface will influence the threshold field for wall motion only for very thin films (1-10 nm) where the surface broadening influences the bulk wall width. Such pre-existing and slightly diffuse domain walls with low threshold fields for wall motion may offer a general mechanism to explain significantly lower experimental coercive fields for domain reversal in ferroelectrics as compared to the thermodynamic predictions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number084107
JournalJournal of Applied Physics
Volume104
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The influence of 180° ferroelectric domain wall width on the threshold field for wall motion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this